on 28th February, 2007 on 1st March, 2007. As such, the period of revised pension from 1st March, 2007 to 31st December, 2008 was not given to the present petitioner after retirement. As such, the revised pay scale benefit during the service period of present petitioner from 1st January, 2006 to 28th February, 2007 in the revised pay scale of Rs.37,400/- - Rs.67,000/- + AGP Rs.9,000/- was not given particularly by not giving arrear of pay and allowances to the present petitioner. Similarly the pensionary benefit in the revised pay scale of Rs.37400/- Rs.67,000/- + AGP Rs.9,000/- w.e.f. 1st March, 2007 to 31st December, 2008 was not given as arrear of pension to the present petitioner. This is the totally discrimination to the petitioner by the respondents as because in the Notification dated 2nd February, 2010, the Govt. of Tripura has accepted the revised University Grants Commission pay scale and implemented it and in the first page at page-3, it was specifically stated that financial assistance referred to in sub clause-A above shall be provided for the period from 1st January, 2006 to 31st March, 2010 and in sub clause-A, it was stated that financial assistance from the Central Govt. to the State Govt. opting to revised pay scale of teachers and other equivalent covered under scheme shall be limited to the extent of 80% of additional expenditure involved in the implementation of the revision and Clause-B states that the State Government opting for revision of pay shall meet the remaining 20% of additional expenditure from its own source. Now, if this is the position then the respondents had received the money from the Central Govt. in this respect for providing arrear of pay and arrear of pension on the revised pay scale w.e.f. 1st January, 2006 to 28th February, 2007 and on 1st March, 2007 to 31st December, 2008 but this was not done by giving arrear of pay and pension to the present petitioner.”
