Invoking clause 4 of Article 2, the petitioner declared that the order of the writ court has been complied with. The Hon'ble Court held the contempt petition infructuous and dismissed it, discharging the contempt notice issued to the respondent.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous; contempt notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CLCON No.24 of 2018
Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J.
Ms. Sheetal Selawal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order passed by the writ court has been complied with and the present contempt petition has rendered infructuous.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Contempt notice issued to the respondent is hereby discharged.
(V.K. Bist, J.) 06.3.2018
A.kaur
Petitioner
Respondent
V.K. Bist
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
