Sudam Mahajan v. State Of Tripura and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN CRL.A. NO.22/2017 Page 1 of 1 I.A.…
IN CRL.A. NO.22/2017 Page 1 of 1 I.A.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I.A. NO.01/2017 IN CRL.A. NO.22/2017
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. T. VAIPHEI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
Present:
For the applicant : None. For the respondents : Mr. S. Sarkar, P.P., Mr. S. Rahaman, Advocate.
05.12.2017.
No representation from the applicant.
Heard Mr. S. Sarkar, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, and Mr. S. Rahaman, the learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3.
The application is dismissed in default of prosecution.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Pulak
I.A. NO.01/2017 IN CRL.A. NO.22/2017
Page 1 of 1
Unknown Applicant
State
T. Vaiphei
S. Talapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court