Writ petition filed alleging police interference in a civil land dispute. Court finds complaint closed as civil matter; thus, no interference justified. Writ petition closed without order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t321e I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICETANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 30231 OF2026
Between:
Kamsani Lingam, S/o. Narsaiah,Aged 50 Years, Occ ;agriculture,Ri'/o.H.No.9- 90/2, Rudrangi village and Mandal,Rajanna SircillaDistrict.
,....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of theConstitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate writ,order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the actionof Respondent Nos.3and 4 in interfering with the civil dispute andpressurizingthe petitionerto settlethe dispute in favour of Respondent No.5 in respect of theland bearing Sy.No.207lAA, admeasuring 302.50 Sq. Yards or 02.50 Guntas, situatedat Chinnapur Village, Buggaram Mandal, Jagtial District, as illegal, arbitrary,withoutjurisdiction and contraryto law, apart from being violative of theprinciples of naturaljusticeand the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles,14 and 21 ofthe constitutionof lndia, and consequentlydirect
,,
Respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to interfere with the civil dispute b,etween the petitioner and Respondent No.5 and not to pressurize or compel the petitioner to enter into any settlement, except in accordance with law.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2026
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir:umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent Nos,3 and 4 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and Respondent No.5 and not to harass or pressurize the petitioner in connection with the said dispute, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI BETHEPU DILEEP KUMAR
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4: AGP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : -
The Court made the following ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT.JUSTICE TANGTRALA MADHAVI
DEVI
WRIT PETITION No. 30231of 2026
(CNR No. H8HC010624 162026)
DATE: 11.09.2026
Between:
Kamsani Lingam
...Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana and 4 others
...Respondents
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed alleging that the respondent-police
are interfering into the civil dispute between the petitioner and
respondent No.5.
Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home appearing for respondents
No.1 to 4.
E
TMD,J wP 3023 r 2026
2
*":r_,:_=sE?=i!'
TMD,J \NP 30231 2026
J
complaint lodged by respondent No.5 has already been closed as civil in nature. Therefore, there ls no justification for the
respondent-police to interfere in the civil dispute between the
parties or to pressurize the petitioner to settle the same.
order as to costs
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
To
Sd/-K.V.O.NARSI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII 6 SECTION OFFICER
SA
@^
,/,
C.C. TODAY
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1110912026
ORDER
WP.No.30231 of 2026
HE SI4 r€
9.
6
fi)t
s t)
CLOSING THE W.P
WITHOUT COSTS.
@
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding police interference in a land dispute be disposed of.
Whether the allegations of police interference in a civil dispute are tenable given the closure of the complaint.
Kamsani Lingam
The State of Telangana
Superintendent of Police, Jagital
Circle Inspector of Police, Dharmapuri
Sub Inspector, Buggaram
G. Venneta
Justice Tangirala Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
