Dismissed
Madan Lal Thakur v. Union Of India and Others
Uttarakhand HCWPSS/1771/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2016 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr.…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2016 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPSS No. 1771 of 2016
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate present
for the petitioner.
None present for the respondents/Union of India.
Before arguing the case on its merit, a statement has been given by learned counsel for the petitioner at bar that this writ petition has been filed due to inadvertent mistake, as Sports Authority of India is notified under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunal’s Act by the Central Government.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, hence, the petitioner has an alternative remedy to first approach Central Administrative Tribunal, particularly in view of the Constitution Bench Judgment in the case of L. Chandra Kumar Vs Union of India reported in AIR 1997 SC 1125 . This writ petition is not maintainable in the first instance before this Court.
Accordingly, the writ petition is hereby dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 22.11.2016
Aswal
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
L. Chandra Kumar Vs Union of IndiaApplied¶7
L. Chandra Kumar Vs Union of India; AIR 1997 SC 1125 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Union of India
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court