The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed a writ petition as infructuous since the procedural steps of impeachment against the petitioner had been successfully completed by the time of hearing. A stay application was also disposed of.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; stay application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 170 of 2013 (M/S)
Joginder Singh Bisht
……. Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
……. Respondents
None for the petitioner. Mr. B.P.S. Mer, Brief Holder for the State / respondents no. 1 to 6.
Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J.
None responded for the petitioner even in the revised call.
Mr. B.P.S. Mer, Brief Holder for the State appeared for respondents no. 1 to 6.
It is 03:25 P.M.
2
representing State has confirmed the facts, which were stated before the court on 04.02.2013 jointly by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondents no. 8 and 9.
(U.C. Dhyani, J.) Vacation Judge
Dt. February 06, 2013.
Negi
Joginder Singh Bisht
State of Uttarakhand
U.C. Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
