The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel with liberty to institute a civil suit in the competent court of competent jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| W.P.(C) No. 1085 of 2017 |
|
|---|---|
| Noting by Officer or Serial Date Advocate No |
Office notes, reports, orders or Proceedings with signature |
| T 29.08.2 |
BEFORE HE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA 017 |
| Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner at the outset has submitted that he has instruction to withdraw this writ petition with liberty reserved to take appropriate action available at law including institution of the suit in the civil court of the competent jurisdiction. Prayer stands allowed. This writ petition stands |
|
| dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to take appropriate action available at law including institution of the suit in the same subject matter in the civil court of the competent jurisdiction. Mr. G.S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appears for the state- respondents. JUDGE |
Moumita
Page 1 of 1
Petitioner
State-respondents
S. Talapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
