Azim v. State Of Uttarakhand and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2016 U.C. Dhyani, J. Mr. Rajendra Singh…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No. 618 of 2016
U.C. Dhyani, J.
Mr. Rajendra Singh Azad, Advocate, present for the petitioner.
Mr. V.K.Jemini, Deputy Advocate General with
Mr. B.M.Pingal Brief Holder present for the State.
Learned counsel for the State submitted that charge sheet has been filed against the writ petitioner.
In view of the above development, the criminal writ petition has rendered infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, will continue to operate till the submission of charge sheet before the Court concerned and no further.
(U.C. Dhyani, J.) 22.11.2016
NP
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Writ Petitioner
- respondent
State
Coram
U.C. Dhyani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPCRL/618/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court