The court dismissed a pending revision petition as nonprosecution under Chapter 11 Rule 8 of the High Court Rules, noting the revisionist's absence and failure to correct defects despite having been given opportunities.
The revision petition was dismissed as nonprosecution under Chapter 11 Rule 8 of the High Court Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CLR No. 23 of 2013 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.
None turns up on behalf of the revisionist even in the second revised call and defect has also not been removed despite availing opportunity.
Therefore, in these circumstances, this revision is dismissed in nonprosecution as well as under Chapter 11 Rule 8 of the High Court Rules.
(Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 03.04.2015
Nadim
Servesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
