Ramendra Debbarma v. the State of Tripura
Case brief
What is this about?
The Chief Justice dismissed a criminal petition questioning the forfeiture of a surety bond, holding it misconceived. The court directed the petitioner to approach the trial court to seek remission of the penalty under Section 446(3) Cr.P.C., noting the petitioner had already legally appeared.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to approach the trial court to invoke jurisdiction under Section 446(3) Cr.P.C. for remission of the penalized amount.