The Court dismissed the criminal writ petition as rendered infructuous because a chargesheet had been filed against the petitioners. An interim order continued until the chargesheet submission.
Interim order dated 28.02.2014 continued to operate until submission of chargesheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL-197 OF 2014
U. C. Dhyani, J.
Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. Hari Om Bhakuni, A.G.A. present for the State.
It is stated by learned counsel for the State that the chargesheet has been filed against the petitioners.
In view of the aforesaid statement of learned A.G.A., the criminal writ petition has, rendered infructuous and is dismissed as infrucutous. Interim order dated 28.02.2014 shall continue to operate till the submission of the charesheet against the petitioners before the court concerned and no further.
(U. C. Dhyani, J.)
Dated 27.03.2014
Rawat
Petitioners
State
U. C. Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
