The High Court of Telangana, Special Original Jurisdiction, hearing writ petitions filed by Tata companies against Labour Court orders allowing additional evidence and documents in Industrial Dispute cases where domestic enquiries were upheld to be valid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[321s ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION Nos. 10224.10216. 5868, 11092.11093. 11094. 11095 11096 11100 11101 11103 11104 11105 1110611107 11108 12142 12143 12144 12145 12146 12147 12148 12145 12150 12151 12152 12153 '|.2154 12155 12156 12157 12159 12160, 14625.14627.14629 &14630 0F 2021 i i.'
WRIT PETITION NO: 10 2240F 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerosp ace SEZ, Plot No 1/D, S No. 656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla(v) lbrahimpatnam(M) Ranga Reddy District, vTelangana 301510 Represented by its SeniorManager.Mr. Ravi Kumar Allada
...PETITIONER
AND
S.Venkatesham, S/o Salla Anjaiah Age 28 years, Occ. Associate, Fyo H. No 2-18, Pothanpally, Chegunta Mandal,Medak Districl' 502247
...RESP.NDENT
' Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitutionof lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction moreparticularly onein the natureof writ of Certiorari and toquash and set asidethe Common order dated1810212021 passed by the Hon.ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in1 .A. No. 78 of2o21and LA. No. 79 of 2021 in T.D. No.31 of 2019 with regard to additional evidenceand received documents in the interestof justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
2
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavlt filed in support of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Common Order dated 1810212021 in l.A. No.78 of 2021 and l.A. No. 79 of 2O21 in l.D. No. 31 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the proceedings in l.D. No. 31 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ petition.
lA NO:'f OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l-D. No. 31 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11 2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No- 31 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed tn W.P. No. 10224 of 2021 until further order.
3
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. T ANAND SUBRAMANIAM
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI ABIDHUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO: 10216 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerospace SEZ, Plot No.'1lD, Sy No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (v) lbrahimpatnam (M) Ranga Reddy Diskict, Telangana- 501510 Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Ravi Kumar Allada
...PET|TIONER AND
Sri Mallikarjun Chinnappa Mhanta, S/o Chinnappa, Age 28years, Occ. Associate, Ryo. Plot No 122, New Grampanchayat, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District- 500058
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 1810212021 passed by the Honorable Labour Court-'t, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 76 of 2o21and l.A. No. 77 of 2021 in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 with regard to additional evidence and received documents in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Common Order dated 181O212021 in l.A. No. 76 of 2021 and l.A. No. 77 ol 2021 in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Honorable Labour Court-'1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to stay the proceedings in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Honorable Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writpetition.
1
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased topass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 2O.11 .2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D.No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court -l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to extend the order dated 09.01.2024passed in W.P. No.1O216 of 2021 until further order.
lA NO: 3 OF 2021
Between:
Sri Mallikarjun Chinnappa Mhanta, S/o Chinnappa, Age 28years, Occ.Associate, R/o. Plot No.122, New Grampanchayat, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITION ERYRESPONDENT
AND
Aditya M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerospace SEZ, Plot No. 1/D, Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District,St elanganaNo. 656, -Rep. by its Senior Manager, Mr. Ravi Kumar Allada.
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1021612021 on 2010412021.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T. ANAND SUBRAMANIAM
5
Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO: 5868 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656,Ad itya Nagar, Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District- 501510,T elangana Represented by its General lvlanager, Mr. Arjun Myne
...PETITIONER
AND
Shiva Kumar H.T., S/o Thippe Swamy, Aged about 29years, R/o.37-76,77,Sri Krishna Enclave, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, RangaReddy District, Telangana
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court maybe pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common orderpassed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 18 of 2021, l.A. No. 143 of 2019, l.A.No. 71 of 2021 and l.A. No. 150 ot 2O21 in l.D. No. 73 ot 2017 daled1810212021 wilh regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documentsand evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity,otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
1A NO: 1 OF 2!21
Petition under Section151 CPCpraying thatin thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt maybe pleasedto suspend the operation of thelmpugned Order daled1810212021andstayall further proceedings in l.A. No. 18 of 2021,1.A.No. 143of 20'19,l.A. No. 7'l of 2021 and l.A. No. 150 ot 2021 in l.D. No.73 of2O17on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto dispense with the filing of thecertified copy and xerox copyof the docketorder
6
dated 20.'1 1 .2023 passed in lD No.73 of 2017 on thef ile of Labour Court-|, at Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased topass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 73 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to extend the order dated 2112.2023passed in W.P. No. 5868 of 2021 until further orders.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
Shiva Kumar H.T., S/o Thippe Swam v, Rr/o. 37-76, 77, Sri Krishna Enclave, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana
...PETITIONERYRESPONDENT
AND
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagal, Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne
.,.RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to vacate the interim orders daled 25lOBl2O21 in W.P.No. 5868 of 2021 on 3010612021.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN
l
WRIT PETITION NO: 11092OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656,Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District- 501510, TelanganaRepresented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne
AND
...PET|TIONER
Anand Balasaheb Jadhav, S/o. BalasahebUmaji Jadhav,Aged 30 years, Rl/o. H.No. 102-2, Old Gram Panchayath, Badangpet, Saroornagar(M) Ranga ReddyDistrict, Telangana- 5ooo58
...RESP.NDENT
Petition under Nlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the HighCourt may be pleased to issue an order, direction moreparticularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and toquash and set asidethe Commonorderdated18.02.20201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 17 of 2021, l.A. No. 134 ol 2021, and l.A. No. 135 of 2021 in l.D.No. 7of 2018with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receivingadditional documentsand evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffergrave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleasedto suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 17 of 2021, l.A. No. 135 ot 2021 and l.A.No. 134 ol 2021 in l.D. No.7 of 2018on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleasedto dispense with the filing of CertifiedCopyand Xerox Copyof the docketorder daled 20.11.2O23 in l.D. No.7 of2018 on the file of Labour Court- l, Hyderabad.
8
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased topass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 7 of 2O18 on the file of Labour Court- I, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Courtnray be pleasedto extend the order dated 12-01-2024passed in W.P. No.11092 of2021 untilfurther order.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO: 11093 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Teiangana Representedby its General Manager, ltr'lr. Arjun Myne
...PETITIONER
AND
Vinod Sahebro More S/o Sahebrao More, Age 27yearc, Occ:Associate,Rl/o.Plot No 86/P, Shivsainagar, Badangpet, Hyderabad- 500058
...RES'ONDENT
Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common orderpassed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No.86 ot 2021, l.A. No. 87 of 2021in l.D.No. 27 oI 2019 daled 1810212021 with regard to receiving additional evidence and documents on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
9
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHighCourtmay be pleasedto suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled1810212021in l.A. No.86 of 2021 and l.A. No. 87 ol 2O21in LD. No. 27 of 2019on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleasedto pass orders eschewing lhe additional evidence let inon 20.11.2023 on behalfof the Respondent Workman in l.D-No.27 ot 2O19 onthe file ofLabourCourt - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 F 2024
Petition under Section'151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may bepleasedto dispense with the filing of Certified Copy andXerox Copyof the docket order daled 20.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 27 of2019 on thefile of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 oF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto extend the order dated 12.01.2024passed in W.P. No. 1 1093of 2021 until further orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRISHIREENSETHNABARIA
Counsel for the Respondent:SRIRAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM
l0
WRIT PETITION NO: 11094 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by ils General Manager, It4r. Arjtm Myne
AND
...PETITIONER
Sharanappa, S/o Subhash, Aged: about 34years, Occupation: Associate, R/oH.No-1-103/'1, Sama Street-2, Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District. Telangana.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and toquash and set aside the Common orderpassed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 47 of 2021,1.A. No. 101 of 2021,1.A. No. 1OO ot 2021 and lA. No. 48 of 2021 in LD. No. 97 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardshrp and loss.
IA O:'l F 2021
Petrtion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 47 of 2021,l.A. No. 101 of 2021,1.A. No. 100 of 2021 and l.A. No. 48 of 2021 in l.D. No. 97 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-'l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 97 ot 2O18 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
ll
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleasedto pass orders eschewing the additional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 97 of 2018 on the file ofLabourCourt - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court maybe pleasedto extend the order dated 12.01.2024passed in W.P.No. 11094of 2021 until further orders.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
Sharanappa, S/o Subhash, Aged: 34years, Occ:Associate,R/o. H.No-1-103/1, Sama Stieet-2, Badangpet,Ranga ReddyDistrict, Telangana,
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited,Sy.No.65O NdltyqNagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal,'Ranga Reddy District -501510, TelanganaRep by its Generai Manager' Mr' Arjtm Myne
...REspoNDENTMRrrpETraoNER
Petition under Section'15'l CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof thepetition,the High Court maybe pleased to vacate the order dated: 27 .04.2021passedin l.A.No.1 ol 2021 in W.P.No. 1 1094 of 2021 in the interests of Justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI SHIREENSETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent:SRI RAVICHANDRABEJJARAM
)
WRIT PETITION NO: 11095 OF 202't
Between:
M/s- Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne
...PETITIONER
AND
Lokesha A, S/o Anjainappa, Aged: about 36 years, Occupation Specialist, Rl/o. Plot No. 33, H.No.1-68/4 Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District-500058
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common orderpassed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in 1.A. No.88 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 89 of 2021 in l.D. No. 26 of 2019 dated 1810212021 with regard to receiving additional evidence and documents on record in the interest ofjustice and equtty, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 in l-A. No.88 of 2021 and l.A. No. 89 o'f 2021 in l.D. No. 26 ot 2O19 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evrdence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 26 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
t3
lA NO: 2 oF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, the High Court maybe pleasedto dispense with the filing of Certified Copyand Xerox Copyof the docketorder dated 20.1 1.2023 in l.D. No. 26 of 2019on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin thecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court maybe pleasedto extend the order dated 12-01-2024passed in W.P. No. 11095of 2021 until further orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNABARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: -
WR]T PETITION No 11096 0F 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656,Aditya Nagal' Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga ReddyDistrict -501510, Telangana Representedby its General Manager, Mr. ArjunMyne
...PETITIONER
AND
Ganesh Prakash, S/o PrakashNane, Aged:about 34 years, Occupation. Specialist, Fl/o Flat No.204, Sri Sai Residency, Turkenjal, lbrahimpatnam Mandal Ranga Reddy District' Telangana'
...RES'.NDENT
Petition underpi.ticle 226 of theConstitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction moreparticularly onein thenatureof writ of Certiorari and toquash and setaside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad inLA. No.43 ol 2021,1.A. No. 105 of 2021, l.A. No. 1O4 of 2021 and LA. No. 44 of 2021in l.D. No. 95 of 2018dated1810212021wilh regard to amendment of ClaimStatement, receiving additional documentsand evidence on record in theinterest of justice and equity, otherwisethe Petitioner will suffer grave hardship andloss.
l4
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1810212021 in LA. No.43 of 2021,l.A. No. 105 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 104 of 2021 and LA. No. 44 of 2021 in l.D. No. 95 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad.
IAN O:1OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 95 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 95 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 11096 of 2021 until further order.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
Ganesh Prakash, S/o Prakash Nane, RJo. Flat No.204, Sri Sai Residency, Turkenj al, lbrahimpatnam Mandal Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.
...PETITION EFYRESPONDENT
AND
l5
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited,Sy.No.656,Aditya Nagal' Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga ReddyDishict -501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjunlr,lyne
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit flled in suppo( of thepetition,the High Court may be pleasedto vacate the interim orderpassed in W.P.No. 1106of 2021 on 27.04.2021.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNABARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABIDHUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO: 11100 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar,Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict- 501510,Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. ArjunMyne
...PETITIONER
AND
C Manjunatha Setty, S/o.C. Mallikarjuna Setty, Aged about 35 years, Rl/o. Triveninagar, Balapur X Roads Meerpet, Rangareddy District
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying lhat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Courtmaybe pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and toquash and set aside the Common orderpassed by theHonorable Labour Court-l, Hyderabad in LA. No.3of 2021,l.A. No.146 ot 2021,1.A. No.147 of 2021 and l.A. No.4 of 2021 in l.D. No. 76 ot 2017 daled1810212021with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents andevidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitionerwill suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may be pleasedto suspend the operation of the Impugned Order dated18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 3 of
16
2021, l.A.No.4 of 2019, LA. No. 146 of 2021,l.A No. 147 of 2021 in LD. No.76of 2017 on the file of Honorable Labour Court-l , Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy and xerox copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 passed in lD No.76 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court-|, at Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepelition, the High Court may bepleased topass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20j1.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 76 of 2O17 on the file of Labour Court -I, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to extend the order dated 21 .122023passed in W.P. No.11'100 of 2021 until further orders.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
C Manjunatha Setty, S/o.C. Mallikarjuna Setty, R/o. Triveninagar, Balapur XRoads Meerpet, Rangareddy District.
AND
...PET|IONER/RESPONDENT
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Rep. byits General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne
...RESPONDENTM/RIT PETITIONER
I7
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay bepleasedto vacate the order dated: 2710412021passed in l.A.No.1 of2O21 in W.P.No.11100 ol 2021 in the interests of Justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 11101OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Representedby its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne
...PET|TTONER AND
Manish Kumar, S/o Munshilal Choudhari R/o H.No. 6-801111, SLNS Colony, Balapur X Roads, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana- 500053
...RES,ONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indla praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in lhe nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common orderpassed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 45 ot 2021,1.A. No. 103 of 2021, l.A.No. 1O2 of 2021 and l.A. No. 46 of 2021 in l.D. No. 96 of 2018 dated18.O2.2O21 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documentsand evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleasedto suspend the operation of the Impugned Order daled 18.02.2021in l.A. No. 45 of 2021,1.A. No. 103 of 2021,1.A. No. 102 of2O21 and l.A. No.46 of2021 in l.D. No. 96 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lri
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleasedto dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copyof thedocket order dated 20.1 1.2023 in l.D. No. 96 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court- l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmaybe pleasedto pass orders eschewing the additional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023on behalfof the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 96 of 2018 on thefile of LabourCourt - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 oF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto extend the order dated 12-01-2024passedin W.P. No.1'l 101of 202'luntil further order.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNABARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABIDHUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO: 11'103 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, AdityaNagql, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District-501510, Telangana Representedby its General Manager, Ivlr. Arjun lt/yne
...PETITIONER
AND
Dibyapratap Mohanta, S/o Birendra Mohanta Age 23years, Occ.Associate,R/o H. No 6-i 1-9/A, Annapurna nagar Colony, Badangpet, Hyderabad-500058
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the alfidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
l9
pleased to issue an order, direction moreparticularly one in the natureof writ of certiorari and toquash and set asidethe commonorder dated 18.02.202'1passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1,Hyderabad in l.A. No. 84 of 2021andl A No 85 of 2021 in LD. No. 28 oI2019with regard to additional evidence and received documents in the interestof justice and equity,otherwise the Petitionerwill suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Courl may be pleasedto suspend the operationof the lmpugned Order dated18.02.2021in l.A. No' 84 of 2021 and l.A. No. 85of 2021 in 1.D. No. 28 ot 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court maybe pleased to pass orders eschewing theadditional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman inlD No 28 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad
IANO:2 OF 2024
Petition under section1 51CPC praying that in the circumslancesstated in the affidavit filedin support of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto dispense with thefilingof certifiedcopy and Xerox Copy of the docketorder daled 20.11.2023 in l.D.No. 28 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad'
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under section151 cPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto extend the order dated12.01 .2024 passedin w.P. No. 1 1 103of 2021 untilfurther order.
ZO
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between
Dibyapratap S/o Birendra Mohanta,Rl/o H. No 6-1 1-9/A, Annapurna Nagar Colony, Badangpet, ^/ohanta, Hyderabad- 500058
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager' Mr' Arjun Myne
...RESpoNDENT/vlrRrrpETrroNER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 2510812021 in W.P.No. 1'l 103 of 2021 on 2710412021.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO: 11104 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne
...PET|T|ONER AND
Naresha, S/_o _ Nagireddy, Aged about 33 years, Rl/o. H.No.1-136, Badanget, Saroornaga(M) Ranga Reddy District
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No. 1 ot 2021, l.A. No. 149 of 2019, l.A. No. 148 ot 2021 and l.A. No.2 ot 2021 in LD. No. 75 o'f 2017 dated 1810212O21 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, olherwise the petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
2t
lA NO: 1 oF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto suspend the operation of the lmpugnedOrderdated 18.02.2021in l.A. No. 'l of 2021,l.A. No. 149 of 2019,1.A.No.148 of 2021 and l.A. No.2 of 2021 in LD. No. 75 of 2017 dated 18.02.2021 on thefile of Hon'ble Labour Cou(-1,Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Pelition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto dispense with the filing of the certifiedcopyand xerox copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023passed in lDNo.75of 2017 on the file of Labour Courf l, at Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleasedto pass orders eschewing the additionalevidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No75 of2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
tA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto extend the order dated 21.12.2023passedin W.P. No. 11104 of 2021 until further orders.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
Naresha, S/o Nagireddy,Ryo. H.No.1-136,Badanget, Saroornagar(M) Ranga Reddy District
...pETrrroNER/REspoNDENT
AND
22
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501 510, Telangana Represented by its General ltlanager, Mr. Arjun Myne
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in W.P.No.1 1104 of 2021 on 2710412021.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO: 11105 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne
...PETITIONER AND
Dileep, S/o Radha Krishnaiah, Aged: about 33 years, Occupation. Specialist, Rl/o. H.No.1-76, Neelam Yadagiri Building, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District, Telangana - 500058
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.O2.2O2O1 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 51 of 2021, l.A. No. 97 of 2021,l.A. No. 96 of 2021 and l.A. No. 52 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 99 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 'l OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supporl of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in LA. No. 51 of
23
2021,1.A. No.97of 2021,1.A. No.96of2021 and l.A.No.52of2021 inl.D.No. 99 of 2018 on the file of Hon'bleLabour Court-1, Hyderabad
IA NO: 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Courtmay be pleasedto pass orders eschewing the additional evidencelet in on 20.11 .2023 on behalfof the Respondent Workman in lD No 99of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
. lA NO: 2OF 2024
Petition under Section1 51 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Courtmaybe pleasedto dispense with the filing of Certified Copyand Xerox Copyof the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 99 of2018on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition,the High Court may be pleasedto extend the order dated 12.01.2024passed in W.P. No. 1 1 105 of 2021 until further orders.
IA NO: 20F 2021
Between:
Dileeo. S/o Radha Krishnaiah, Aqed:about 33 years,Occupation. Specialist,Fl/o. H.No:i-76, Neelam Yadagiri Building,Badangpet Ranga Reddy District,Telangana - 500058
...PETITIONERvRESPONDENT AND
M/s. Tata Advanced SystemsLimited, Sy.No.656,AdityaNagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District- 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager' Mr' Arjun Myne ...RES'.NDENTMR.rpETrroNER
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition,the High Courtmaybe pleasedto
Z4
vacate the order dated: 2710412021 passed in l.A.No. 1 o'f 2021 in W.P.No. '1 1 105 of 2021 in the interests of Justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 11106 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy. No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana. Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne.
...PETTT|ONER AND
Srihari Kandregula S/o. Venkata Ramana, aged about 33years, Rl/o. C.No.:P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP & Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029.
...RES'ONDENT
Pelition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash and set aside the Common orderpassed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in 1.A.No.117 of 2021, and |.A.No.116 of 2021 inlD No.84 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 with regard to receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise,the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, pending disposal of thepresent writpetition, the Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.O2.2O21 in 1.A.No.117 of 2O21 and 1.A.No.116 of 2021 in l.D.No.84 of 2018 on the file of the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: I OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased topass
25
orders eschewingthe additional evidencelet in on 2o11 -2023 on behalfof the RespondentWorkmaninlDNoE4of2OlEonthefileofLabourCourt-|, Hyderabad.
IA NOi 2OF 2024
Petition under section151 CPC prayingthat in the clrcumstances statedin the affidavit filedin supportof the petition, the High court may be pleased to dispense with the filingof certifiedcopy and Xerox copy of the docketorder daled 20.11.2023in l.D. No.84 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad'
IANO:3O F 24
Petition under section151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filedin supportof the petition, the High court may be pleased to extend the order dated12-01-2024 passed in w.P.No.11 106 of 2021 until further orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent:--
WRIT PETITIONNO: 11107 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata AdvancedSystems Limited,Sy.No-.656, ^AdityaNagar,Adibatla ,(V) ibrahimoatnam Mandal,RangaReddy District- 501 510, Telangana Represente6 Dy its General Manager,Mr.Arjun MYne
i AND
Usr,Tl&!:','ifihl;"''"?1,%3j,;llll*&''"xin"3:/"&'ibo"f;loi,'"83[8iHil[ Gopalapuram, Vishakapatnam-S3O027
PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances statedin the affidavitfiledtherewith, the High courtmay be pleased to issue an order, directionmoreparticularlyone in the nature of writ of certiorari and toquash and set asidethe commonorder dated 18.02.2021passed bythe Hon'ble LabourCourt-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No 72of2021 andlA No 73 of 2021 in l.D. No.44 of2O1gwithregardto additional evidence andreceived
26
documents in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
IAN oF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 72 of 2021 and l.A. No. 73 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 44 ol 2O19 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2O23 in I.D. No. 44 ol 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 44 ot 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01.2024 in W.P. No. 11107 of 2021 until further order.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
Naresh Chilakalapalli, s/o ch. Mangayyaa, Fl/o. H.No.58-18-23/3, lndira Priyadarshani Colony Near NAD Road, Butchirajupalem Gopalapuram, Visakhapatnam.
...PETITIONE R/RESPONDENT
27
AND
Mis. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla(V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Rep. by itsGeneral Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1110712021 on 2710412021.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABIO HUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO: 11108 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne
i aro
...PETITIONER
R. Ambareesha, S/o Ramakrishna ppa, aged about 25 years, Occupation Specialist, Rl/o Flat No.'12, Varalaxminagar, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana- 500058
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and toquash and set aside the Common orderpassed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-'l, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 39 of 2021,1.A. No. 109 of 2021, l.A. No. 108 of 2021 and l.A. No. 40 of 2021 in l.D. No. 93 of 2018 dated 1810212021 wilh regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additlonal documents and evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: I OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleasedto
28
suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 inl.A. No. 39 of 2021,1.A. No. 109 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 108 ot 2021 and l.A. No.40 of 2021 in l.D.No. 93 of 2018 daled 18.02.2021 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay bepleasedto dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 2O.11.2023 in l.D. No. 93 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court- l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleasedto pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on20.11.2023 on behalfof the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 93 of 2018 on the file ofLabourCourt - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleasedto extend the order dated 12-01-2024passed in W.P. No.11108 of 2021 until further orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 12142 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aero structures Limited, Sy.No.255,AdityaNagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District- 501510, Telangana Represented by its senior Manager' Mr' Nitin kumar
...pETlroNER
AND
29
Gudu Sahu, S/o Sarat Kumar Sahu, Aged: about34 ears, Occ: Ex.Associate R/o C/o: P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary,INTU AP and Telangana Branch, Ic,v 3-5-1089,3rd floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad- 50002
,..RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 1810212O21passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No.37 of 2021,l.A. No. 111 of 2021,1.A. No. 110 ot 2O21 and l.A. No. 38 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 88 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Pelitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No.37 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 111 of 2021,1.A. No. 110 of 2021 and l.A. No. 38 of 2021 in l.D. No. 88 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: I OF 24
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleasedto dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 88 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court- l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay bepleasedto pass orders eschewing the additional evidence letin on 20.11.2023on behalfof the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 88 of 2018 onthe file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
30
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024passed in W.P. No. 12142 ot 2021 until further orders.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
Gudu Sahu, S/o Sarat Kumar Sahu, Fl/o C/o: P. Damodqr Reddy,Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'ofloor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND i'
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, AdityaNagar, Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, TelanganaRepresented bv its senior Manager' Mr' Nitin kumar
...RESpoNDENT/wRrrpETrroNER
Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleasedto vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214212021 on 0110612021.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO:'12143 OF 2021
Between:
M/s Tata Lockheed Martin Aero structures Limited, Sy No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar
...PETITlONER
AND
J-Anjaneyulu, S/o.Ramachendra Mahadeva, Aged 29years Occ: SpecialistRl/o Flat No.12, Varalaxminagar, Badangpet, Rangareddy District, Telangana
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
3l
pleased to issue an order, direction moreparticularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and toquash andset aside the Commonorder passedby the Honorable Labour Court-1 , Hyderabadin l.A. No. 41 of 2021,1.A. No. 107 of 2021'IA. No. 1OG of 2021 and l.A. No. 42 of 2021in l.D. No. 94 of 2018dated18.02.2021wilh regard to amendment of Claim Statement,receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interestof .iusticeand equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship andloss.
lA NO:'l OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto dispense with the filing of acertified copy of orderin l.A. No. 41 of 2021'l.A.No. 1O7 of 2021,1.A. No. 106 of 2021andl.A. No. 42 of 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2018on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1,Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances statedin -the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of thelmpugnedOrder dated 181O212021passed in l.A.No. '41 ot 2021,1.A. No.107 of2021,1.A.No. 106 of 2021and l.A. No. 42 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2018 on the fileof Hon'ble Labour Court-1,Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto dispense with the filing ofCertifiedCopy and XeroxCopyof the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D.No.94 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filedin supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing theadditional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalfof the
32
Respondent Workman in LD. No. 94 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12143 of 2021 until further order.
lA NO: 3 OF 2021
Between:
J.Anjaneyulu, S/o.Ramachendra lvlahadeva, Aged: 29 years Occ: Specialist, Fl/o. Flat No.12, Varalaxminagar, Badangpet, Rangareddy District.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND i
M/s Tata Lockheed lrr'lartin Aero structures Limited, Sy No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 50'1510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar
r .
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETIT]ONER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances state_d in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 01.06.2021 passed in l.A.No.2 ot 2021 in W.P.No.12143 of 2021 in the interests of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 12144 OF 202'l
Between:
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.2.55, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
...PETITIONER
AND
33
lvlohamad Dastagir, S/o Vaheed MiyanJampad,agpdabout 28 years, R/o C/o P. Damoda!' Reddy, Organizing Secretary,INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5- 1089, 3'd floor, Naray-nguda,Hyderabad - 500029
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction moreparticularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and toquash and set asidethe Commonorderdated18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in l.A. No.115 of2O21, 1.A. No. 33ot2021,1.A. No. 114 ol2O21 andI.A. No.34ol 2021 in l.D. No.85of2018with regard to amendment of Claim Statement,receivingadditional documents and evidence on record in the interest ofjustice andequity, otherwisethe Petitioner will suffergrave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court maybe pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugnedOrder dated 18.02.202'1in l.A. No. 115 of 2021,1.A. No.33of 2021,1.A. No.114ot2021and 1.A.No.34ol2O21 inl.D.No. 85 of 2018 on the file of Hon'bleLabour Court-1, Hyderabad.
IANO:1OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition,the HighCourt maybe pleased to pass orders eschewing the additionalevidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman inlD No 85 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court-l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court maybe pleased to dispense with the filing ofCertifiedCopy and Xerox Copyof the docketorder daled 2O.1'l .2023 in l.D.No. 85 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court- l, Hyderabad.
34
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to extend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in W.P. No. 12144 ot 2021 until further order.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
Mohamad Dastagir, S/o Vaheed Miyan Jampad, Fl/o. C/o. P. Damodar Reddy, organizing s6ii6tirv, iurUc,-Ap 6no reta'ngana Branch, 3-5-1089,3'd floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. i; ...PETITIONEFYRESPONDENT AND t. ir M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.2.55,Adi tya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District-501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
Petition under Section',l51 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214412021on 01lOOl2021.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNABARIA
Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN
WRIT PET!TION NO: 12145 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255,Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District- 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar i
...PETITIONER
AND
Hemant A Paqare, S/o. Ashok Shivram Pagare, Aged 30years, Rl/o. H No.86P Shiva Sainagdr, Badangpet, Saroomagar(M), Ranga Reddy District,Telangana- 500058
...RESPONDENT
35
Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiledtherewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction moreparticularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and toquash andset astde the Common orderdated 18.02.20201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in I.A. No.137 of2021 ,l.A No. 1,5 of 2021,1.A. No. 136 of 2021and l.A. No.16oi 2021ia l.D. No.6 of 2018 with regard to amendment ofClaim Statement,receiving additional documentsand evidence on record in theinterestof justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship andloss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto suspend the operation of the lmpugnedOrder daled 18.02.2021 in l.A.No.137of 2021, l.A. No. 15 of 2021,1.A. No.136 of 2021 and l.A.No.16of 2021 in l.D. No.6 of 2018 on the file of Hon'bleLabour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO:'f OF 2024
, I P"tition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto pass orders eschewing theadditional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalfof the Respondent Workman inl.D.No.06 of 2018on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. I
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto dispense with the filing ofCertified Copyand XeroxCopyof the docket order dated 20.11.2023 inl.D. No.06 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed insupport of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto
36
extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12145 of 2021 until further order.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
Hemant A Pagare, S/o. Ashok Shivram Pagare, R/o. H.No. 86 P Shiva Sainagar, Badangpet, Saroomaga(M), Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
AND
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
...RESPONDENTM'RIT PETITIONER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214512021 on 01.06.2021.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO: 12146 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar i
...PETITIONER
AND
Nagaraju Mahadeva, S/o Mahadeva, aged about 23 years, RYo Samas Street, Bhishmanagar Colony, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal,. H.No.1-103/4, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana
..RESPONDENT
Petition under A(icle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the aFfidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 passed by lhe Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad l.A. No. 1 1 of 2O21,1.A. No. 12
37
of 2021,1.A. No. 140 of 2021 andl.A. No.141 of 2021in l.D. No. 93 of 2017 with regard to amendment of ClaimStatement, receivingadditional documents and evidence on record in the interestof justice and equity, otherwisethe Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: I OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto suspend the operation ofthe lmpugnedOrderdated 1810212021 of in l.A. No.11 of 2021,1.A. No. 12 of 2021,1.A.No. 140 of 2021 and l.A. No.'14'lof 2021 in ID.No. 93 of 2O17 on the file of Hon'bleLabour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: I OF 024
I Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filedin supportof the petition, the HighCourt maybe pleasedto pass orders eschewing the additionalevidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman inlD No 93 ot 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
.. Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court maybe pleased to dispense with the filing ofCertifiedCopy and Xerox Copy of the docketorder daled 20.11.2023 inl.D. No. 93 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court- l, Hyderabad'
IANO 30F 2024
; I e"tition under Section151 CPC praying thatin the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed insupportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto extend the order dated12-01-2024 passedin w.P. No.12146of 2021 until further order.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRISHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent:SRI RAVI CHANDRABEJJARAM
38
WRIT PETITION NO: 12147 OF 2021
Between:
M/s- Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 5015'10, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, lr/r. Nitin Kumar
...PETITIONER :
AND
V. Shashanka, S/o Verrabhadre Gowda S, aged about 30 years, Fl/o C/o. P- DaqoQg,r Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-51089, 3'' floor. Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029
...RES'ONDENT
Petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in :the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court mayl be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 125 ol 2021, l.A. No. 27 of 2021, l.A. No. 124 of 2021 and l.A. No. 28 of 2O21 in l.D. No. 16 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents'and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, to rl suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 125 of 2021,l.A. No. 27 of 2021,l.A. No. 124 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 28 of 2021 in l.D. No. 1 6 of 201 8 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. ] i
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No.'16 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
39
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleasedto pass orders eschewing the additional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalfof the Respondent Workman in l.D.No. 16 of 2018 on the file of LabourCourt - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the HighCourtmaybe pleasedto extend the order dated 12-01-2024passed in W.P. No. 12147 of 2021 until fu(her order.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
V. Shashanka, S/o VerrabhadreGowda S, R/o C/o. P. Damod.arReddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and TelanganaBranch, 3-5-1089, 3'" floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND
M/s. Tata Lockheed MartinAerostructuresLimited, Sy.No.255' Aditya Nagar, Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal,Ranga Reddy District - 501510'Telangana Represenieil by its Senior Manager,Mr. Nitin Kumar
,..RESPONDENTM/RIT PETITIONER
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the HighCourt maybe pleasedto vacate interim orderspassedin W.P.No.1214712021 on O1lOOl2021.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent:Mr. ABID HUSSAIN
-10
WRIT PETITION NO: 12148 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
...PETITIONER
AND
Sangamesh, S/o lvlanohar, Aged about 30 years, R/o C/o. P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3rd floor, Narayanguda' Hyderabad - 500029
...RE''.NDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in lhe affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may, be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 121 of 2021, l.A.,No. 29 of 2021,l.A. No. 120 of 2021 and 1.A. No. 30 of 2021 in l.D. No. 82 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documlnts and evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, ottrerwise f the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1810212021 passed in l.A. No. 121 of 2021,1.A. No. 29 of 2021,1.A. No. 120 of 2021 and l.A. No. 30 oI 2O21 in l.D. No. 82 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 82 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court -t, Hyderabad.
4l
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
;r Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court maybe pleasedto dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.1 1 .2023 in LD. No. 82 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleasedto extend the order dated 12-01-2024passed in W.P. No.12148 of 2021 untilfu(her orders.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
'sangamesh, S/o Manohar, R/o C/o. P. Darlgdar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'" floor, Narayanguda,Hyderabad.
... PETITION ER/RESPONDENT AND
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Rep. byits senior Manager' Mr' Nitin Kumar
...REspoNDENT/wRrr ,ETITT'NER
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay bepleasedto vacate interim orderspassed inW.P.No.1214812O21 on01.06.2021.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNABARIA
Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABIDHUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO: 12149 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd., Sy.No.255,AdityaNa gar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District- 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
..,PETITIONER
AND
Sri Venkatesh Talari, S/o. T. Ramesh, Aged 28years, Ri/o. DamodarReddy, Organising Secretary,H.No. 3-5-1089, 3'" Floor, Narayanguda,Hyderabad- 500029
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Commonorder dated18.O2.2O2O1 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in LA. No.133 of 2021,l.A.No. 19 of 2021 , 1.A. No. 132 of 2021 and l.A. No.20 of2O21 in LD. No. 12 of 2018with regard to amendment of Claim Statement,receivingadditional documentsand evidence on record in the interest ofjustice andequity, otherwisethe Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
IANO:1O 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in thecircumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may be pleasedto suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled18.02.2O21in l.A- No. 133of 2021,1.A. No. 19 of 2021,1-A. No. 132 ot 2021 andl.A. No.20of 2021 in l.D No 12 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleasedto pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on20.11.2023 on behalfof the Respondent Workman in lD No 12 of 2018 on thefile ofLabour Court -l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourtmaybe pleased,to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket older daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 12 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
43
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto extend the order dated 12.01.2024passedin W.P No.12149of 2021 until further orders.
lA NO: 2 OF 202'l
Between:
'Sri VenkateSh Talari, S/o. T. Ramesh, Aged 28years,Ri/o.Damodar Reddy,H.No. 3-5-1089, 3'd Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad- 500029 ii ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
AND
...M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin AerostructuresLimited,Sy.No.255,AdityaNagar, hdibatla(V) lbrahimpatnamMandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510'Telangana Rep. by iti Senior Manager,Mr. Nitin Kumar
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
1r Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleasedto vacate the order dated: 01.06.2021passed in W.P.No.12149oi 2021 in the :nterests of Justice.
Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREENSETHNABARIA
Counsel for the Respondent:SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 12150 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin AerostructuresLimited,Sy.No.255,Adit ya Nagar, Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal,Ranga Reddy District - 501510' Telangana Represenieil by its SeniorManager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
...PETITIONER
AND
Khandappa Kasinath, S/oKasinath, aoed about 27 vea$. Rl/o C/o P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary,INTUC, AF-ino feiangaria Branch,3-5-1089,3'd floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad- 500029
..RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in: the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and sel aside the Common order dated 18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 1 19 of 2021 , l.A. No. 31 ol 2O21 ,l.A No. 118 ot 2021 and I.A No.32of 2021 in l.D. No. 83 of 2018with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, recerving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the operation of the lmpug ned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 1 I 9 of 2021, l.A. No. 31 of 2021, l.A. No. 118 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 32 of 2O21 in l.D. No 83 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of ithe Respondent Workman in l.D.No.83 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court'- l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petilion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.1 1.2023 in l.D. No. 83 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to
45
extend the order dated 12-01-2024passedin W.P. No. 12150of 2021 until further orders.
r Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent:--
.il
WRIT PETITION NO: 12151OF 2021
Between
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin AerostructuresLtd, Sy.No.255,AdityaNa gar, Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented byits Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
...PETITIONER
AND
Ameer Kasheem Bagayat, S/oKasheem Bagayat,Age 2l y.e.ar9,.Occ:Associate, R/o. H. No 13-173l1fokayukta Colony,Badangpet,Ranga Reddy District - 500058
...RESPONDENT
,, r Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the ",I . r'iircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be ,.. l Iliileased to issue an order, direction moreparticularly one in the nature of writof '-tertiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.O2-2O2O1 i:assedby the Hon'bleLabour Court-'1, Hyderabadin l.A. No. 57 of 2021,l.A.No. 58 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 90 ot 2021andI.A. No. 91 ot 2O21 in I.D. No. 102 of 2018 with regard to amendment of ClaimStatement, receivingadditional documentsand evidence on record in the interestof justiceand equity, otherwisethe Petitioner will suffer grave hardship andloss. 't!
lA NO: { OF 2021
I Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court maybe pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugnedOrderdated 18-02.2021in l.A- No. 57 of 2021,1.A. No.58of 2021, l.A.90 of 2021 and l.A. No. 91 of 2021in l.D. No.102 of ,f2018 on the file of Hon'bleLabourCourt-1 ,Hyderabad.
r,)
16
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased topass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of. the Respondent Workman in l.D.No. 1O2 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 102 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court i- l, Hyderabad. 'l.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated_ in t: the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased. to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12151 of 2021 until fur.l ther orders. l a
lA NO: 2 OF 2O2'l
Between:
Ameer Kasheem Bagayat, S/o Kasheem Bhagayat, Rl/o. H.No.13-173/1, Lokayukta Colony, Badangpet ,Ranga Reddy District. l
...PETITION ERYRESPONDENT
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Rep. by its Senior Manager' Mr' Nitin Kumar
...RESpoNDENT/wRrrpET:TroNER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased.lo vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1215112O21 on 01.06.2021
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
I
47
t
.Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO: 12152OF2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin AerostructuresLimited,Sy.No.255,AdityaNagar' Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnamlvlandal,Ranga ReddyDistrict50 1510,Telangana Represented by its SeniorManager, lvlr. NitinKumar
AND
Rames h Naika L N, S/o Naganaika, agedabout 27 yearc,Rl/oC/oP. Damodar Reddv, Organizing'secretaiy, INTUC,-APandTelariganaBranch,3-5-1089, 3rd r-rfloor, Naratanguda, Hyderabad- 500029 ...RESPONDENT
!*iiiii
Petition under Anide 226 of theConstitutionof lndia praying that in the !*iiiii ,.':clrcumstances stated in theaffidavltfiled therewith,the High Court may be ij:leasedto issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writof ,*bertiorariand to quashand set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 {:!l't. ',:"passedbytheHon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabadin l.A. No.127 of 2021,1-4.No. ',7s of zOz't,l.A. No.126 of 2021 andI.A. No.26 of 2o21 in l.D. No. 15 of 2018 with ,.,li"SrrOto amendmentof ClaimStatement, receiving additional documentsand i':rbvidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner
': will suffer grave hardship and loss.
,:llANO: 1 oF 2021
; i Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in ihe affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto 1Is'uspend the operation of the lmpugned Orderdated18.02.2021in l.A. No. 127of tt=iozl, te. No. 25 0f 2021,1.A. No. 126 0l 2021 and l.A. No. 26 0f 2021 in l.D. No. ''.!1's or zo t e on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 ,Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section151CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in ihe affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto pass orders eschewing theadditional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman inlD No 15 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
{ t
48
I
IA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 15 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in W.P. No. 12152 of 2021 until fu er orders. I
I I I
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Between:
Ramesh Naika L N, S/o Naganaika, aged: 27 yearc, Ryo. P. Damodar_- Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP & Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'' Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029
... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
AND
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 5015'10, Telangana Rep by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
.,,RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER
Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated: 01.06.2021 passed in l.A.No. 1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 12152 of 2021 in the interests of Justice
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM
49
WR lT PETITION NO: 12153 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Lockheedl,lartin AerostructuresLtd., Sy.No.255,Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented byits Senior lvlanager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
...'ETITIONER
;i , AND ..1 1
Milind Tidka, S/o. Ashok Shankar Tidka,Age 29 years, Occ. Specialist, Rl/o PlotNo. 86P, Shivsainagar, Badangpet, RangaReddyDistrict - 500058 ..RESPONDENT rt
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the . aircumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Courtmay be . iileased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and toquash and set asidethe Common order dated '18.02.2021passed .by the Hon'ble LabourCourt-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 74 of 2O21 and l.A. No.75 of :.2021 in l.D. No. 33 of 2019 with regard to additional evidence and received ''documentsin the interest of justice and equity,otherwise the Petitionerwill suffer rlt r ,{grave hardship and loss.
xt',
:NO: 1 OF 1
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in :'.the affidavit filed insupPortof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto .-iuspendthe operationof the lmpugned Orderdated 18.02.2021in l.A. No-74 of lrt t rr. :Yd2l ana l.A. No. 75 ot 2O21 in l.D. No. 33 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour
Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
'i rl Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in :l I' the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidencelet in on 20.'11.2023on behalf of the Respondent Workman inl.D.No.33of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, ,HYd erab ad t{,l:I , t'l,'t ,l I l I I I
50
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased , to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 33 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
IA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12153 of 2021 until further order. ' i:
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: -
| WRITPETITIONNO:12154 OF 2021 | .-,ir. 'ri.I! t:/t, ll I |
|---|
Between:
I Aditya Nagar, Adibatla.{V),Adibatla.{V), - 501510, Telangana Represented by501510, Telangana Represented byby I ...PETITIONER AND
M/s. Tata Sikorsky Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla.{V),Adibatla.{V), lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by501510, Telangana Represented byby I its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
Shiva Kumar JK, Sio. Kari Gowda Aged about 32 yea.s, Rl/o. 1 -68, Sri Maha lakshminagar, Badangpet, Saroornaga(M), Ranga Reddy Diskict - 500058.
...RESPONDENT i.
Petition under Anide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18/02/2021passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No. 7 of 2O21 , l.A. No.8 of 2021, l.A. No, 142 of 2021 and l.A. No. 143 of 2021 in l.D. No. 78 of 2017 with regard to ir amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. I
51
t
fA NO:'f OF 2021
lli Petition under Section'1 51 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin ltheaffidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto .,guspendthe operation of the lmpugnedOrder daled 1810212021in l.A. No. 7 of :,2021,1.A.No.8of 2021, LA. No. 142 of 2O21andl.A. No. 143 of 2021 in l.D. No. 78 of 2017 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
;.; Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in l:' l!he.affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto ,jiiispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order
:?.
i:;lANo:2oF2024
.;11
.' {,..r. eetition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in *$he-,affidavitfiled in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto pass ,.!{tl .:l
I tbrders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 2o.11 .2023 on behalf of the .Respondent Workman in l.D. No.78 of2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, a.i,l. 'lHyderabad.'
'.]tt
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
. , Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleasedto ,$xtend the order daled 12-0'l-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12154 ot 2021 until further
...iorder. ittl
itA No; 2 oF 2021 ,1, i lBetween:
,.ShivaKumar JK, S/o. Kari Gowda Aged about 32 years,Rl/o.1-68,Sri Maha :lakshminagar,Badangpet,Saroornagar(M), Ranga Reddy District - 500058.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND
a,i
:,t
&
52
M/s. Tata Sikorsky Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar,Adibatla (V), lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Representedby its senior Manager' It'4r' Nitin Kumar
...RES'.NDENTMR,rpETrroNER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleased to vacate the order dated 01.06.2021 passed in W.P-No. 12154 of2021 in the interests ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 1215s OF 2021 i
Between:
M/s. Tata Lockheed lrtlartin Aero structures Limited, Sy.No.255, AdityaNagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal,Ranga Reddy District- 501510,Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar
...PETITIONER AND
,,,,ii
Rajendra Madhukar Wagh, S/o Madhukar, Aged: about 32years, Occ. Associate Fl./ti. New Synergy Homet6lony, Turkayanjal, RangareddyDidtrict, Telangana i
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that.,in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of wljt, of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common orderpassed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 53 ot 2Q21,l.A. No. 95 of 202'l and LA.,No. 94 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 100 of 2018 daled 181O212021 dated1810212021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving addttional documents and evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer : grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 in LA. No. 53 of
t
53
l,':':
2021,1.A. No. 95 of 2O21 and I.A. No. 94 of 202'l in l.D. No. 100 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
:i: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased topass .orderseschewing the additional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the )rl I,1.$espondent Workmanin lD No 100 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
NO:2 oF 2024
..i;r.r: .Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to '.r.,1'dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order ' dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No.100 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. ,..1 ;
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
,{t,r, Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in 'itthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to . 'tuxtend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12155 of 202'1 until further ,,drders.
*{.
N 2 F 2021
:'1
.{between:
:,
Raiendra Madhukar Wagh, S/o Madhukar, R/o. New SynergyHomeColony, Tuikayanial, Rangareddy District, Telangana ]: ...PETITIoNER/RESPoNDENT AND il .'*: '..M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, RangaReddy District - 5015'10, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr.Nitin kumar
Ii :a rii .l .l :.,*l ,.'t ' .''1\l I I _tl1.! al
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
Petrtion under Section 15'1 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleasedto vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1215512021 on 01 .06.2021 . j .
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI ABID HUSSAIN
WRIT PETITION NO: 12156 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255,Adi tya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga ReddyDistrict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
...PETITIONER
AND
Tippanna Kantli, S/o Rachappa, aged about 31years,Rl/o C/o.P. Damodar Reddy, Oigianizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch,3-5-1089, 3rd floor, Naiayanglda, Hyderabad - 5ooo29 |' ...RESPONDENT l.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in!the I circumstances stated in the affidavit filedtherewith,- theHigh Court maylbe pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common orderdated 18lO2l2O2O1 passed by the Honorable Labour Court-!, Hyderabad in lA. No. 131 of 2O21, l.A. No. 2'1 of 2021, l.A. No.130 of 2021 in l.D. No. 13 ot2018withregardto amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documentsand evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffergrave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedln the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmaybe pleased, to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled181021202'1in LA. No.131of 2021, l.A. No. 21 of 2021, l.A. 130 of 2021 in l.D. No. 13 of 2018 on the file of li Honorable Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
55
..', ,.: !
, lA NO: 1 OF 2024
'l! ;': i Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, the High Court may be pleasedto pass ,,brders eschewingthe additional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalfof the il'"Respondent Workman in lD No 13 ol 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, I t{yderabad.
:IANO:2OF2 024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in ., the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleasedto ilispense with the filing of Ce(ifiedCopy and Xerox Copy of the docketorder daled 2O.11.2023 in l.D.No. 13 of 2018 on thefile of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
NO: 3 OF 24
.l
t:.. Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleasedto nd the order daled 12-01-2O24passed in W.P.No. 12156 of 202'1 until further ,,8ti",.
IA NO: 2 OF 2021
,lriBetw een: ,rl
Tippanna Kantli, Sig Rachappa, aged: 31years, R/o.INTUC, AP & Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089,3'" floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad- 500029
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT iI AND {! 1lM/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255' Aditya Nagar' rAdibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510,Telangana .Represenieilby its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar !
...RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER
a ri r P Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filedin support of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto ivacate theorder dated: 01.06.2021passed in LA.No. 1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 12156 \of 2021 in the interests of Justice.
56
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 12157 OF 2021
Between:
tvl/s. Tata Lockheed l\4artin Aerostructures Ltd, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lr/andal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior lvlanager, Mr. Nitin Kumar r
r ...PETITIONER
AND
I H. Santosha, S/o Hanumanthappa, aged about 35years, Ryo. H.No.6-191, S.L: N.S Colony, Balapur X Road, Saroomagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana tb I
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may, be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 13 of 2021, l.A. No. 14 of 2O21,1.A. No. 138 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 139 of 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2017 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 1 51 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleasedto suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021passed in l.A.No. 119 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 31 of 2021,1.A. No. 118 of 2021 and l.A. No. 32 of 2021in l.D. No. 83 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased o
i I I
57
i
dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 94 of20'17 on thefile of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
':l
p"tition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in . the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased topass r'iriirders eschewing the additionalevidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalfof the ,, ,'il.espondent 'i,Workmanin l.D. No. 94 of 2017 on the file of LabourCourt - l, ! .j.Hyderabad. ll'
{i
'. IA'NO: 3 OF 2024
tl ,:Petition underSection151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in ,-!he affidavit filedin supportof the petition,the High Courtmaybe pleasedto ''':: bxtend the order dated 12.01.2024passedin W.P.No. 12157 of 2021 until further
order
!.t,l
lA NO: 2 OF 202
'Between:
. H.rSantosha, S/o Hanumanthappa, Fyo. H.No.6-191, S.L. N.S. Colony, Balapur X 'Road,SaroomagarMandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. I I ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT L! '}l, AND f:
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin AerostructuresLimited,Sy.No.255,Aditya Nagar, :,.lAdibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 50 1510, Telangana ' 'Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar rr : I ...RESPoNDENT/wRIT PETtTtoNERPETtTtoNER
...RESPoNDENT/wRIT PETtTtoNERPETtTtoNER
,ti:i
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court maybe pleasedto .vacaleinterim orders passed in W.P.No.1214712021on 01 .06.2021.
raCounsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABIDHUSSAIN
,
58
WRIT PETITION NO: 12159 OF 2021
Between:
tvl/s. Tata Lockheed lviartin Aerostructures Ltd., Sy.No.2.55, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represerlted : by'its Senior lt/anager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
: ...PETITIONER
AND
Jikesh Kumar Mohanthy, S/o Gaurang Charm Mohanth y, aged about 26 years, R/o C/o. P. Dangodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary,INTUC, AP and Telangana Bra.1ch, 3-5-1089, 3'' floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad- 500029
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maylbe tr pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and toquash and set aside the Common order dated18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 129 of 2021 , ' l.A. rNo. .li 23 of 2O21,l.A. No. 128 of 2021 and l.A. No. 24 of 2021 in 1.D. No. 14 ot 2018 ,rt,r., with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise lthe I Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. ,l i
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances sta,tld" in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18-02.2021 in l.A. No. 129 of 2021,l.A. No. 23 of 2021, LA. No.'128 of 2021 and l.A. No. 24 of 2021 in l.D: ,No. 14 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. It:ll
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleasef ,to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 2O.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 14 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. j
II
59
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
,ri.
:rl Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin 'the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass : orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the I $espondentWorkman in l.D. No. 14 ol 2018 on the file of LabourCourt - l, ,ii, r.:Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
.-l Petition under Section 15'l CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in :!he :t affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to .iixtend the order daled 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12159 of 2021 until further i:rder.
: ri.Cou nsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA tl
**Cou nsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN 'lli' r'l' WRIT PETITION PETITION NO: 1212 1 60 0F 2021
WRIT PETITION PETITION NO: 1212 1 60 0F 2021
'1'Between:
,l
,:tM/31. tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, AdityaNagar, XAdibatla(V) lbrahimpatnamMandal,Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana '-l::Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar
...'ET.T,ONER
AND
G.M. Chethan, S/o C. Mylarappa, Aged about 24years,Ryo.H.No. l-77,Srilatha ,Building,Badangpet, Saroornagar(M), Ranga Reddy District,Telangana -500058
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the iircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly on in the nature of writ of Certiorari and toquash and set aside the Common orderdated 18.02.2021passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in1-A. No. 5 of 2021, l.A. No. 6 of ...2021, l.A. No. 144 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 145 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 77 of 2O17 with 'ibgardto amendmentof Claim Statement, receiving additional documentsand evidence on record in the interest ofjustice and equity,otherwise the Petitioner .ririll suffer grave hardship and loss.
i ,:
60
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court maybe pleasedto suspend the operation of the impugned Orderdated18.02.2021 passedin l.A. No. 145 ot 2021,1.A. No. 5 of 2021,1.A. No.144 ol2021 and l.A. No'6 of 2021 in .D. No. 77 of 2017 on the file of Hon'ble LabourCourt-1, Hyderabad
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the HlghCourt may be pleased to ASS orders eschewing the additional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf ofthe Respondent Workman in l.D. No.77 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court Hyderabad. ;.tri
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstanc€sstatOdin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court mayU" oru"."f!to dispense with the filing of Certified Copyand Xerox Copy of the docket grder dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No 77 ot 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hrd"ilbfld
lA NO: 3 OF 2024 lll: Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstateldi in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may be pleased i. to extend the order dated 12-01-2024passedin W.P. No. 12160ot 2021 untilfurther order. i i lA NO: 2 OF 2021 i 1,.
Between:
G.M. Chethan, S/o C. Mylarappa, Rl/o.H.No.1-77,Srilatha Building,Badangpet, Saroornagar [,4andal, Ranga ReddyDistrict, Telangana.
6l
,ti ,
M/s. Tata Lockheed [/artin Aeroskuctures Limited, Sy.No.255,Adi tya Nagar, Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal,RangaReddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager,fvlr. NitinKumar
...RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER
' i,i '.. I Petition under Section1 51 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated ln :'a the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may be pleased to .Vacate the interim orders passed in WP No.121601 2021, dt.01.06.2021.
lbou1:,
nsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
;r, rlii , nsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN lr "iou xl WRIT PETITION NO: Ii
WRIT PETITION NO: 14625 OF 2021
: Between:
riirlls. fata Advanced Systems Limited,Sy.No.656,Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga ReddyDistrict - 501 510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne I ...PETrroNER
AND
il.Ramanianeyulu, S/o. B.Raju Agedabout 32 years,R/o H.No. 6-44, Ayodhya 'Nagar, Mberpbt, Saroor Nagar, Hyderabad, 500097
...RESPONDENT
r] Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution oflndiapraying that in the '.tircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 'pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of ,jC<i*iorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 12.04.2021passed :ll Liy the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabadin l.A. No.179 ot 2O21 and l.A. No. 180 Jdt'zozl in l.D. No. 121 of 2018 with regard to additional evidence and received ll1, i ,. ,iddCuments in the interest ofjustice and equity, otherwise the Petitionerwill suffer .'. grave hardship and loss.
1,,,
IANO:
oF 2021
,: Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugnedOrder dated 12.04.2O21in l.A. No. 179of 2021 and l.A. No. 180 of2O21 in l.D. No.12'1 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour
Court-1, Hyderabad.
ti.. il: itittt il
62
j
N i 10F 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may be pleasedto dispense with the filing of Certified Copy andXerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 121 ot 2018on the file of Labour Court '-l, I Hyderabad.
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto SS orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023on behalf ,of ] the r;.1 Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 121 ol2O18 on thefile of LabourCourt] al tit "{ Hyderabad. I iI ,'.:.l lA NO: 3 OF 2024 i i tiitrl
Petition under Section'l 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances sta tn : the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court may be pleas ed rto 'rl extend the order dated 12.01.2024passed in W.P.No. 14625 of 2021 until further order.
Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI B. KRISHNA
Between:
M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerospace SEZ, Plot No 1iD, Sy t',to:'OSO, Aditya Nagar, Aijibatla (v) lbrahimpatnam(lvl) Ranga Reddy District, Telangana- 501510 Represented by its Deputy General lvlanager, Mr. Mandar Ravinder Pha{ke
...PETITIONER
AND S.Srinivasa Rao, S/o. S. Satyam, Aged about 29years, R/o H.No. 6-348, PlotI ifo Old Balaji Nagar, lvleerpet Saroornagar, Hyderabad 500097
...RESPONDENT
:l'
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in:the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maY1 .be { rl
:
--1
63
, pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of .certiorariand to quash and set aside the commonorder dated 12.04.2o21 passed r: by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabadin l.A. No. 187 of 202landl.A' No 188 rl , -!6f zozl in l.D. No. 125 of 2018 with regard to additional evidence and received ..ttocuments in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer it girave hardship and loss.
IA:NO: oF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto f$usnenAthe operationof the lmpugnedOrder daled12.04.2021in l.A. No. 187 of :,"zoz't and l.A. No. 188 ol 2021 in l.D. No. 125 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad
lA NO: 1
': Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in thecircumstances statedin 6..affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleased to dpense with the filing of Certified Copyand Xerox Copy of the docket order ated 20.11.2023 in l.D.No. 125 of 2O18 on the file of Labour Court - I, fderabad.
t
r't NO 2 F 2024
' Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in thecircumstances statedin ihe affidavit filedin support ofthe petition,the High Court may be pleasedto pass 'il ,
.r".&rders eschewing the additional evidence let in on20.11 .2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman inl.D. No. 125 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad
1A NO: 3 OF 2024
il Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances statedin i*[re affiOavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleasedto .lfJxtend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 14627 of 2021 until further Uro.r.
tl t
64
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B. KRISHNA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14629 OF 2021
Between:
M/s. Tata Sikorsky Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya NagaI, Adibatlal(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Peri V Seshagiri Rao S/o. Mr. P V L S Sharma t ...PETITIONER AND I
V. Gangadhar Rao, S/o. Ramakrishna Rao, Aged about 34 years, Rl/o. Huda Colony, Chandanagar, Hyderabad - 500050
...RESPONDENT l"
Petition under Adicle 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that'inf the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may, be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated1210412021 palsed 'll by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 185 of 2021,l.A. No.186 of 2021 ln l.D. No. 124 ot 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statempnt, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest ofjuslice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. i ll
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 12.04.2O21 in l.A. No. 185 of 2021,1.A. No.186 of 2021 in l.D. No.124 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble LaCour i Court - 1, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in I the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the :t Respondent Workman in 1.D.No.124 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court t Hyderabad. {I
t I
i,lf , .:: t:
65
ri lA NO: 2 OF 2024
!i'
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in suppo( of thepetition,the High Court may be pleasedto dispense with the filing of Certified Copyand Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 124 of 2018on the file ofLabour Court - l, Hyderabad.
lA NO: 3 OF 2024 ,:i' Ii+,Petition underSection151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin riihe affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto i$Jri!"0 the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 14629 of 2021 until further riJ.aer
ir. t
i Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
'dt l .i;S,Qounsel for the Respondents: SRI B. KRISHNA 1t''
WRIT PETITION NO: 14630 OF 2021
l_lBetween:
t*l r:
-ll't/d. tata Sikorskv Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga ReddyDistrict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Genirral Manager. Mr. Peri VSeshagiriRao S/o. Mr. P V L S Sharma ...PETITIONER AND
'Rajesh Chaganti, S/o. lssac, Aged about 34 years, Fl/o. 5-1-16/1'01d Meerpet i - Hyderabad 4i ...RESPONDENT
ilf i, Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the ll r. , ,IJircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be Ijt"aseO to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of .iCertiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 121O412021passed lr 'kiy the Hon'ble Labour Court-l, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 177 ol 2021' l.A. No.178 of 2021 in l.D. No.12O of 2018with regard to amendmentof Claim Statement, 'receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice !,
'Cndequity, otherwisethe Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.
;l rl ilti
*+ ll
66
I
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1210412021 in l.A. No. 1 77. of 2021, l.A. No 178 of 2021 in l.D. No.120 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad.
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be to t dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the d ef daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 120 oI 2018 on the file of Labour t, Hyderabad
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased topass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf.offthe Respondent Workman in LD. No. 12O of 2018 on the file of Labour CourtljI, Hyderabad. l
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may Ue Ofeaseflto extend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in W.P. No. 14630 of 2021 until furlher order. ',I'lififi
',I'lififi li l' I i I I T
counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B. KRISHNA
The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER
i"*
THE HONOI'RABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
W.P.Nos. 1O224 102L6 5868 1to92 11093 LLO94 11095. 11096, 11100, 11101, 11103, 111()4, 11105, 11106, tlto7. rI108, 12142, 12143, 12L44, 12145, L2146, L2147, L2L4A L2L49 12150 t2t5t 12152 12153 L2154 12155 12L56, t2 157. 12159, 12160, 14625, 14627, L4629 & L+630 0F 2021
COMMON ORDER:
In these writ petitions, petitioner management is seeking a writ of certiorari, toquash and set aside thecommonorder passed by the Labour Court- 1, Hyderabad dated 18.02.2021 in the interlocutory applications filed in the batchof ID's filedby the workmen of thepetitioner company,such as inI.A.No.18 of 2O21, I.A.No.143 of 2019, I.A.No.7l of 2027 &I.A.No. 150 of 2O2l in I.D.No.73 of 2017, dated 18.02.2021,allowingthe amendment of Claim petition, receipt of additionaldocuments and evidence on record as bad in law,in the interest ofjustice, equality and to pass such otherorder or ordersin the interestof justice.
Similar orders have been challenged in the otherWrit Petitions which are formingpart of this batch.
2
TMD,J W-P.No- 70224 of 2O21 & baach
unauthorizedly absent for a period of ten to srxteen days, the petitioner company has initiated disciplinary proceedings against some of the workmen. Out of 500 employees, who abstained from duties, for the charges of unauthorized absence, some were let off with deduction of 18 days wages, while 100 employees were charge sheeted, while some others were let off with minor punishment of with-holding two annual increments and continuity of service and some others were removed from service. The workmen, who have been removed from service therefore, filed IDs before the Labour Court challenging the removal order and during the pendency of ID, the petitioner in W.P.No.5868 of 2O2l has filed I.A.No. 143 of 2Ol9 to condone the delay and permit certain documents (as per the list enciosed there with) to be brought on record. The said I.A., rvas frled on 15.07.2019 and thereafter, the Labour Court has considered the contentions of both parties about the validity of domestic enquiry and has upheld the validity of domestrc enqurry. It is thereafter that the Tribunal has taken up I.A.No.143 of 2079 and also I.A.No.18 of 2021- which was filed by the respondents workmen to amend the claim petition, I.A.No.71 of 2O2L to adduce additional evidence and I.A.No.15O of 2021 to adduce two more documents.
3
TIVD'J W.P-No. 70224 of 2021 & ba.ch
I (2018)16 scc 299
4
TMD'J W.P.No. 10224 of 2021 & bcach
(lf Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company Vs. Ludh Budh Singhz. for the proposition that it is only where the
2 (19721 r scc s9s
5
TMD,J W.P.No. 10224 oJ 2o2l & bstch
preliminary issue is decided against the management that the employer can be given an opportunity to file additional evidence and also to give similar opportunity to the employee to lead evidence per contra.
(2f The Workmen of M/s.Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company of India (Pvt.,l Limited Vs. The Management & Othersa, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has considered the power of the Tribunal to interfere with its frnding of misconduct recorded in the domestic enquiry unless one or other infirmities as pointed out by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian Iron and Steel Compang Limited, existed and it was held that the earlier the Tribunal had nopower to interfere unless the finding was perverse or thepunishment was so harsh as to lead to be an inference of victimization or unfair labour practice, but after insertion of Section 11(A), theposition is that the employer is entitled to adduce evidence forthe first time before the Tribunal even if he had held no enquiry orthe enquiry held by him is found to be defective. Itis thereafter that an opportunity will have to begiven to theworkman tolead evidence contra. It was further observed that evenafter introduction of Section1 1(A), the employeras well as the
3 (1973) r scc 813
TMD,J w.P.No- 10224 of 2o27 & bdtch
employee can adduce evidence regarding thelegalitvor validity of the domestrc enquiry, if one hadbeen held by an employer. Further in the case of The Workmenof M/s.FirestoneTyre & Rubber Company of India (Pvt.'f Limited(cited supra)t}re Honble Supreme Court has considered the scopeof the Proviso to Section i 1(A) of the Act and has heldthat expression "materials on record", occurring in theproviso,cannot be confined oniy to the materials whichwere availableat the domestic enquiry, but they aiso take in:
(1) the evidence taken by the management at the enquiry and the proceedings of t he enquiry, or
(2) the above evidence and in addition, any further evidence led before the Tribunal, or
(3) evidence placed before the Tribunal for the first time in support of the action taken by an employer as weli asthe evidence adduced by the workmen contra.
It was held that the expression fresh evidencehas tobe read in the context in which it appears namely,as distinguished from the expression materials on record.
TMD,J w.P.No. 10224 of2o21 E bdtch
materials on record before it andwhat thosematerialscomprise of have been mentioned earlierand the Tribunal for the purposes referred to above, cannot call for further orfresh evidence, as an appellate authoritymay normallydo undera particular statute, when considering thecorrectnessor otherwise of an orderpassed by a subordinate bodyand the matter in theproviso refersto the order of discharge or dismissal that is being consideredby the Tribunal.
a (1926) r scc sra
s qzoorl s scc +a:
TMD,J W.P.No. 70224 oJ 2021 a bdtch
TMD,J WP.No. 10224 of2021 & botch
docr.rments Iiled by the workmen were only in relation to the issue of victimization and no new facts have been brought on record and therefore, it is part of material on record. He submitted that the Labour Court has taken intoconsideration the powers of the Tribunal in allowing the material to be brought on record only forprotecting theworkmen from the unfair labour practice adopted by the managementand itwas in these lines that thejudgment of the Hon'bleSupreme Courtin the case of Messrs Bharat Iron Works(cited supra) aldalso in the case of Management of SBI Vs. Industrial Tribunal-lhas been considered. Therefore, according to the learnedcounsel for the workmen, the orders of theLabour Court are justifiedand no interference is called for.
10
TfltD,J W.P.No. 70224 oJ 2O27 & baach
labour practice, but could not file the relevant documents along with the ID. It is subsequent to the filing of the ID ald before hearing of the parties on the validity of the domestic enquiry, that the I.A.No. 143/2021 has been filed to bring the documents on record. The Proviso to Section 11(A) prohibits bringing on record any fresh evidence other than the material on record.
'48-49. We are not inclined. to accept the aboue contention of Mr.Deshmukh. The Prouiso specifies motters uhich the Tribunal shall take into account as also matters tuhich it shall not. The expression 'mateials on record', occurring in the Prouiso, in our opinion, connot be conflned onlA to the mateials uthich Luere auailable at the domestic enquiry. On the other hand, the 'mateials on record' in the Prouiso must be held to refer to mateials on record before the Tibunal. Theg take in-
(1) the euidence taken bg the management cLt the eruryiry and the proceedings of the enquiry, or
(2) the aboue euidence and in ctddition, ang furlher euidence led before the Tnbunal, or
(3) euidence placed before the Tibunal for the first time in support of the action taken by an employer as utell as the euidence adduced bg the uorkmen contra.
The aboue items bg and large should be considered to be the 'mateiab on record' as specified in the Prouiso. We are not inclined to limit thot expression as meaning onlg that mateial thot has been placed in a domestic enqu[ry.
11
TMD,J W.P.No. ,0224 oJ 2o21 A. batch
Tlrc Prouiso only confines the Tibunal to the mateials on record before it os spectfted aboue, uhen consideing the jusfirtcafion or otherluise of the order of discharge or dismissa/. It is only on the basis of these mateials thot the Tibunal is obliged. to consider uhether the misconduct is proued and the Jurther question u.thether the proued misconduct justifies the punishment of dismissal or discharge. It also prohibits the Tibunal from taking ang fresheuidence either forsatisfging itselfregardingthe misconduct or for alteing the puni-shment. From the Prouiso it is not certainlg possible to come to the conclusion that tahen once it is held that an enquiry has not been held or is foundto be dekctiue,dn order reinstatingthe uorkman tt-till haue to be made bg the Tibunol. Nor does it follou-t thot the Prouiso depiues an employer of his ight to adduce euidence for the first time before the TibunaL The expression fresh euidence' has to be read in the context in u.thich it dppears namelg, as distinguished from the expression 'mateials on record'. If so read, the Prouko does not present ang dfficultg at all.
t2
TMI',J W.P.No- 10224 of 2027 & bdtch
Further in the case of Delhi Cloth andGeneral Mills
Company (cited supra), the Delhi High Courthas also observed as under:
(2) xx,xx
(3) xxxx
(4) When a domestic enquiry has been held bg the managenlent and the management relies on the same, it is open to the latter to request the Tibunal to try the ualidity of the domestic enquiry as a preliminary issue and also ask for an oppor1tnitA to adduce euidence before the Tribunal, if the finding on the preliminary issue is against the management. Houeuer elaborate and cumbersomethe procedure mag be, under such circumstances, it is open to the Tibunal to deal, in the first instance, as apreliminary issue the ualidity oJ the domestic enqtiry. If its finding on the preliminary issue is in fauour of the management, then no additional euidence need be cited by the management. Bu[ if the finding on the preliminary issue is ogainst the mdnagement, the Tibunal uill haue to giue the emploger an opportunitg to cite addihonal euidence and alsogiue a similar opportunitg to the employee to lead euidence contra, as the request to adduce euidence Lnd been made bythe management to the Tribunal duing the course of the proceedings ond before the tial has come to an end. When the preliminary issue is decided against th.e management and tLre latter leads euidence before tle Tibunal,th-e position, under such circumstaruces, uill be, tlnt the management is depiued of the benefit of hauing the finding of the domestic Tibunal being accepted as pima facie proof of the alleged misconduct. On the other hond, the management utll haue to proue, by adducingproper euidence, tLnt the taorkman is guiltg of misconduct and that tl9 action taken bg it is proper. It uill not bejust and faireitherto the management or to the uorkmanthot the Tibunal should refuse to toke euidence and thereby osk tlle management to make a further ctpplication, after holding a proper enquiry, and depiue the utorkman ofthe benefit oJ the Tibunal itself being satisfied, on euidence adduced before it, that he LUas or Luas not guiltg of the alleged misconduct.
13
TMD,J W.P-No. 10224 of 2021 &. bdkn
I I
I I
L4
AMD,J W.P-No. 10221 of 2027 d. batch i
'I I by the Labour Court during the subsequcnt procee<lings and hence there is no violation of the principles of Natural Justice and no prejudice, what-so-ever is caused to the maDagement by the above order of the Labour Court.
writ petitions, shall stand closed.
SD/. T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGIS SECTIO OFFICER
i
I {
.lt I
il o;
I
I I
/TTRUE COPY//
'1
I *#
ftJt*. cDcoPies
i
P
!LS
I
i
I fir
I I fii ii tls
68
'; 1
i J t I .t t 1 tII
HIGH COURT
!li-i
rt
rl
I I;
I
i_
ti Hi
II
) fit,
DATED:0310612024
r f EL4
C,
<br>k,
.$ +
C s f.o
,/\C)
s'
,.L
9r/citl*
COMMON ORDER
i $
i
W.P. Nos. 10224, 10216,5868, 11092, 1 1093, 11094,
$
11095, 11096, 11100, 11101, 11103, 11104,11105,
fl,11 106, 11107, 11 108, 12142, 12143, 12144, 12145,
rt,
'l
12146, 12147, 12148, 12149, 12150, 12151, 12152,
i
rlrltl 12153, 12154, 12155, 12156,',12157, 12159, 12160,
',
tl 14625,14627,14629 & 14630 0F 2021
ii E
tf
+
t i*s
t 7:
i.
I
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONSTHE WRIT PETITIONSWRIT PETITIONSPETITIONS
t\21 WITHOUT COSTSCOSTS
I
-l,l
t)rl
;J
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONSTHE WRIT PETITIONSWRIT PETITIONSPETITIONS WITHOUT COSTSCOSTS
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal under Section 11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act is prohibited from entertaining evidence filed by workmen after filing of the Industrial Dispute.
Whether the Proviso to Section 11(A) prohibits the adjudicating authority from taking fresh evidence when the domestic enquiry is found valid.
Whether additional documents filed after the validity of domestic enquiry is upheld constitute fresh evidence prohibited by Section 11(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited & Another Vs. Central Bureau of InvestigationReferred¶988
Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited & Another Vs. Central Bureau of Investigationt
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company Vs. Ludh Budh SinghReferred¶994
(1972) r scc s98 Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company Vs. Ludh Budh Singh · Who else cites this
The Workmen of M/s.Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company of India (Pvt.) Limited Vs. The Management & OthersExplained¶999
The Workmen of M/s.Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company of India (Pvt.,l Limited Vs. The Management & Othersa
Indian Iron and Steel Company LimitedReferred¶999
Indian Iron and Steel Compang Limited
Messrs Bharat Iron Works Vs. Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel & OthersReferred¶1013
Messrs Bharat Iron Works Vs. Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel & Othersa
Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Lakshmidevamma & OthersReferred¶1013
Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs.Lakshmidevamma(SMf) & Anothets
Management of SBI Vs. Industrial Tribunal-1Referred¶1019
Management of SBI Vs. Industrial Tribunal-l
3 provisions across 3 enactments
M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd.
S.Venkatesham
M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited
Shiva Kumar H.T.
M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aero structures Limited
Gudu Sahu
T.MADHAVI DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
