The criminal writ petition was rendered infructuous and dismissed because a chargesheet had been filed against petitioners 1-4, while petitioner 5 was exonerated. The interim order dated 27.09.2012 was made to continue.
Interim order dated 27.09.2012 to continue till submission of chargesheet or final report against petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL-910 OF 2012
U. C. Dhyani, J.
Mr. S. R. S. Gill, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Pradeep Joshi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Brief Holder present for the State.
It is stated by learned counsel for the State that the chargesheet has been filed against the petitioners no.1, 2, 3 & 4, while the petitioner no.5 has been exonerated.
In view of the aforesaid statement of learned Brief Holder, the criminal writ petition has, rendered infructuous and is dismissed as infrucutous. Interim order dated 27.09.2012 shall continue to operate till the submission of the charesheet / final report, as the case may be, against the petitioners before the court concerned and no further.
(U. C. Dhyani, J.)
Dated 13.05.2014
Rawat
Petitioners 1, 2, 3, 4
State
U. C. Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
