Pandiri Ajay, v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged the Miryalaguda Municipality's failure to issue a fresh tender for the NTR Municipal Shopping Complex after the earlier tender expired, and sought protection from eviction from Shop No. 28 without due process. The Municipality submitted a written undertaking that it had no intention to act arbitrarily or dispossess the petitioner except in accordance with law. Recording this undertaking, the High Court disposed of the writ petition and the two Section 151 CPC applications without any order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition and miscellaneous applications disposed of after recording the Municipality's undertaking not to act arbitrarily or dispossess the petitioner except in accordance with law; no order as to costs.