5. Mr. Dutta, learned counsel has submitted that the Tribunal while making the award has not properly considered the monthly income of the claimant-appellant as she was doing farming on her own land and carrying on the business of selling puffed-rice. Her monthly income was much more but her monthly income has been assessed at Rs. 4,000/- per month. However, Mr. Dutta, learned counsel, has submitted that the tribunal ought to have determined the reduction of the income for the damage that has been suffered by the appellant and also the loss of future prospect. That apart, he has submitted that there has been substantive loss of amenities in life for the injuries that has been suffered by the claimant appellant but all these components of compensation have not been taken into consideration. Mr. Dutta, learned counsel has further submitted that Rs. 30,000/has been awarded as the cost of treatment, Rs. 10,000/- for pain and sufferings and a further sum of Rs.30,000/- for becoming 30% disabled as loss of capacity of income. Thus, the total sum of Rs.70,000/- has been awarded which according to him, is inadequate and unreasonable.
