Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed for want of prosecution. The appellant did not appear; the respondent was represented by the Advocate General of Allahabad.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C-482 Petition No. 574 of 2010 Hon’ble U.C.Dhyani, J.
None appears for the applicant, even in the revised call.
Ms. Mamta Bisht, learned AGA, is present for the respondent no. 1.
Petition under Section C-482 Cr.P.C. No. 574 of 2010 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(U.C.Dhyani, J.) 24.10.2013
Kaushal
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Applicant
The Respondent
C. Dhyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
