Rakhi Choudhury and Anr. v. the State of Tripura and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
NO.36/2017 Page 1 of 1 CRL.PETN. NO.36/2017…
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of petition allowed with liberty to file a fresh case
NO.36/2017 Page 1 of 1 CRL.PETN. NO.36/2017…
Withdrawal of petition allowed with liberty to file a fresh case
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.PETN. NO.36/2017
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. T. VAIPHEI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
Present: For the petitioners : Mr. G.S. Bhattacharji, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.C. Debnath, Addl. P.P.
13.06.2017.
On the prayer of Mr. G.S. Bhattacharji, the learned counsel for the petitioners, which is not opposed by Mr. R.C. Debnath, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the respondents, he is allowed to withdraw the criminal petition with a liberty to file a fresh case.
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Pulak
CRL.PETN. NO.36/2017
Page 1 of 1
Petitioner(s)
Respondent(s)
T. Vaiphei
S. Talapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court