Himanshu Agarwal v. State Of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2013 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Mr. R. K.…
of 2013 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Mr. R. K.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA 1 No. 944 of 2013 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.
Mr. R. K. Singh, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. K.S. Rautela, AGA for the State.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this bail application. Permitted to be withdrawn.
(Alok Singh, J.) 26.07.2013
SKS
Implying the Applicant (Name not specified)
The State
Alok Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court