7. Mr. Majumder, learned Government Advocate has submitted that in view of the decision of the Principal Secretary, Health, as stated and in contemplation that the Finance Department would accord ex post facto sanction of the said amount, but the Finance Department had declined to approve such proposition for incentivizing the employees by way of giving honorarium. Thus, the petitioner was asked to deposit the said amount on the face of an audit objection. Be that as it may, there cannot be any different opinion that the petitioner is not entitled to have any additional remuneration for attending the camps in absence of any Rule or Policy of the government. However, it appears that in view of the decision reflected in the Order No. 29 [at page 13 of the reply filed by the respondents], the entire action was taken. In the said note, the Principal Secretary, Health approved the proposal for making payment of remuneration to the employees like the petitioner. Later on, however, it is available on record that the Finance Department did not approve such payment.
