This order directs the Registry to tag a supplementary affidavit filed by the appellants, which was stated to be not on record, to the file in SA No.97 of 2011.
The Registry is directed to tag the supplementary affidavit filed by the appellants to the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 2 .0 5 .2 0 2 2 | SA No.97 of 2011 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Heard Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned counel for the appellants and Mr. J.C. Belwal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the respondent. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that a supplementary affidavit has been filed by him, however, the said affidavit is not on record. List this case on 26.05.2022. The Registry is directed to tag the said affidavit with this file. |
||
| ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 1 2 .0 5 .2 0 2 2 Ravi |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to tag the supplementary affidavit filed by the appellants to the record.
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
