Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AO No. 305 of 2005
Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J.
Case called out twice.
None has appeared on behalf of the appellant to argue the case. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(B.C.K., J.) (P.C.V., J.) 01.07.2006 ASWAL
P.C. Verma
B.C. Kandpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
