Dismissed
Satish Chandra Sharma v. State and Ors.
Uttarakhand HCWPSB/530/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
OF 2002 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble B.C.…
What the court decided
AI extract
OF 2002 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble B.C.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPSB NO.530 OF 2002 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J.
Sri N.S. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted at bar that the petitioner has been allocated to Uttaranchal Pay Jal Nigam and he is working as such. Therefore, the petition has rendered infructuous.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed being infructuous.
(B.C.K., J.) (P.C.V., J.)
01.05.2006 ASWAL
Petitioner
P.C. Verma
B.C. Kandpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court