The single-judge High Court dismissed the appeal as peremptorily on the appellant's statement that parties had compromised in the trial court and sought withdrawal, noting no opposition.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AO No. 399 of 2015
Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.
Mr. Karan Anand, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the appellant makes the statement in the court that the parties have entered into the compromise in the Trial Court. So, he wants to withdraw this appeal.
It is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent.
Appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
(Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.)
17.7.2017
Pooja
Pooja
Servesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
