Court disposed of a writ petition concerning the re-nomination of teacher posts, ruling it should follow the terms of the earlier judgment in Badri Singh Bhainsora.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No.2115 of 2014
Smt. Rashmi Joshi ……….Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ….… Respondents
Present: Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Pandey, learned Brief Holder for the State/respondents.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)
2
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 09.12.2014
ML
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition should be disposed of on the same terms as in the previously decided Writ Petition No.1204 (S/S) of 2014.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No.1204 (S/S) of 2014, Badri Singh Bhainsora Vs. State of Uttarakhand & othersAffirmed¶6
Smt. Rashmi Joshi
State of Uttarakhand
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
