Jella Yadaiah Vs The State of Telangana

¶1

[³³⁰²¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD .^{(SpeeialOrigina!Jurisdiction)}

¶3

TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. SARATH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 60 OF 2026

¶7

Between

¶8

Jella Yadaiah, S/o Late Jalla Sathaiah Aged about 67 years, occ.Business R/o H.No.5-121, Ghattuppal village Gha-ftup pal Mandal, Nalgonda district Telangana State.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Stamps

¶12

^{and Regiskation)Department SecretariatBuildings Hyderabad, T.S.}

¶13

1. The lnspector General of Stamps and Registratiohs Department, State of Telangana, Putlibowli, Nizamshahi road, Hyderabad, T.S.

¶14

The District Registrar, Stamps and Registration, Nalgonda, Nalgona district . T.S.

¶15

The Sub-Registrar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda district, T.S.

¶16

Jglla Shanmukh!, S/o Late Veeraiah Aged about 71 years, Occ. Agriculture Rl/o Gattuppal village and Mandal, Nalgorida district T.S.

¶17

Jella Lingaiah, S/o Late Jella Sathaiah Aged 61 years, Occ. Business R/o Ghattuippal Nalgonda district T.S

¶18

7 . Jella Krishnaiah, S/o Late Jella Sathaiah Aged 53 years, occ. Business R/o Ghaftuppal Nalgonda district

¶19

Jella Bhavana Rushi, S/o Late Jella Sathaiah Aged 50 years, Occ.Busienss R/o Ghattuppal Nalgonda district

¶20

Jella Ashok, S/o Late Jella Sathaiah Aged 47 years, Occ.Buisess R/o Ghattuppal Nalgonda district

¶21

10.Jella Anjaiah, S/o Sugreevudu aged about 56 years, Occ.Weaver R/o H.NO.10-109, Padmashali colony Ghattuppal, Nalqonda district

¶22

ll.Karnati Yadaiah, S/o Laxmi Narsu aged 61 yearas, Occ. Busienss R/o H.No. 7i-93 Ghattuppal Nalgodna district

¶23

Nelanti Swamy, S/o Late Gurunadam Aged 78 years, Occ.Business R/o H.No.5-30, Kanakadurga Stret, Ghattuppal Nalgonda district

¶24

1 3. Nelanti P(abahkar, S/o Late Gurunandam Aged 72 years, Occ. Business R/o H. N0. 5-3 1, Kanakadurga Stret, Ghattuppal Nalgonda distrct

¶25

Nelanti Veera Shankar, S/o Late Gurunadham Aged about 65 years, Occ.Business R/o H.No. 5-31/1 Kanakadurga Stret, Ghattuppal, Nalgonda district

¶26

Nelanti Laxminarayana, S/o Late Gurundham Aged'as 58 years, occ. Business R/o H.No. 1-i-8013 Hanuman Nagar, Near Vasavi Bhdvan, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.

¶27

Punna Srinivas, S/o Late Gurunadham, Aged 51 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.5-142 tvlarkandeya Nagar, Chattuppal, Nalgonda district.

¶28

,..RESPONDENTS

¶29

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Gourt may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not cancelling the Lease deed derted 1-2-2025 entered with the respondents 5 to'16 is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 lo invalidate/cance'l the Lease deed dated 1-2-2025 ent€red between with the respondents 5 tr> 16.

¶30

lA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶31

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the resporrdent Nos. 2 to 4 to invalidate/Cancel the Lease deed dated 1-22025 entered between the respondents 5 to 16 forthwith Pendin! disposal of the Writ petition in the interest of^justice.

¶32

Counsel for the l,etitioner: SRI GANESWARA RAO NIDUMUKKALA Counsel for the lRespondent Nos.1 TO 4: SMT. S.SRAVANTHI,

¶33

AGP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION

¶34

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S TO 16: --

¶35

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶36

a

¶37

t I

¶38

IN THE HIGH COURT F'OR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶39

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

No.

Date: O6.OL.2O26

Between:

Jella Yadaiah

.Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana, Rep: by its Principal Secretar5r, Revenue (Stamps and Registration) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & fifteen others

¶47

...Respondents

¶48

ORDER:

¶49

Heard Sri Ganeswzrra Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Smt. S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. With their consent, this writ petition 1S disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

¶50

After arguing for sometime, learned Counsel for the petitioner requested to grant liberty to the petitioner to

¶51

approa,lh competent Civil Court for redressal of grievance

¶52

of the p,etitioner.

¶53

In view of the submission made by both sides, without going into merits of the case, the writ petition is dispose,l of by granting liberty to the petitioner approach competent Civil Court for agitating his rights. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶54

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this

¶55

Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶56

SD'.A.H^{.s. GOWRISHANKAR} STANT^REGI

¶57

,ITRUE^COPY'/ SECTION^OFFICER

¶58

To

¶59