Writ petitioner, a Sepoy terminated for bigamy, approached the High Court for direction to the Deputy Inspector General to decide his pending appeal within 12 weeks.
Direction to the respondent to dispose of the pending appeal within 12 weeks of receiving the certified copy of this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 386 (S/S) of 2014
Ranjan Upreti ………..Petitioner Versus Union of India & others ………..Respondents
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)
Mr. Anil K. Bisht, Advocate, present for the petitioner.
2
before him, he shall decide the same as early as possible but definitely within a period of 12 weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 22.03.2014
ML
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the approprite authority can be directed to dispose of the pending appeal within a fixed time frame.
Ranjan Upreti
Union of India
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
