Single judge disposed of the writ petition by directing dismissal on the same terms and conditions as in connected Writ Petition No.750 of 2013, without independent reasoning or legal analysis.
Writ petition dismissed on the same terms as Writ Petition No. 750 of 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Reserved IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 892 of 2013
Vijay Kumar and others ...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …..Respondents
Present :- Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Therefore, the present writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms and conditions as made in Writ Petition No. 750 of 2013 (Mahipal Singh Rathor and others v. State of Uttarakhand) and is hereby dismissed, subject to the terms and conditions of the above writ petition. 3. No order as to costs.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)
30.7.2013
Avneet
Vijay Kumar and others
State of Uttarakhand and others
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
