Dismissed

Peeroji Bhagya Laxmi, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Sept 2026WP/29507/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ to correct a property built-up area from 7476 sq.'ft' to '600 sq. ft'. Court directed authorities to consider representation after holding opportunity, disposing petition without entering into merits.

What did the court decide?

Respondents 2 to 4 directed to consider petitioner's representation and grant opportunity of personal hearing within 4 weeks.

Peeroji Bhagya Laxmi, Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

[³¹⁸³¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 29507 oF 2026 CNR NO. HBHCOIO 609852026

¶8

Between:

¶9

PEEROJI BHAGYA LAXMI, Wo. Late. pEEROJ| SANJEEVA RAO, aged about 58 years, Occupation.-Housewife, R/o. H.No. 12-10-337t4t2tA, t/edi Bavi, Sithaphalmandi, Secunderabad - 50006.1.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, rep by its principle secretary, municipal administration and urban development department, secretariat, Hyderabad

¶13

The commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad -^{District, Office. CCComplex, Lower Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad_506063.} 3. The Deputy Commissioner, GHMC Khairatabad circle_35, Hyderabad, Telangana.

¶14

TheZonal Commissioner, GHMC, Khairtabad, Hyderabad

¶15

.,.RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Artide 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High courthjy be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the natuie of writ of lland.amys^{Directing Respondent No. 3 to take action against the Representation} Daled. 181412026 in PTIN No, 1 1 006012'l 5 regards to correction of 7476 square feet to 600 Square feet in the Total Property House No. 6-1-sg5lBt2, admeasuring g0 sq. yards or 66.88 sq meters, with an builtup area of 600 sq.Ft. of R.c.c.Roof,-situated al Maruthi Nagar, Khairatabad, under the limits of the GHMC Khairatabad circle, Hyderabad Diskict and dispose off the same in accordance with the law

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S JMS LAW FIRM ADVOCATES AND ASSOCIATES

¶18

counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : Gp FoR MUNrcrpAL ADMrNrsrRATroN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2to4: SRI M. ARUN KUMAR

¶20

SC FOR GHMC

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE^{STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{B. VIJAYSEN REDDY}

¶24

WRIT PETITON No.29507 0F²⁰²⁶ CNR No.HBHC01060985202

¶25

DATE: 08-09-2026

¶26

Between:

¶27

Mrs. Peeroji Bhagya^Laxmi

¶28

... Petitioner

¶29

AND

¶30

The State of Telangana Rep. By its Principal^Secretary, Municipal Administration^{and Urban DevelopmentI)epartment,} Secretariat,^Hy derabad,^{and others}

¶31

. Respondents

¶32

ORDER:(ORAL)

¶33

Heard M/s. JMS Law Firm,^{learned counsel for the petitioner} and Mr. Midde Arun^{Kumar, leamed standing counselfor Greater} Hyderabad Municipal^{Corporation(GHMC), appearing for} respondent Nos.2^{to 4.}

¶34

l-eamed standing^{counsel for GHMCsubmittedthat} respondent-GHMC^{autholitieswould considerthe representation} datedt8.04.2026ofthepetitionerforcorrectingthebuiltupareain

¶35

¶36

BVR,J W.P. No.29507 of 2026

¶37

respect of the subject property and orders will be passed in

¶38

accordance with law

¶39

Recording the aforesaid su ssion of leamed standing counsel for GHMC, without enterin in to the merits of the case, the urit petition is disposed of, respondent Nos.2 to 4, as the case may be, to consider the rep entation dated 18.04.2026 of the petitioner for correcting the built p area from 7476 sqtare feet to 600 square feet in respect of th property bearing H.No.6-1585lBl2 admeasuring 80 square y situated at Maruthi Nagar, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, and pass or ,^{in accordance with law,} by affording opportunity of personal to the petitioner, and all other concerned/interested person , within a period of four⁽⁴⁾ weeks from the date of receipt of a co of this order. No costs

¶40

As a sequel thereto, miscell eous applications, if any,

¶41

pending in the writ petition stand closed

¶42

//TRUE COPY//

¶43

SD/-A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Principle^{Secretary, Municipal Administration And Urban Development} Department,^{Secretariat, Hyderabad}

¶48

The commissioner,^{GreaterHyderabad Municipal Corporation,Hyderabad} District, Office.^{CCComplex, Lower Tank Bund Road' Hyderabad-500063.}

¶49

The^{Deputycommissioner,GHMC Khairatabad circle-3S,Hyderabad,} Telangana.

¶50

f he Zonal Commissioner, GHMC, Khairtabad, Hyderabad 5. One CC to M/S JMS LAW F|RM ADVOCATES AND ASSOCTATES Advocate IoPUC]

¶51

Two CCs to GP FOR MUN|C|PAL ADM|N|STRAT|ON AND URBAN _^{DEVELOPMENT,HighCourt for the State of Telanqana, at Hyderabad} [OUT] 7. One CC to SRt l/ ARUN KUMAR, SC FOR GHMb topucl 8. Two CD Copies

E}M I]SR Ie

CC TODAY

HIGH COURT

DATED: 08/09/2026

ORDER WP.No.29507 ot 2026

¶57

1 r{E
I
o
U 10 sEP m !oz
* *
ota-
r. .) ., ITCH

¶58

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT^PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶59

w
%
l0 Ir L I

Peeroji Bhagya Laxmi, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Peeroji Bhagya Laxmi, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases