Disposed

Roshan Lal and Others v. State Of Uttarakhand and Others

Uttarakhand HC16 Oct 2014WPMS/2345/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-judge order disposing of multiple miscellaneous and revision petitions. Issues include granting extensions for filing affidavits, recording documents, issuing notices, and permitting withdrawal with liberty.

What did the court decide?

Granted extensions for filing affidavits, recorded documents, issued notices, adjourned petitions, and permitted withdrawal with liberty to file before Session Judge.

Roshan Lal and Others Vs State Of Uttarakhand and Others — Uttarakhand HC (2014) — LawSathi Research

¶1

WPMS No. 2345 of 2014

¶2

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶3

Mr. Dinesh Gahatori, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶4

Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand/respondents.

¶5

Learned counsel for the parties submits that present petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 19.09.2014 passed by this Court in WPMS No. 2187/2014 therefore, present petition may be disposed of in the same terms.

¶6

Ordered accordingly.

¶7

CLMA No. 11663/2014 stands disposed of.

¶8

SH (Alok Singh, J.) 16.10.2014

¶9

WPMS NO.1691 of 2014

¶10

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶11

Mr. Nagesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. R.C.Arya, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos. 2 & 3.

¶13

For the reason stated in the application, delay in filing the counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent no.3 is condoned. Counter affidavit is taken on record.

¶14

CLMA No. 11428 of 2014 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶15

Let the rejoinder affidavit be filed within three weeks.

¶16

N.P (Alok Singh, J.)

¶17

13.10.2014

¶18

WPMS NO.1150 of 2014

¶19

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶20

Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶21

Mr. R.C.Arya, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos. 1 & 2.

¶22

For the reason stated in the application, supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

¶23

IA No. 3867 of 2014 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶24

N.P (Alok Singh, J.)

¶25

13.10.2014

¶26

WPMS NO.142 of 2014

¶27

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶28

Mr. T.A.Khan, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. A.K.Arya, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶29

Mr. R.C.Arya, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos. 1 to 3.

¶30

For the reason stated in the application, rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record. IA No. 3877 of 2014 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶31

N.P (Alok Singh, J.) 13.10.2014

¶32

WPMS NO.2462 of 2013

¶33

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶34

Mr. D.S.Patni, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶35

Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the respondent.

¶36

On the joint request learned counsel for the parties, adjourned.

¶37

N.P (Alok Singh, J.) 13.10.2014

¶38

WPMS NO.2373 of 2013

¶39

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶40

Mr. G.C.Lakhchaura, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶41

Mr. S.S.Chauhan, Standing Counsel for the respondents.

¶42

For the reason stated in the application, counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 3 is taken on record.

¶43

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted three week’s time to file rejoinder affidavit.

¶44

IA No. 3873 of 2014 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶45

N.P (Alok Singh, J.)

¶46

13.10.2014

¶47

WPMS NO.2200 of 2012

¶48

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶49

Mr. Vijay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶50

Mr. I.P.Kohli, Standing Counsel for the State.

¶51

Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for the respondent nos. 4 and 5.

¶52

For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 and 5 is condoned. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 and 5 is taken on record. CLMA No. 11429 of 2014 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶53

Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within three weeks.

¶54

N.P (Alok Singh, J.) 13.10.2014

¶55

WPMS NO.1972 of 2010

¶56

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶57

None present for the petitioner/applicant.

¶58

Mr. R.C.Arya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no.1.

¶59

Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate for the respondent no.2.

¶60

For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent no. 2 is condoned. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no.2 is taken on record. CLMA No. 11431 of 2014 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶61

Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within three weeks.

¶62

N.P (Alok Singh, J.)

¶63

13.10.2014

¶64

CRLR NO.235 of 2014

¶65

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶66

Let the defects be removed as pointed out by the Registry within a week.

¶67

N.P (Alok Singh, J.) 13.10.2014

¶68

CLCON NO.297 of 2014

¶69

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶70

Mr Sushil Vashisth, Advocate for the applicant.

¶71

Issue notice to the respondents by Registered post A.D in addition to normal mode of service returnable within three weeks.

¶72

N.P (Alok Singh, J.) 13.10.2014

¶73

CRLR NO. 187 of 2014 With CRLR No. 188 of 2014 With CRLR No. 189 of 2014

¶74

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶75

Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate for the revisionist.

¶76

Mr. Raman Kumar Sah, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondent no.1.

¶77

Issue notice to the respondent nos. 2 to 5 by Registered post A.D in addition to normal mode of service returnable within three weeks.

¶78

L.C.R be summoned.

¶79

Let a copy of this order be placed on each of the file.

¶80

N.P (Alok Singh, J.)

¶81

13.10.2014

¶82

C482 NO.1294 of 2014

¶83

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶84

Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶85

On the request of Mr. Neeraj Garg, list after three weeks.

¶86

N.P (Alok Singh, J.) 13.10.2014

¶87

C482 NO.1293 of 2014

¶88

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶89

Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the applicants.

¶90

Mr. Raman Kumar Sah, Deputy Advocate General for the State.

¶91

Mr. Manish Arora, learned counsel for the applicants in view of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Harsh Kapoor vs. Komal Kapoor, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file criminal revision before the Session Judge, Haridwar.

¶92

Permitted to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶93

N.P (Alok Singh, J.) 13.10.2014

¶94

WPMS NO.1161 of 2013

¶95

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

¶96

For the reasons stated in the application, supplementary affidavit as well as rejoinder affidavit are taken on record. Both the applications IA No. 3574 of 2014 and IA No. 3583 of 2014 stand disposed of accordingly.

¶97

On the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, adjourned.

¶98

N.P (Alok Singh, J.) 13.10.2014

Roshan Lal and Others v. State Of Uttarakhand and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Roshan Lal and Others v. State Of Uttarakhand and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satpal and Others Vs Munni Devi

Pravesh Kumar Vs State Of Uttarakhand and Another

Reliance Communication Ltd. Vs National Highway Authority Of India and Another

Anil Sharma Vs State Of Uttarakhand and Another

Anup Naudiyal Vs Smt Rinki Naudiyal

Baldev Singh Rana Vs State Of Uttarakhand and Another