The court dismissed a criminal writ petition as infructuous after a charge sheet was filed against petitioners. An interim order remains operative regarding tribunal/quasi-judicial status.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to filing of charge sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No. 902 of 2012 Hon’ble U.C.Dhyani, J.
Mr. K.S.Bora, Advocate, present for the writ petitioners.
Ms. Meena Vohara, Brief Holder, present for the State.
Learned counsel representing the State submitted that charge sheet no. 337 of 2012 has been filed against the petitioners. In view of the above development, the criminal writ petition has rendered infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 26.09.2012 will continue to operate till the submission of the charge sheet before the Court concerned and no further.
(U.C.Dhyani, J.) 02.04.2013
Kaushal
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal writ petition has become infructuous due to the filing of a charge sheet.
Writ Petitioners
State
U.C.Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
