Disposed

Mr. Gandham Sadha v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC10 Sept 2026WP/30137/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC seeking a writ of mandamus for demolition of unauthorized structures. The Court disposed of the petition by directing the Deputy Commissioner to act on the representation within four weeks and afford a hearing opportunity to the parties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 4 to act on the representation dated 28.07.2026 and pass orders after hearing within four weeks.

Mr. Gandham Sadha Vs The State of Telangana — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

[³¹⁸³¹

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 30137 OF 2026

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mr. Gandham Sadha, S/o. G. Laxmaiah, Aged about 58 Years, Occ- Business R/o. H.No. 10-05-176, Fathenagar, Hyderabad, Telangana-500018

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Pdncipal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Malkajgiri Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Hyderabad.

¶14

The Zonal Commissioner, Malkajgiri Zone, Malkajgiri Municipal Corporation, Uppal, Hyderabad.

¶15

The Deputy Commissioner, Malkajgiri Municipal Corporation, Bowenpally, Circle No.3, Hyderabad.

¶16

Sri. Darmesh Agarwal, S/o. Late Ramesh Chandra Aganval, Aged 55 years Occ- Bussiness Rt/o. H. No. 7-1-2161N212A, Dharam Karam Road, Jain Anand Apartments, Ameerpet, Hyderabad-500016.

¶17

Sri. Morla Sreenivas, Sio. Morla Vittal Aged 55 years Occ- Business R/o. H. No. 10-4-79, Fathenagar, Near Jhonson Grammar High school, Balanagar, Hyderabad-50001 I

¶18

Sri. Morla Ramesh, S/o. Morla Vittal, Aged 49 years Occ- Business R/o. H. No. 10-4-135, Post Office Road, Fathenagar, Balanagar, Hyderabad500018

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of

¶21

Wdt of Mandamus derclaring the action of respondents No.2 to 4 in not taking steps for removal of unauthorized construction at House property bearing No.'10-5-21i1 and New (PTl No.1141001119) ON PLOT No. F-'12, in Sy.Nos.20,21,22,26 and 27 admeasuring 200.00 liq. Yards equivalenllo 167.2 sq meters situated at Fathenagar village, Balanagar Mandal, GHIVC-3, Bowenpally Circle, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, in pursuant to File No. 001428/GHMC10113411ABPlC23l2025 dt.12.S.2025vide permit No 1844lGHMCl1NC23l2025 dt. 23.07.2025 issued by the respondent No.4 as being illegal, arbitrary and also in contrary to the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, consequently direct the respondents No. 2 to 4 to demolish the unauthorized construction at House property bearing No.10-5-2111 and New (PTI No.1141001119) ON PLOT No. F-12, in Sy.Nos. 20,21 ,22,26 and 27 arlmeasuring 200.00 Sq. Yards equivalent to 167.2 sq meters situated at Fathenagar village, Balariagar lvlandal, GHMC-3, Bowenpally Circle, Medchal-tvlalkajgiri District.

¶22

l.A. NO: 1OF 2026

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppor: of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.2 to 4 to take steps for removal of unauthorized constructlon at House property bearing No.10-5-2111 and New (PTl No.'l 14100'1^'1 19) ON PLOT No. F-12, in Sy.Nos. 20,21 ,22,26 and 27 admeasuring 200.00 Sq. Yards equivalent to '167.2 sq meters situated at Fathenagar village, Balanagar Mandal, GHMC-3, Bowenpally Crrcle, [/ed:hal-Ma lkajgiri District, pending disposal of the Writ petition.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.ATCHUTA RAM

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR MMC

¶27

'Ihe Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶29

AT HYDERABAD

¶30

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶31

WRIT PETITION No.3O137 of 2026 (CNR No.HBHcO1O61oO52O26)

Dated: 10.09.2026

Between

Gandham Sadha

...PETITIONER

And

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others

¶38

...RESPONDENTS

¶39

ORDER:

¶40

Mr. G. Madhusudhan ReCd./, iearneci standing counsel fo r- respondents No.2 to 4 - Malkajgiri Mlnicipal Corpcration (MMC), submitted that the representation of the petitioner dated 28.07.2026 regarding unauthorized construction made by the respondents No.5 to 7 in the property bearing No.10-5-21/1 and New (PTI No.1141001119) on Plot No.F-12, Sy.Nos.20, 2t, 22, 26 and 27, admeasuring 200 sq. yards, Fatherragar Village, Balanagar Mandal, GHMC-3, Bowenpally Circle, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, will be considered in accordance rryith law.

¶41

Recording the submission of the learned standing counsel, the writ petition is disposed of l',iith a direction to the respondent No.4 to act upon the represerr[atron of the petitioner dated

¶42

28.07.2026, cy affor-ding opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the respc,ndents No,5 to 7 and pass orders, in accordance with law, with a p3riod of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Horvever, as this order is passed without entering into the merits of the case, notice to respondents No.5 to 7 is dispensed v/ith and if the respondents No.5 to 7 are, in any way, aggrieved by this order, they are at liberty to approach this Court seeking modif cation of this order.

¶43

The mis;celianeous applications, pending if any, shall stand

¶44

closed. There :;hall be no order as costs.

¶45

SD/. AHMED ABDULLA KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Principal lSecretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Sercretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

¶51

The Commissicner, Malkajgiri Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad.

¶52

The Zonal Conrmissioner, Malkajgiri Zone, Malkajgiri Municipal Corporation, Uppal, Hyderabad.

¶53

The Deputy Ccmmissioner, Malkajgiri Municipal Corporation, Bowenpally, Circle No.3, Hyderabad.

¶54

One CC to SRI V.ATCHUTA RAM, Advocate [OPUC]

¶55

One CC to SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR MMC [OPUC]

¶56

Two CCs to GF FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana. al Hyderabad [OUT]

¶57

Two CD Copies ,b, BSR

CC TODAY

HIGH^COURT

DATED:^10/09/2026

ORDER

WP.No.30137^{of 2026}

¶63

1tl E ST 4r€
(
o
rJ Il SEP 2026 ],C:
f

D6
SI,AT

¶64

DISPOSING^{OF THE WRIT PETITION'}

¶65

WITHOUT^GOSTS

¶66

1
L
c..
i<br>

Mr. Gandham Sadha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Gandham Sadha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases