The petitioner sought equivalence of his degree as a B.Ed. The bench held that granting equivalence is outside the court's domain and assigned to experts. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed without interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 949 of 2003
Dhanbir Chand … Petitioner
Vs
The State of Uttaranchal & others … Respondents
Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate, present for the petitioner Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Additional Chief Standing Counsel, present for the State
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)
The petitioner seeks equivalence “Shiksha Alankar” (Kanpur University), which the petitioner says may be recognised as B.Ed. in the State of Uttarakhand. The State counsel on the other hand denies such equivalence and says that in the State of Uttarakhand “Shiksha Alankar” is not equivalent to B.Ed.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)
03.09.2012 Aswal
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court has the authority to grant equivalence to the petitioner's qualification 'Shiksha Alankar' as a B.Ed. degree in the State of Uttarakhand.
Dhanbir Chand
The State of Uttaranchal
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
