Partly allowed

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited v. Chippakurthi Mallaiah

Telangana HC2 Mar 2026WA/714/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench directed the Company to categorize specific workmen with severe permanent disabilities (e.g., amputation, stroke) under Clause 9.4.0(i) of NCWA-VI for dependent employment, reversing their initial placement under Clause 9.4.0(ii) which wrongly considered disability as general debility.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Employer to categorize five specific workmen under Clause 9.4.0(i) of NCWA-VI. Monetary compensation paid to them shall be adjusted/recovered from post-retirement dues.

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

134881

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶4

MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF^MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

¶6

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF^{JUSTICESRIAPARESHKUMAR SINGH}

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{G.M. MOHIUDOIN}

¶8

gFl 40 7 mFl 12 313 470.175 476.479- 184. EIIFI 1 .492. 495.614. -6213 637 681.686 697.706.709.711.712.713.714^{.715.716.717.728.736.} 737.738-713.756.757. 783.894. 89 . 897- 898.926. .928. 930. {1 3.1164.1{65.1^{167. 1168.1169} 1171- 1172.11 1310. 1311.1 312- 1413.14 1.1415.1448^{rs04 & 1506 ot 2025}

¶9

writ Appeal under clause 15 of the^{Letters Patent preferred against the order} dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.18922^{oI 2023 on the file of the High Court.}

¶10

The Singareni Collieries Company^{Limited,Rep by its Chairmanand} Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan,^{Red Hills, Hyderabad.}

¶11

The Director^(PA and W), The^{SingareniCollieries Company Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶12

The General Manager,^{(Personnel)Welfare and CSR, TheSingareni} Collieries Company Limited^{(SCCL)Welfare Wing,CorporatePersonnel} Department, Singareni Bhavan,^Hyderabad.

¶13

The General Manager, Ramagundam-lll^{Area, The SingareniCollieries} Company Limited^(SCCL), Ramagundam,^{Karimnagar District.}

¶14

AND

¶15

Madurakavi Kistaiah, S/o Venkataiah, aged about 63^{years, Occ. Ex-} Carpenter, EC. No. 1159975, Ramagundam-lll^{Area, Mine, OCPJ,Singareni} Collieries Company Limited^{(SCCL), R/o H. No. T2-1089'Godavarikhani,} Ramagundam Mandal Karimnagar District

¶16

¶17

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

NO:3

¶20

Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.o8.2o24 passed in writ petition. No. 18922 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶21

l.A. NO:4

¶22

Madurakavi Kistaiah, S/o Venkataiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. ExCarpenter, EC. No. 1159975, Ramagundam-lll Area, Mine, OCp-l, Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), R/o H. No. T2-1089, Godavarilhani, Ramagundam Mandal Karimnagar District

¶23

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.i

¶24

AND

¶25

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶26

The Director (PA and w), The Singareni collieries company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudr-.m, Khammam District.

¶27

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate perinnet Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶28

The Genr:ral Manager, Ramagundam-lll Area, The singareni cofiieries Company -imited (SCCL), Ramagundam, Karimnagar Districf.

¶29

The Medic,al Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶30

...RESPONDENTS

¶31

Petition und,gr section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in su'pport of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No.3 ot 2O2S in W.A. No. 39 of 2025, dated 05.03.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶32

¶33

Counsel for the Appellants: SR! E.MADAN^{MOHANRAO, Sr. COUNSEL'REP.} SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SR! S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶34

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI P.S.RAJASEKHAR, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶35

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶36

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^preffered against the Order dated 30/08/2024, in W.P.No.19899 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶37

Between:

¶38

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶39

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company^{Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶40

The General Manager^(Personnel) Welfare and CSR,^The Singareni^Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶41

The General Manager, Ramagundam Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam, Peddapalli District.

¶42

AND

¶43

Konda Ramulu, S/o Narayana, aged about 65^years Occ. Ex-Fitter Helper, CHP GDK.OC.I, Ramagundam-lll, Singareni Collieries^{Company Limited,Rl/o} 11.2.564, Hanuman Nagal 8 lncline Colony, Ramagundam, Karimnagar District.

¶44

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital,^{Repby its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶45

...RESPONDENTS

¶46

Petition under Section 151 CPC prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ^petition. No. 19899 of 2O23,^pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶47

¶48

NO: 4 OF

¶49

Konda Ramulu, S/o Narayana, aged about 65 years Occ. Ex-Fifter Helper, CHp GDK.OC.l, Ramagundam-lll, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rt/o 11.2.564, Hanuman Nagar, 8 lncline Colony, Ramagundam, Karimnagar District.

¶50

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.1

¶51

ENI'

¶52

1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managin,S Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶53

The DireCor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagurlem, Khammam District.

¶54

The Genr:ral Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singarenl Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶55

The General Manager, Ramagundam Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam, Peddapalli District.

¶56

5 The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶57

...RESPONDENTS

¶58

Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No. Z ol 2O2S in W.A. No. 40 of 2025, dated 05i.03.2025, pending disposat of the writ appeal.

¶59

Gounsel for the .Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶60

Counsel for the lilespondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶61

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶62

¶63

WRIT APPEAL O:282 oF,

¶64

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^prefened against the Order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.20554 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶65

Between:

¶66

1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶67

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶68

The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶69

The General Manager, Bhupalapally Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Bhupalapally Area, Bhupalapally District.

¶70

..APPELLANTS

¶71

ENI|.]

¶72

Pendyala Rayamallu, S/o.Poshamallu, aged about 63^years, Occ. Ex-Coal Cutter, E.C.No.2519534, Mine: KTK.S lncline, Bhupalapally Area, Singareni Collieries Company Limited(SCCL), Fl/o H.No.'l-1163, Venkatraopalle, Chityal, Warangal District.

¶73

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana

¶74

...RESPONDENTS

¶75

l.A. NO: 3 OF

¶76

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024^passed passed in WP 20554 ot 2023,^pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶77

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶78

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SR! L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶79

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶80

¶81

WRIT APPEAL NO: 307 OF 2025

¶82

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2Cr24 in writ petition No.19831 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶83

Between:

¶84

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managirg Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶85

The Dire,ctor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagu Jem, Khammam District.

¶86

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collierie:; Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departm,3nt. Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad.

¶87

The General Manager, Bellmapalli Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (liCCL), Bellampalli, Mancherial District,

¶88

ENI'

¶89

Janne Pc,chaiah, S/o. Komuraiah, aged about 63 years, Occ- Ex Electrician E.C.No. 2!.042634, Mine: RKNT lncline Bellampalli Area, Fi/o. 454 Madaram Madram^'l-ownship Thandur mandal Mancheiral District

¶90

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nags Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶91

...RESPONDENTS

¶92

30F20

¶93

Petition umler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstiances stated in the affidavit filed in s;upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024 passed in passed in Writ Petition No.19831 ot 2O23, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶94

Counsel for the ,Appel lants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADoL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶95

Counsel for the llespondent No.'l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶96

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW

¶97

¶98

Writ Appeal under clause^'15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in the W.P.No.19768 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶99

Between:

¶100

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶101

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶102

The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶103

The General Manager, Mandamani Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Bhupalapally, Mancherial District.

¶104

ENIj)

¶105

Mekala Rajeswar Rao, S/o Rajaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex-Coal Cutter, KTK.8 lncline, SCCL, Fl/o H.No.1-100, Chelpur Mandal, Warangal District

¶106

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶107

RESPONDENTS

¶108

l.A. NO: 3OF 2025

¶109

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstiances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in passed in Writ Petition No. 19768 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶110

Counse! for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRIP. llli ,^{sc FoR sccL/} sRt s. UL RE SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶111

Gounsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶112

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶113

¶114

wRttAppeaL' 310 0F 2025

¶115

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the Order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19902 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶116

1 . The Sirrgareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶117

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) KothagurJem, Khammam District.

¶118

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieriesr Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departmr:nt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶119

The General Manager, Bhupalapally Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (liCCL), Bhupalapally Area, Bhupalapally District.

¶120

EIITjl

¶121

1 . Kolkipongu Chinni, S/o Ramulu, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex-General Mazdoor, KTK.6 lncline, Bhupalapalli Area, Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SICCL) R/o Bhupalapalli, Warangal District

¶122

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶123

.RESPONDENTS

¶124

Petition un<ler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavlt filed in srupport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No.19902 ot 2024, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶125

Counsel forthe,Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶126

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶127

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW

WR!T

NO:311 6r'iloai

Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Lefterc Patent^prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.2O3O1 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶132

Between:

¶133

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by'rts Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶134

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶135

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶136

The General Manager, Bellampalli Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Bellampalli Area, Mancherial District.

¶137

ENT'

¶138

Gumasa Shankar, S/o. Posham, aged about 63 years, Occ ExSR Mining Sirdar, E.C.No.2126496, Mine Goleti lA lnline, R/o. D321 Goleti Twonship Goleti Adilabad District

¶139

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana

¶140

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024^passed in Writ^petition No 20307 ot 2023,^pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶141

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REODY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶142

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶143

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW

¶144

¶145

AFpeAt- NO:^gr2 or zozs

¶146

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30.08.2024 in Writ Petition No.20626 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶147

Between:

¶148

The Sirrgareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶149

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagutlem, Khammam District.

¶150

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Companlr Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶151

The General Manager, Bellampally Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (tiCCL), Bellampally Area, Mancherial District.

¶152

AND

¶153

lmmidichefty Chandraiah, S/o. Kistaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex General lVlazdoor, E.C.No. 2078106, Mine: Goleti lA lncline Bellampally Area, R/o.^'160 tGthapally Thandur Mancherial District.

¶154

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶155

...RESPONDENTS

¶156

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in s.upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20626 of 2O23, pending disposal of the wit appeal.

¶157

Counsel forthe,Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDOY, SPL. GP, attached to the ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶158

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶159

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶160

¶161

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the Order Dated 30/08/2024, in W.P.No.19361 ol 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶162

Between:

¶163

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶164

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶165

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶166

The General Manager, Ramagundam-l Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam, Karimnagar District.

¶167

tlNt

¶168

Yasam Shenkaraiah, S/o Parvathalu, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-General Mazdoor EC No. 1176378, GDK.11 lncline, Ramagundam-l Area, Singareni Collieries Company Limited(SCCL) R/o H.No.9-7-3, Vittal Nagar, Godavarikhani Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District.

¶169

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep. by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶170

fd{{{.IIttI{r[S

¶171

l.A. NO:3OF2025

¶172

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2023 passed in^passed in WP 19361 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶173

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶174

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶175

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶176

¶177

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.2O221 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶178

1 . The Sirrgareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶179

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) KothagurJem, Khammam District.

¶180

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Compan'7 Limited (SCCL) Wetfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶181

The Gerreral Manager, Ramagundam Area-|, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District.

¶182

.APPELLANTS

¶183

AND

¶184

Kalavala Lachaiah, S/o. IGlvala Ramaiah, aged about 67 years, Occ. Ex.MV Driver, E.C.No. 2202878, Mine: GDK-I CSP, RG-|, Ri/o. Ramagundam, Peddapalli District.

¶185

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶186

...RESPONDENTS

¶187

o oF 2025

¶188

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in s;upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20221 ot 2023, pending disposal of the wdt appeal.

¶189

Counsel for the ,Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. GOUNSEL, REP. P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶190

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶191

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR irlEDlCAL HEALTH & FW

¶192

¶193

"NO= 47O

¶194

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred against the order dated 30/08/2024, in W.P.No.2O428 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Court.

¶195

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶196

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶197

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶198

The General Manager, Ramagundam Area-|, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District.

¶199

Doddilla Madanaiah, S/o Doddilla Yadaiah, Aged about 65^years, Occ. ExGeneral Mazdoor, E.C.No.929482, Mine: GDK 2 and 2A lncline, RGl,^Fl/o. H.No.1 4352, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam, Peddapalli District.

¶200

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶201

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^may be^{pleased to suspend} the order dated 30/08/2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 20428 ot^{2023, pending} disposal of the writ appeal.

¶202

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REODY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. AODL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶203

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶204

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶205

¶206

WRIT APPEAL | 4750F 2025

¶207

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the Order dated 30-08-2(t24 in W.P.No.2O777 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶208

Between:

¶209

'1 . The Sirrgareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶210

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) KothagurJem, Khammam District.

¶211

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries, Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departmr:nt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶212

The Gerreral Manager, Ramagundam Area-|, The Singareni Collieries Companl, Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District.

¶213

..APPELLANTS

¶214

AND

¶215

Dongala Mallaiah, S/o. Dongala Lingaiah, aged about 69 years, Occ. ExSupport t\Ian, E.C.No. 1194909, Mine: GDK-S lncline, RG-|, R/o. H.No.210, Laxmipuram, Ramagundam, Peddapalli District.

¶216

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarac, Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶217

...RESPONDENTS

¶218

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶219

Petition uncrer Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20777 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶220

Counsel for the Appellants: SR! E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL RED SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶221

Counsel for the Flespondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶222

Counsel for the Flespondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶223

¶224

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^prefened against the Order Dated 3OlOBl2O24 in W.P.No.1974O of 2O23 on the file of the High Court.

¶225

Between

¶226

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶227

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶228

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

¶229

The General Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District

¶230

.APPELLANTS

¶231

AND

¶232

G. l(anakaiah, S/o.Ramaiah aged about 63^years, Occ Ex-Motor Mechanic E.C.No. 2264854 Mine: Area Workshop, Mandamarri Area, H.No. Q.No. D- 496, l-Zone, Mancherial District.

¶233

The Medicat Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶234

RESPONDENTS

¶235

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶236

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to^suspend the order dated 3O.O8.2fl24 passed in Writ Petition No. 19740 of 2O23,^pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶237

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, aftached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶238

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶239

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶240

¶241

itrlrlll PEAL NO:479 OF 2025

¶242

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preffered against the Order dated 30/08/2C,24 in W.P.No.2O278 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶243

Between

¶244

1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶245

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagu,lem, Khammam District.

¶246

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries; Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departm,:nt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

¶247

The General Manager, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam-3 Area, Peddapalli District.

¶248

.APPELLANTS

¶249

AND

¶250

G Sadashivam, S/o. Rajaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex-EP Electrician, E.C.No.862915 Mine: GDK OC-|, Ramagundam-3 Area, Rl/o. H.No.T2-194, Thi!ak Na,3ar, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District.

¶251

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana

¶252

...RESPONDENTS

¶253

t.A-

¶254

Petition uncler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstiances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ. Petition No. 20278 ot 2O23, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶255

Counsel for the r{ppellants: SRI E MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶256

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶257

Counsel for the Flespondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶258

¶259

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters Patent^prefened against the Order dated 30-08-2024, in WP.No.19660 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶260

Between

¶261

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited., Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶262

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶263

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶264

The General Manager, Bhupalapally Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Bhupalapally Area, Bhupalapally District.

¶265

...APPELLANTS

¶266

AND

¶267

Mamidi Rajaiah, S/o. Komuraiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. ExCoal Filler, E.C.No.1199250, Mine: VKP GDK9 lncline Ramagundam ll Area, R/o. 11521A 30 ward Kalvasrirampur Srirampur Mandal Manchierial District.

¶268

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶269

...RESPONDENTS

¶270

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶271

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 3O.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 19660 of 2023,^pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶272

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶273

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶274

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶275

¶276

APPEAL NO:488 OF 2025

¶277

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the order dated 30/08/2Cr24 in WP.No.3O622 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶278

Between:

¶279

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managirg Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶280

The Dire,ctor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagu,Jem, Khammam District.

¶281

The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collierie:; Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departm,3nt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

¶282

The Gereral Manager, Ramagundam Area{, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District.

¶283

't. Ponnam Rayamallu, S/o.Ponnam Ramaswamy, aged about 65 years, Occ. Valve Operator, E.C.No. 870798, Mine: Civil, RG-|, R/o. H.No.15-1-188, Tilak Nagar, Ramagundam , Peddapalli District.

¶284

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶285

...RESPONDENTS

¶286

l.A. NO: 3OF 2025

¶287

Petition uncler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 30622 of 2023,^pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶288

Gounsel for the r\ppellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL,^REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶289

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. GOUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶290

Counsel for the Flespondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH &^FW

¶291

¶292

W r{rT ap P E A r- " N 6ff{6UffE.,H2tr2s

¶293

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefterc Patent preferred against the order dated 3010812024 in the W.P.No.19798 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶294

Between:

¶295

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶296

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶297

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfarc and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶298

The General Manager, Ramagundam Area-|, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District.

¶299

...APPELLANTS

¶300

AND

¶301

Namasani Narsaiah, S/o.Namsani Ramaiah, aged about 69 yearc, Occ.ExGen. Maz., E.C.No. 1191969, Mine: GDK 2 and 2A lncline, RG-|, R/o. Santhosh Nagar, GV-8 lncline, Karimnagar District.

¶302

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶303

.RESPONDENTS

¶304

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶305

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition. No. 19798 of 2O23, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶306

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶307

counsel for the Respondent No.1: sRl L.RAVICHANDER, sr. couNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶308

¶309

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶310

WRITAP NO:490 OF 2025

¶311

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30-08-2C24 in W.P.No.19642 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶312

Between:

¶313

1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶314

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶315

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singaren i Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶316

The General Manager, Ramagundam Area-|, The Singareni Collieries Company' Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Karimnagar District.

¶317

Paranandi Ramaiah, S/o. Paranandi Durgaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. ExHaulage tJperator, E.C.No. 922472, Mine: GDK 2 & 2A lncline, RG-|, Fl/o. H.No.8-1-278, Hanuman Nagar, Ramagundam, Karimnagar District.

¶318

The Medi,:al Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarac, Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶319

PONDENTS

¶320

Petition uncler Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 19642 of^2023,pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶321

Gounsel for the r\ppellants: SRI E.MADAN^{MOHAN RAO,Sr. COUNSEL, REP.} SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶322

Gounsel for the flespondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER,^{Sr. COUNSEL, REP.} SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶323

Counsel for the Flespondent No.2: GP^{FOR MEDICALHEALTH & FW}

¶324

¶325

Wnrr AppEAt:491OF 2O25

¶326

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.2O441 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶327

Between:

¶328

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶329

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District,

¶330

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶331

The General Manager, Ramagundam Area{, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District.

¶332

ENT,]

¶333

Atla Mallaiah, S/o. Atla Lingaiah, aged about 63^years, Occ- Ex- General Manager, E.C.No. 930302, Mine - GDK-S lncline, RG-|, Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) R/o. H.No.9-7-442, Viltal nagar, Godavarikhani, Peddapalli District.

¶334

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶335

...RESPONDENTS

¶336

l.A. NO: 3 OF

¶337

Petition under Section 151 CPC^prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^{pleased to suspend} the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 20441 of 2023,^pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶338

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SLI*IilllllliFIIA sc FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶339

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶340

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶341

¶342

492

¶343

Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Lefters Patent preferred against the order dated 30.08.2024 in Writ Petition No.20197 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶344

Between

¶345

The Sirrgareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶346

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶347

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Companv Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶348

The General Manager, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam-3 Area Area, Peddapalli District

¶349

Gandu Prrshamallu, S/o. Narsaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-General Mazdoor, E.C.No.939974, Mine: GDK OC-|, Ramagundam-3 Area, Ri/o. H.No.10-2'.-17 4ll, Erlapalle, Kamanpur Mandat, Peddapalti District

¶350

The Medi,:al Board of Gandhi Medical Hospitat, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarac, Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana

¶351

...RESPONDENTS

¶352

¶353

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20197 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶354

Gounsel for the l\ppellants: SRI E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL ' SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶355

Counsel forthe Flespondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶356

Gounsel for the Flespondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶357

¶358

oF 2025

¶359

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.1 9652 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶360

Between:

¶361

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶362

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶363

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

¶364

The General Manager, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL), Ramagundam-3 Area, Peddapalli District

¶365

Vemulawada Laxman, S/o. Nagaiah, aged about 63^years, Occ^Ex-EP Operator, E.C.No1426429, Mine GDK OC I Ramagundam-3^{Area, R/o.} H.No. 1 9-3-5/1, Marandeya Colony, Ramagundam Madal, Peddapalli^District.

¶366

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶367

.RESPONDENTS

¶368

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated^{in the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleasedto suspend} the order dated 30.08.2024^{passed in Writ. Petition No. 19652 oi 2O23, pending} disposal of the writ appeal.

¶369

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. OOUNSEL, REP. SR! P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FORSCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADOL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶370

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶371

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

WRITAPPEAL

O:,614 OF 2025

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent appeal preferred against the order date<l3OlOBl2O24 in W.P.No.20228 of 2023 on the fite of the High Court.

¶376

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶377

The Dire,ctor, (PA and W) The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagiklem, Khammam District.

¶378

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Departm,3nt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶379

The General Manager, Mandamani, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (ISCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

¶380

AND

¶381

Sri Devasani Sailu, S/o. Venkataiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex-pump Operator, E.C.No.02250693, Mine: KKS lncline MM Area, R/o. H.No. 7-26i, 3rd Zone, Mancherial District.

¶382

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

..RESPONDENTS

t.A. NO:

Counsel forthe,Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REOOY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶387

Counsel for the ll.espondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶388

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶389

¶390

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in the W.P.No.19174 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Court.

¶391

Between:

¶392

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶393

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶394

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad.

¶395

The General Manager, SRP, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶396

...APPELLANTS

¶397

Kanthala Mohan Reddy, S/o. Muthi Reddy, aged about 63years, Occ.^Ex- Trammer, E.C.No. 2622604 , Mine: RK6 lncline, Srirampur Area, KD156, Krishna colony, Srirampur Mancherial District.

¶398

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶399

l.A. NO: 3OF 2025

¶400

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated^{in the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^{pleased to suspend} the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ^{PetitionNo. 19174 of 2023,pending} disposal of the writ appeal.

¶401

Counsel for the Appellants: SR! E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. OOUNSEL'^REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL ' SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶402

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶403

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶404

¶405

WRIT APPEAL O: 621,OF

¶406

Writ Appreal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the Order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.20680 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶407

Between:

¶408

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managin,3 Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶409

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagu<lem, Khammam District.

¶410

The Gen,:ral Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Companl, Limited, (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singaren Bhavan Hyderabad.

¶411

The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (tiCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶412

...APPELLANTS

¶413

AND

¶414

1 . Byram Mallaiah, S/o. Venkaty, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. :2865587 Mine: RKNT lncline Srirampur Area, Fi/o. Mancherial District.

¶415

The Medi:al Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmaracr Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶416

...RESPONDENTS

¶417

F 202s

¶418

Petition unrler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in s.upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20680 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶419

Counsel for the dppellants: sRl E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. sRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / sRl S.RAHUL REDOY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶420

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶421

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶422

¶423

¶424

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^prefened against the^order dated 30/08/2024 in WP.No.2O652 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶425

1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, SingareniBhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶426

The Director^(PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Kothagudem, Kharnmam District.

¶427

The General Manager^(Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare Wing, C,orporate Personnel Department, SingareniBhavan Hyderabad,

¶428

The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Mancherial District.

¶429

ANIj]

¶430

'1. Pittala Rajaiah, S/o.Mallaiah, aged about 67 years, Occ. Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. 2759312, Mine: RK-Tlncline Srirampur^{Area, FUo. H.No. 'l-90,} Laxmipur, Mankondur, Laxmipur, Karimnagar District.

¶431

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital,^Rep by its^{Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶432

¶433

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstrances stated^{in the} affldavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleased to suspend} the order dated 3O/08/2024^passed in Writ^{Petition No. 20652 ot 2023,pending} disposal of the writ appeal.

¶434

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL'^REP' SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶435

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶436

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW

AL NO:

2025

Writ Aplreal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred Against the Order datd 24-09-2()24 in WP.No.3693 ot 2024 on the file of the High Court.

¶441

Between:

¶442

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶443

The Direrctor (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagu,Jem, Khammam District.

¶444

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate^personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad.

¶445

The Ger,eral Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (ISCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶446

..APPELLANTS

¶447

Sadala Pentaiah, S/o. Lachaiah, EC No.2541727, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-General Mazdoor, SRP Area, Mine.RK-S, Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), tUo. KD522, Krishna Colony, Mancherial Srirampur Colony, Aditabad Flictriar

¶448

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶449

RESPONDENTS

¶450

NO: 3 OF 20

¶451

Petition uncler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petltion, the High Court may be pteased to suspend the order dated 24.09.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 3693 of 2024. pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶452

Counsel for the r{ppellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶453

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRICH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶454

Counsel for the Flespondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶455

¶456

Writ Appeal under clause^'15 of the Letters Patent prefeffed against the oder dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.2O511 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶457

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶458

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶459

The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶460

The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶461

ENI'

¶462

Late Sri Boina lGnakaiah, S/o. Komaraiah, Occ. Ex- Supportman, E.C.No. 2803080, Mine: RK-7 lncline Srirampur Area, Fl/o. H.No.7-130, ASPR Nagar, Teengalpahad, Srirampur, Mancherial District.

¶463

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶464

RESPONDENTS

¶465

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No.20511 of 2023,^pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶466

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRIP,SRI HARSHA REODY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDOY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶467

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶468

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶469

¶470

NO:641 OF 2025

¶471

Writ Aplreal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against order dated 30/08/2024 in WP.No.19411 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶472

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶473

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶474

The Gen,:ral Manager (Perconnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singaren'Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶475

The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Mancherial District.

¶476

AND

¶477

Mogili Rajamallu, S/o.lylaiah, aged about 67 years, Occ. Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. 2850053 Mine RK-7 lncline Srirampur Area, R/o. D-1812, Shirkey, Mancheri:rl District.

¶478

The Medir:al Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, rep. by its Superintencjent, Padmarao Nagar, Secundrabad, Telangana.

¶479

...RESPONDENTS

¶480

l.A. NO: 3 OF 202s

¶481

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 19411 ot 2023,^pending disposal of the wr t appeal.

¶482

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E. IIIOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S. LRE SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶483

Counsel for the Flespondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶484

Counsel for the R.espondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶485

¶486

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.2O341 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶487

Between:

¶488

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶489

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶490

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶491

The General Manager, Mandamani, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Adilabad District

¶492

APPELLANTS

¶493

AND

¶494

Suramalla Ratnaiah, S/o. Dhataiah, aged about 63^years, Occ. ExSupportman, E.C.No. 2624842, Mine . KK-1 lncline , R/o. H.No. 13-440, Shanthi Nagar, Kythanpalli, Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

¶495

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶496

...RESPONDENTS

¶497

Petition under Section 15'l CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 20341 ot 2O23,^pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶498

Counsel for the Appellants: E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / s.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶499

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL,^REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶500

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW

¶501

¶502

PEAL NO: 646 OF 2025

¶503

Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in WP.No.19755 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶504

Between:

¶505

1 . The Sirrgareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶506

The Direrctor (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagurlem, Khammam District.

¶507

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieriesr Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departm,:nt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad.

¶508

The General Manager, SRP, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), :Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶509

Sri Thotler Jayanna, S/o. Mallaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ.Ex4oal Cutter, 8.C.No.2ti25563, Mine: Rk-6 lncline SrirampurArea, Fi/o. H.No.1-3, Narsapur Colony, D,andepalli, Adilabad District.

¶510

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, rep. by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶511

...RESPONDENTS

¶512

30F 202s

¶513

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in :;upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19755 ol 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶514

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / s S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶515

Counsel for the llespondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. GOUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶516

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶517

¶518

rill

¶519

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^preferred against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No. 20443 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Court.

¶520

Between:

¶521

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶522

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶523

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶524

The General Manager, SRP, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶525

ENIj]

¶526

Sri. Nannavena Saraiah, S/o. Kanakaiah, aged about 63^years, Occ- ExGeneral Mazdoor, E.C.No. 2fi2550, Mine: Rk€ lncline Srirampur Area, Rl/o. 1 0-73, Kythanpally, Ramakrishnapur, Mancherial District.

¶527

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶528

.RESPONDENTS

¶529

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶530

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 20443 of 2023,^pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶531

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REOOY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶532

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. Sl iIfeIIEIIImflIrlt'InN

¶533

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶534

¶535

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in the W.P.No.20206 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶536

1 . The Sir,gareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶537

The Director (PA & W). The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶538

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Companlr Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶539

The General Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited ({iCCL), Mandamarri Area, Adilabad District.

¶540

E[IT'

¶541

Embadi Lingaiah, S/o. Balaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ Ex- Trammer, E. C. No. 2081426, Mine: KK- 1 lncline , R/o. Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

¶542

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶543

RESPONDENTS

¶544

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the afiidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20206 of 2022, pending disposal of the wit appeal.

¶545

Counsel forthe,Appellants: SR! E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SR! HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶546

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶547

Counsel for the Flespondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶548

¶549

6iiii

¶550

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in WP.No.19882 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶551

Between:

¶552

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶553

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶554

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad.

¶555

The General Manager, Mandamarri Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

¶556

..APPELLANTS

¶557

AND

¶558

Chekka Lingaiah, S/o Rajaiah Occ. Ex-General Mazddor, Mandamani Area, E.C.No.2296217, Mine: Shanthikhani Rio. H.No. 32-50, Mandamarri, District.Mancherial.

¶559

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶560

..RESPONDENTS

¶561

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the afiidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 19882 ot 2O23,^pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶562

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. n NSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC sccL / SRI S.RAHUL RED SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶563

Gounsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶564

Gounsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶565

¶566

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against the Order Dated 30/08/2024 in Writ Petition No.20866 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶567

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managirg Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

¶568

The Direrctor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) KothaguCem, Khammam District.

¶569

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collierie:; Company. Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶570

The General Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (ISCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

¶571

1 . Maraboina Komuraiah, S/o. Balaraju, aged about 63 years, Occ- ExSupportnran, E.C.No. 228O7O3, Mine: KK-1 lncline, Mandamani Area, R/o.Mandamani Mandal, Mancherial District.

¶572

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medicai Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana

¶573

..RESPONDENTS

¶574

oF 2025

¶575

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in srupport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the oder dated 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20866 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶576

Counsel for the ,Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SR! S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, aftached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶577

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶578

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶579

¶580

WRITAPPEAL Eta

¶581

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P No.20235 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶582

Between:

¶583

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶584

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶585

The General Manager,^(Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶586

The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶587

1 . Kummari Kistaiah, S/o.Ankulu, Aged about 63^years, Occ. Ex-Electrician Helper, E.C.No.2781872, Mine: RK-S lncline, SrirampurArea, R/o. H.No. 19218, Ramnagar, Mancherial District.

¶588

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶589

KT+T{oIttrilfE

¶590

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 20235 of 2023,^pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶591

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL'^REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REODY, SG FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. AOVOCATE GENERAL

¶592

for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶593

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶594

¶595

WRIIAPPEAL. i 672

¶596

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19639 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶597

Between:

¶598

The Sirrgareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶599

The Direrctor (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) KothagurJem, Khammam District.

¶600

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Compan,T Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶601

The General Manager, Mandamani Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (liCCL), Mandamani Area, Adilabad District.

¶602

EIIT'

¶603

Rontala Gangaram, S/o. Komaraiah, aged about 63 years, Occ- Ex- Lamp Room Attendant, E.C.No. 2203183, Mine: Kasipet-1 lncline, Mandamani Area, Rio H.No.7S-SRT, Bellampalli, Mancherial District.

¶604

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospitai, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶605

...RESPONDENTS

¶606

¶607

Counsel forthe,Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL ' SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶608

Counsel forthe Respondent No.I: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶609

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶610

¶611

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against^{the Order} Dated 3048-2024 in W.P.No.19783 ot 2023 on the^{file of the High Court.}

¶612

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited,^{Rep by its Chairmanand} Managing Director, SingareniBhavan^{Red Hills Hyderabad.}

¶613

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni^{Collieries Company Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶614

The General Manager^{(Personnel)Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare^{Wing, Corporate PersonnelDepartment,} SingareniBhavan Hyderabad,

¶615

The General Manager, Srirampur Area,^{The Singareni Collieries Company} Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial^District.

¶616

EtrE

¶617

Ch Rajaiah, S/o. Bheemaiah, aged^{about 65 years, Occ. Ex- Timberman,} E.C.No.2754590, Mine. RK-7 lncline Srirampur^{Area, Fl/o.H.No.2-3l5'} Venkatapur, Mandamani^(M), Mancherial^District.

¶618

T|r- Medical Board of Gandhi^{MedicalHospital, Repby its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad,^Telangana.

¶619

...RESPONDENTS

¶620

Petition under Section^'151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the} affrdavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleasedto suspend} the order dated 30.08.2024^{passed in Writ Petition No. 19783ot 2023, pending} disposal of the writ appeal.

¶621

Gounsel forthe Appellants: SRI^{E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO,Sr. @UNSEL, REP.} SRI P.SRI HARSHA SC FOR SCCL ' SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached^{to the} O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶622

Counsel forthe Respondent^{No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANOER'Sr. COUNSEL'REP.} SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶623

Counset forthe Respondent No.2:^{GP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW}

¶624

¶625

WRIT APPEAL 676 2025

¶626

Writ Apgreal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30-08-2024 in W.P.No.19897 of 2O23 on the file of the High Court.

¶627

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶628

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶629

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Companv Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶630

The General Manager, SRP, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), tSrirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶631

.APPELLANTS

¶632

AND

¶633

Sri Chint;akindi Sheshagiri, S/o. aged about 63years, Occ. Head Overman, E.C.No. :2624842, Mine. RK6 lncline, Srirampur Area, R/o. 13-440, Shanti Nagar, K1{hampalli, Srirampur, Mancherial District.

¶634

The Medical Boad of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarar: Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶635

...RESPONDENTS

¶636

l.A. NO: 3OF 2(t25

¶637

Petition un,ler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in :;upport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ^petition No. 19897 of 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶638

Counsel forthe AppellanG: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, artached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶639

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRt L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶640

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: Gp FOR MEDTCAL HEALTH & FW

¶641

¶642

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^prefened against the^order dt.3OlOBl2O24 in the W.P.No.2O513 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Court.

¶643

Between:

¶644

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶645

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company^{Limited(SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶646

The General Manager^(Personnel) Welfare and CSR,^{The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate^{PersonnelDepartment,} Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶647

The General Manager, Srirampur Area,^{The Singareni Collieries Company} Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Mancherial District.

¶648

¶649

Palle Rajaiah, S/o. Butchaiah, aged about 63^{years,Occ Ex- General} Mazdoor, E. C. No. 2824303, Mine: RK- 8 lncline Srirampur^{Area, (Singareni} Colleries Company Limited^(SCCL) FJo.^{D- 1176, Godavari Colony,Naspur,} Mancherial District.

¶650

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital,^{Rep by its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶651

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstiances stated in the} afflrdavit filed in support of the^petition, the High^{Court may be pleased to suspend} the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ^{Petition No. 20513 ot 2023,pending} disposal of the writ appeal.

¶652

lforthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN^{RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP.} SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached^to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶653

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI^{L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL'REP.} SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶654

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP^{FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW}

¶655

¶656

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30/08/20124 in W.P.No.19645 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶657

Between:

¶658

The Sin,Jareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, SingareniBhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶659

The Dire:tor (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothaguclem, Khammam District.

¶660

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, SingareniBhavan Hyderabad,

¶661

The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (S}CCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶662

...APPELLANTS

¶663

AND

¶664

Gofte Raj;riah, S/o.Mallaiah, aged about 64 years, Occ- Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. 2842636, Mine: RKNT lncline, SrirampurArea, Rl/o. Mancherial District.

¶665

The Medi,;al Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarac, Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶666

...RESPONOENTS

¶667

l.A. 25

¶668

Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19645 ot 2O23, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶669

l.A. NO: 4OF 20i25

¶670

Gotte Rajaiah, S/o.Mallaiah, aged about 64 years, Occ- Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. 2842636, l\iline: RKNT I ncline, Srirampur Area, Rl/o. Mancherial District.

¶671

.PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No. I

¶672

AND

¶673

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing [)irector, SingareniBhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶674

¶675

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶676

The General Manager^(Personnel) Welfare and CSR,^{The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, SingareniBhavan Hyderabad,

¶677

The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni^{Collieries Company} Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶678

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital,^{Repby its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary)

¶679

...RESPONDENTS

¶680

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying thatⁱⁿ the^{circumstances statedin the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{maybe pleased to vacate the} interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made^{in l.A.No.3 of 2025 in W.A. No. 686} ot 2025, dated 08.07.2025,^pending disposal^{of the writ appeal.}

¶681

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MAOAN^{MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL'REP.} SR! P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL^/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached^{to the} O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶682

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER,^{Sr. COUNSEL, REP.} SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶683

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP^{FOR MEDICALHEALTH& FW}

¶684

wRtr AFFE"ffi fr-iffi6ffiiF,2025

¶685

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters^{Patent Preferred Against the Oder} Dated 3068/2024, in W.P.No.2O4N ot 2025 on^{the file of the High Court.}

¶686

Between:

¶687

The Singareni Collieries Company^{Limited,Rep. by its Chairman and} Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan,^{Red Hills, Hyderabad.}

¶688

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni^{Collieries Company Limited(SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶689

The General Manager^{(Personnel)Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare^{Wing,Corporate PersonnelDepartment'} Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶690

The General Manager, Srirampur Area,^{The Singareni CollieriesCompany} Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Mancherial^District.

,..APPELLANTS

AND

Late Suramalla Chinnaiah, S/o. Posham, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex- Coal Cutter, E.C.No. 2778895, Mine, RK-7 lncline Srirampur Area, R/o. H.No. 1 -:2 1 0, Mudigunta, Jaipur, Mancherial District.

¶695

The MeJical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep. by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶696

...RESPONDENTS

¶697

l.A. NO: 3 OF.2025

¶698

Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20400 ot 2023, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶699

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SR!P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶700

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶701

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶702

WRIT APPEAL NO: 706 OF 2025

¶703

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters^patent preferred against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19428 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Courr.

¶704

Between:

¶705

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶706

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagr:dem, Khammam District.

¶707

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶708

The Gt:neral Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

...APPELLANTS

AND

Ankam Sammaiah, S/o. Laxmaiah, Occ. Ex-General Mazdoor, E.C.No. 2616205, Mine - RK-6 lncline Srirampur Area, R/o.16-101 , Ganesh^Nagar, Naspur,Mancherial District.

¶713

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by^{its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶714

...RESPONDENTS

¶715

l.A. NO: 3 OF

¶716

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the^{circumstancesstated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleased to suspend} the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition^{No. 19428ot 2O23, pending} disposal of the writ appeal.

¶717

l.A. NO: 4OF 2025

¶718

Between:

¶719

Ankam Sammaiah, S/o. Laxmaiah, Occ.^{Ex-GeneralMazdoor, E.C.No.} 2616205, Mine - RKS lncline Srirampur^{Area, R/o.16-101} ,^GaneshNagar' Naspur, Mancherial District.

¶720

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.1

¶721

AND

¶722

1 . The Singareni Collieries Company^{Limited, Rep by its Chairmanand} Managing Dircctor, Singareni Bhavan^{Red Hills Hyderabad.}

¶723

The Director^(PA & W), The Singareni^{Collieries Company Limited(SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶724

The General Manager^{(Personnel)Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare^{Wing, Corporate PersonnelDepartment,} Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶725

The General Manager, Srirampur Area,^{The Singareni Collieries Company} Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area,^{Mancherial District.}

¶726

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical^{Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary)

¶727

...RESPONDENTS

¶728

¶729

Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order F,assed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No. 3 ot 2025 in, W.A. No. 706 of 2025, d,ated 09.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶730

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDOY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶731

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶732

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶733

WRIT APPEAL NO: 709 oF 2025

¶734

writ Apceal under clause 15 of the Letters^patent prefened against the order dated 30-08-21)24, in WP.No.18925 of 2O23 on the file of the High Court.

¶735

Between:

¶736

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited., Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

¶737

The Directo(PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagr.rdem Kammam District

¶738

The General Manager(Personnel), Welfare and CSR The Singareni Collieries Compa'ry Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing Corporate personnel Department Singare ni Bhavan Hyderabad

¶739

The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCI-) Srirampur Colony, Mancherial Mandal, Adilabad District

¶740

...APPELLANTS

¶741

AND

¶742

Nagunuri Saraiah, S/o Nagunuri Komuraiah Aged about Sg years Occ peon, E C No. 2861460 Area Workshop Srirampur Area, Rl/o Kg Colony Singapur Manchr:rial Srirampur Area Adilabad District.

¶743

The Mr:dical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad Telangana

...RESPONDENTS

t.A. NO oF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated^{in the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleasedto suspend} the order dated. 30-08-2024^passed in WP.No. 18925 of 2023,^{pendingdisposal of} the writ appeal.

¶748

t.A. NO 40F 2025

¶749

Between:

¶750

Nagunuri Saraiah, S/o Nagunuri Komuraiah Aged^{about 58 years OccPeon,} E C No. 2861460 Area Workshop Srirampur^{Area, Ri./oK8 Colony Singapur} Mancherial Srirampur Area Adilabad District.

¶751

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.1

¶752

AND

¶753

The Singareni Collieries Company^{Limited., Rep by its Chairmanand} Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills^HSerabad

¶754

The Directo(PA & W), The Singareni^{Collieries CompanyLimited (SCCL)} Kothagudem Kammam District

¶755

The General Manage(Personnel), Welfare^{and CSRThe Singareni Collieries} Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare^{Wing Corporate PersonnelDepartment} Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

¶756

The General Manager, Srirampur Area,^{The Singareni CollieriesCompany} Limited (SCCL) Srirampur Colony, Mancherial^{Mandal, Adilabad District}

¶757

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical^{Hospital,Repby its Superintendent} Padmarao Nagar Sec,trnderabad Telangana (R5 not necessary)

¶758

...RESPONDENTS

¶759

Petition under section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstances stated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{HighCourt may be pleased to vacate the} interim order^passed by this Hon'ble Court^{made in l.A.No.3 of 2025 in W.A. No 709} ot 2025. dated^{'10.07.2025,pending} disposal^{of the writ appeal.}

¶760

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN^{MOHANRAO' Sr. COUNSEL'REP.} SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY,^{SC FOR SCCL/} SRI S.RAHUL REDDY,^{SPL. GP, attached to the} O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE^GENERAL

¶761

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER,^{Sr. COUNSEL'REP.} SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶762

¶763

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶764

WRIT,APPEAL NO:7 110F 2025

¶765

writ Aplreal under clause 15 of the Letters^patent prefened Against the order Dated 30/08/2()24 in W.P.No.20273 of 2023 on the fite of the High Court.

¶766

Between:

¶767

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderab'ad.

¶768

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶769

The General Manager (Personnel) welfare and csR, The singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶770

a. lhe General Manager, Mandamani area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamarri, Mancherial District.

¶771

...APPELLANTS

¶772

AND

¶773

Sri Gurti lylaiah, S/o.Mallaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ.Ex-Trammer, E.C.No 2525365, Mine. KKS lnctine MM Area,Ri/o. D-324, A-Zone, Mancheriai District.

¶774

The Me:dical Board of Gandhi Medicar Hospitar, Rep by its superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶775

...RESPONDENTS

¶776

!.A. NO: 3 OF 202s

¶777

Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order dated.30-08-2024 passed in writ petition no.2o2l3 ot 2023 in the interest of^justice, penrling disposat of the writ appeal.

¶778

Counsel for tltre Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. Gp, attached to the O/o. ADDL. AOVOCATE GENERAL

¶779

Gounsel for the Respondent No.1: SRt L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶780

¶781

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶782

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preffered Against the Order Dated 3010812024 in W.P.No.20189 of 2O23 on the file of the High Court.

¶783

Between:

¶784

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

¶785

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Coltieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District

¶786

The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶787

The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Peddapalli District

¶788

...APPELLANTS

¶789

AND

¶790

[Vlutyam Devaiah, S/o.Rajaiah, aged about 63^years, Occ Ex-Trammer E.C.No.02758617, Mine RR-7 Bpa Srirampur, Singareni Colleries company Limited (SCCL) R/o. H.No.2910, Naspur, Nagarjuna Colony, Mancherial District

¶791

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana

¶792

...RESPONDENTS

¶793

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶794

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to^suspend the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 20189 of 2023ⁱⁿ the^interest of^justice, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶795

l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025

¶796

Between:

¶797

Mutyam Devaiah, S/o.Rajaiah, aged about 63^years, Occ^Ex-Trammer E.C.No.02758617, Mine RR-7 Bpa Srirarnpur, Singareni Colleries^company Limited (SCCL) R/o. H.No.2910, Naspur, Nagarjuna Colony,^lt/ancherial District

¶798

¶799

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.1

¶800

AND

¶801

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

¶802

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagurlem, Khammam District

¶803

The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries; Company Limited (SCCL) welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departm,ant, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

¶804

The Gerreral Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (TSCCL), Srirampur, Peddapalli District

¶805

The Meclical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana (R5 not necessary)

¶806

...RESPONDENTS

¶807

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No. 3 of 2025 in W.A. No. 712 of 2O25, dated 10.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶808

counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAo, sr. couNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶809

Gounsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, sr. CoUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶810

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶811

¶812

Writ Appeat under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 3010812024 in W.P.No.20209 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶813

Between:

¶814

The singareni collieries company Limited, Rep by its chairman and Managingl Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶815

The Direr:tor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶816

¶817

The General Manager^(Personnel) Welfare and GSR,^{The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate^{PersonnelDepartment,} SingareniBhavan Hyderabad,

¶818

The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni^{CollieriesCompany} Limited (SCCL), Srirampur, Adilabad District

¶819

ENII]

¶820

Saga Mallaiah, S/o. Venkaiah, aged^about 65^{years, Occ-Ex-General} Mazdoor, Mine SDL-RK7,^Bellampalli Area,^{SCCL, Ri/o. Bellampalli'} Mancherial District.

¶821

The Medical Board of Gandhi^{Medical Hospital, Repby its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad,^Telangana.

¶822

RESPONDENTS

¶823

¶824

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstances statedin the} affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleasedto suspend} the order dated 30.08.2024^{passed in Writ Petition No. 20209ol 20,23 in the interest} of^{justice, pending} disposal of^{the writ appeal.}

¶825

a 7M

¶826

Saga Mallaiah, S/o. Venkaiah,^{aged about 65 years, Occ- Ex-General} Mazdoor, Mine SDL-RK7,^{BellampalliArea, SCGL,Fi/o. Bellampalli'} Mancherial District.

¶827

...PETITIONER RESPIONDENT^No.1

¶828

¶829

The Singareni Collieries Company^{Limited,Rep by its Chairman and} Managing Director, Singareni^{Bhavan, Red Hills Hyderabad.}

¶830

The Director (PA and W),^{TheSingareniCollieries Company Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam^District.

¶831

The General Manager^{(Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited^{(SCCL) WelfareWing, Corporate PersonnelDepartment'} SingareniBhavan HYderabad,

¶832

The General Manager,^{SrirampurArea, TheSingareni Collieries Company} Limited (SCCL), Srirampur,^{Adilabad District}

¶833

The Medical Board of^{Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad,^Telangana. (R5 not necessary)

¶834

¶835

...RESPONDENTS

¶836

Petition r.rnder section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble court made in l.A.No. 3 ot 2o2s in w.A. No. 713 of 2025, dated 10.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶837

Counsel for the Appellants: SR! E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶838

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COIJNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶839

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Gp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶840

'4 I

¶841

writ Appeal under clause 1s of the Lefters patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.20687 of ZO23 on the fite of the High Court.

¶842

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶843

The Dircctor (PA and W), The Singareni Coltieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothag,.rdem, Khammam District.

¶844

The General Manager (Personnel) welfare and cSR, The singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singanrni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶845

4 Ln. Gglergl Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

¶846

AND

¶847

Chippakurthi Mallaiah, S/o. Peddulu, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex- Trammer, E. C. No. 1175515, Mine KK- 1 tnctine , R/o. H. No. 5- 99/1, Rapally, Mandanani Area, Mancherial District.

¶848

The Mr:dical Board of Gandhi Medicar Hospitar, Rep by its superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

RESPONDENTS

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in^the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^{pleasedto suspend} the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition^{No. 20687ot 2023in the interest} of^{justice, pending} disposal of the writ appeal. LA. NO: 4OF 2025

¶853

Between:

¶854

Chippakurthi Mallaiah, S/o. Peddulu, aged about^{63 years,Occ Ex- Trammer,} E. C. No. 1175515, Mine KK- 1 lncline, R/o.^{H.No.5-99/1,Rapally,} Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

¶855

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.l

¶856

AND

¶857

The Singareni Collieries Company^{Limited, Rep by its Chairman and} Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red^{Hills Hyderabad'}

¶858

The Director^(PA and W), The Singareni^{CollieriesCompany Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶859

The General Manager^{(Personnel) Welfare and CSR,The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited^{(SCCL) WelfareWing, Corporate PersonnelDepartment'} Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶860

The General Manager,^{Mandamani,The Singareni Collieries Company} Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area,^{MancherialDistrict.}

¶861

The Medical Board of^{Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent'} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad,^Telangana. (R5 not necessary)

¶862

...RESPONDENTS

¶863

Petition under section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto vacate the} interim order^passed by this Hon'ble^{Court made in l.A.M. 3ot 2025 in W.A. No' 7'14} ot 2025, dated 1 1.07.2025,^{pending disposal of the writ appeal.}

¶864

Counsel for the Appellants: SR!^{E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO,Sr. COUNSEL'REP.} SRI P.SR! HARSHA REODY, SC FOR^SCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REODY, SPL. GP,^{attachedto the} O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶865

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER,Sr' COUNSEL'REP.} SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶866

¶867

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEOTCAL HEALTH & FW

¶868

WRIT APPEALNd:.?i 5'i5F-2025

¶869

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters^patent preferred against the order Dated 30/08/2()24 in writ petition No.20257 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶870

Between:

¶871

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

¶872

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagu,dem, Khammam District.

¶873

g. In9 Gr>neral Manager (Personnel), Wetfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Departntent, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶874

4 Lh" G91_eg! Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Coltieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶875

...APPELLANTS

¶876

AND

¶877

Bomma Guruvaiah, S/o Bomma Durgaiah, aged about 66years, Occ- Ex-Coal Cutter, E.C.No. 422456, Mine -lK1A lncline,singareni Colleries Limited SCCL Srirampur Area,R/o. Mancherial, District

¶878

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospitat, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana

¶879

...RESPONDENTS

¶880

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶881

Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the'petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order dater) 3oloal2o24 passed in writ petition No. 202s7 of 2023 in the interest, of^justice, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶882

l.A. NO:4 OF 2025

¶883

Between:

¶884

Bomma Guruvaiah, S/o Bomma Durgaiah, aged about 66years, Occ_ Ex_Coal Cutter, E.C.No.422456, Mine -lK.lA lncline,Singareni Cotieries Limited SCCI Srirampur Area, R/o. Mancherial, District

¶885

¶886

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.1

¶887

AND

¶888

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman^and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan^{Red Hills Hyderabad}

¶889

The Director^(PA and W), The^{SingareniCollieries Company Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶890

The General Manager^{(Personnel),Welfare} and^{CSR, TheSingareni} Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare^{Wing, CorporatePersonnel} Department, Singareni Bhavan^Hyderabad,

¶891

The General Manager, Srirampur Area,^{The Singareni CollieriesCompany} Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial^District.

¶892

The Medicat Board of Gandhi Medical^{Hospital,Rep by its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad,^Telangana. (R5 not necessary)

¶893

...RESFONDENTS

¶894

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the} interim order^passed by this^{Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No. 3 of 2O25 in W.A. No. 715} of 2025, dated 11.O7.2025,^{pending disposal of the writ appeal.}

¶895

Counset for the Appellants:^SRI E.MADAN^{MOHAN RAO,Sr. COUNSEL, REP.} SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC^{FOR SCCL} / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL.^GP, attached^{to the} O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶896

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP.} SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶897

Counsel for the Respondent No.2:^{GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW}

¶898

Writ Appeal under clause¹⁵ of the^{Letters Patent preferred againstthe order} dated 3OtOBl2O24 in W.P.No.19650 ot^{2023on the file of the High Court.}

¶899

Between

¶900

The Singareni Collieries Company^{Limited,Rep by its Chairman and} Managing Director, Singareni^{Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.}

¶901

The Director, (PA & W) The Singareni^{Collieries Company Limited(SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam^District.

¶902

¶903

The Gerneral Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Departnrent, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶904

The General Manager, Mandamani Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited r'SCCL), Mandamani Area, Adilabad District.

¶905

...APPELLANTS

¶906

AND

¶907

Minumula Ramchander, S/o. Kistaiah, aged about 60 years, Occ. Ex-Coal Filler, E.C.No. 2613809, Mine: Kasipet-1 lncline, Mandamarn Area, R"yo. H.No. 1-26, Kondur, Mancherial District.

¶908

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶909

...RESPONDENTS

¶910

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶911

Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in writ Petition No. 19650 of 2o23 in the interest of^justice, penrling disposal of the writ petition.

¶912

l.A. NO: 4OF 2025

¶913

Between:

¶914

Minumula Ramchander, S/o. Kistaiah, aged about 60 years, Occ. Ex-Coal Filler, E.C.No. 2613809, Mine: Kasipet-l lncline, Mandamarri Area, R/o. H.No. 1 -26, Kr>ndur, lvlancherial District.

¶915

...PETIT]ONER/RESPONDENT No. 1

¶916

AND

¶917

'1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶918

The Dircctor, (PA & W) The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶919

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collierit:s Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Departrnent, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶920

4 I.h" Ge19g! Manager, Mandamarri Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Adilabad District.

¶921

The Modical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its superintendent, Padma.ao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

...RESPONDENTS

(R5 not necessary)

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{statedin the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High^{Court may be pleasedto vacate the} interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in LA.No.^{3 ot 2025 in W.A. No. 716} ot 2025, dated 11.07.2025,^pending disposal of the^{writ appeal.}

¶926

Gounsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN^{MOHAN RAO,Sr. COUNSEL, REP.} SRI P.SRI HARSHA REODY, SC FOR SCCL^/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶927

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER,^{Sr' COUNSEL, REP.} SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶928

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP^{FOR MEDICAL HEALTH& FW}

¶929

WRIT

¶930

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters^{Patent preferred against the order} dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.2O515 ot 2023^{on the file of the High Court.}

¶931

Between:

¶932

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited,^{Rep by its Chairman and} Managing Dircctor, Singareni Bhavan^{Red Hills Hyderabad.}

¶933

The Director^(PA and W), The^{Singareni CollieriesCompany Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶934

The General Manager^{(Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare^{Wing, Corporate PersonnelDepartment,} Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶935

The General Manager, SRP,^{The Singareni Collieries CompanyLimited} (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶936

...APPELLANTS

¶937

AND

¶938

Sri Madineni Posham , S/o.^{Mallaiah, aged about 63 years,Occ.Ex-Timber,} E.C.No. 2540569, Mine. Rk-6 lncline,^{SrirampurArea, R/o.H.No.4$7,} Vempally, Mancherial District.

¶939

The Medical Board of Gandhi^{Medical Hospital, Repby its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad,^Telangana.

...RESPONDENTS

l.A. NO: 3 OF 025

Petition r" nder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order date(l 30.o8.2o24 passed in writ. Petition No. 20515 of 2023 in the interest of^justice, pencling disposal of the writ appeal.

¶944

1.A. NO: 4OF 2025

¶945

Between:

¶946

Sri Madineni Posham, S/o. Mallaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-Timber, E.C.No. 2540569, Mine. Rk-6 lncline, Srirampur Area, R/o. H.No.4-67, Vempal ly, Mancherial District.

¶947

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No. 1

¶948

AND

¶949

1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶950

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶951

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Comparry Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶952

The Gr:neral Manager, SRP, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶953

The Mr:dical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padma'ao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not: necessary)

¶954

...RESPONDENTS

¶955

Petition .rnder Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble court made in l.A.No. 3 of 2o2s in w.A. No. 717 of 2025, datecl 1 1 .07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶956

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶957

¶958

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶959

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶960

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^prefened against the order dated 30-08-2024 in W.P No.19627 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶961

Between:

¶962

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman^and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶963

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company^{Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶964

The General Manager^(Personnel) Welfare and CSR,^The Singareni^Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate^{PersonnelDepartment,} Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶965

The General Manager, Mandamani, The Singareni Collieries^Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

¶966

...APPELLANTS

¶967

AND

¶968

Katla Rajaiah, S/o Posham, aged about 63^years, Occ.^Ex- General^Manager, E.C.No. 2077477, Mine . KK-1 lncline , Fi/o.^{H.No. 5-49,KasireddyPalli,} Mandamani Area, Mancherial District.

¶969

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital,^{Rep by its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶970

...RESPONDENTS

¶971

l.A. NO: 3 OF

¶972

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praylng that in the circumstances^{statedin the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleasedto suspend} the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition^{No. 19627 ot 2O23in the interest} of^{justice, pending} disposal of the writ appeal.

¶973

¶974

i 40F

¶975

Katla Rajaiah, S/o Posham, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex- General Manager, E.C.No. 2077477, Mine . KK-1 lncline, Fl/o. H.No. S-49, Kasireddy palli, Mandanrarri Area, Mancherial District.

¶976

NER/RESPONDENT No.1

¶977

AND

¶978

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶979

The Din;ctor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶980

The Gerreral Manager (Personnel) welfare and csR, The singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singareri Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶981

4 The General Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamarri Area, Mancherial District.

¶982

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary)

¶983

...RESPONDENTS

¶984

Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the af{idavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble court made in l.A.No. 3 ot 2o2s in w.A. No. 728 ot 2025, daled 14.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶985

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SR! P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENER.AL

¶986

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶987

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶988

¶989

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters Patent^{prefened againstthe order} dated 30-08-2024 inW .P No. 3041 I ot 2023 on^{the file of the High Court.}

¶990

Between:

¶991

The Singareni Collieries Company^{Limited,Rep by its Chairman and} Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills^Hyderabad.

¶992

The Director^(PA and W), The Singareni^{Collieries Company Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶993

The General Manager^{(Personnel)Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare^{Wing,Corporate PersonnelDepartment,} Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶994

The General Manager, Mandamani, The^{Singareni Collieries Company} Limited (SCCL), Mandamarri Area,^{Mancherial District.}

¶995

APPELLANTS

¶996

ENI'

¶997

Md. Vazeer, S/o. Late Hussaian,^{aged about 62 years, Occ. Ex-Trammer,} E.C.No. 2587236, Mine. KK-1 lncline,^{Rl/o. Mandamani Area,Mancherial} District.

¶998

The Medical Boad of Gandhi Medical^{Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶999

...RESPONDENTS

¶1000

30F

¶1001

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleasedto suspend} the order dated 30.08.2024^{passed in Writ Petition No. 30418 of 2023 in the interest} of^{justice, pending} disposal of the^{writ petition.}

¶1002

oF 2025

¶1003

Md. Vazeer, S/o. Late Hussaian,^{aged about 62 years, Occ. Ex-Trammer,} E.C.No. 2587296, Mine. KK-1^{lncline, Ri/o. MandamarriArea' Mancherial} District.

¶1004

PETITIONER/RESPONOENT^No.1

¶1005

AND

¶1006

¶1007

1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1008

The Din:ctor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagu dem, Khammam District.

¶1009

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Comparry Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personnel Department, Singarerri Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1010

Lh" Geleral Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited [SCCL), Mandamarri Area, Mancherial District.

¶1011

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not necessary)

¶1012

...RESPONDENTS

¶1013

Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble court made in l.A.No. 3 ot 2o2s in w.A. No. 736 of 2025, dated 14.07.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶1014

Gounsel forthe Appellants: SRt E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDOY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1015

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRt L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1016

Counsel for tlre Respondent No.2: Gp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1017

W-F{ii,APPEAL NO:737 0F 2025

¶1018

writ Appeal under clause 1s of the Letters patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19619 of 2023 on the fite of the High Court.

¶1019

Between:

¶1020

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1021

The Director (PA and w), The singareni coilieries company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1022

The General Manager (Personnel) welfare and csR, The singareni collieries compa ry Limited (sccL) werfare wing, corporate personier Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1023

¶1024

The General Manager, Mandamani^{Area,The Singareni Collieries Company} Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area,^{Mancherial District.}

¶1025

.APPELLANTS

¶1026

Durgam Gangaram, S/o. Posham,^{aged about 63 years, Occ.Coal Cufter,} E.C.No. 2043371, Mine. Kasipet-1^{lncline, MandamarriArea,Rl/o. 2-137'} Pochamma Line, Tandur, Mancherial^District.

¶1027

fhe Medical Board of Gandhi^{Medical Hospital,Rep by its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad,^Telangana.

¶1028

RESPONDENTS

¶1029

Petition under section^{151 CPC praytng thatin the circumstances statedin the} aftidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High court may be pleasedto suspend} the order dated 3o.o8.2o24^{passed in writPetitionNo. 196't9 of 2O23in the interest} of^{justice,pending} disposal^{of the writ appeal.}

¶1030

o 40F

¶1031

Durgam Gangaram, S/o. Posham,^{aged about 63 years,Occ. Coal Cutter,} E.C.No. 2043371, Mine.^{Kasipe!1lncline, MandamaniArea, R/o.2-'137'} Pochamma Line, Tandur,^{Mancherial District.}

¶1032

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT^No.1

¶1033

¶1034

The Singareni Collieries^{Company Limited,Rep by its Chairman and} Managing Director, Singareni^{Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.}

¶1035

The Director^(PA and^{W), The SingareniCollieries Company Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam^District.

¶1036

The General Manager^{(Personnel)welfareand csR,The singareni collieries} Company Limited^{(SCCL)Welfare Wing,Corporate PersonnelDepartment,} Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1037

The General Manager,^{Mandamani Area,The Singareni Collieries Company} Limited (SCCL), Mandamarri^{Area, Mancherial District.}

¶1038

The Medical Board of^{Gandhi Medical Hospital,Rep by its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad,^Telangana. (R5 not necessary)

¶1039

...RESPONDENTS

¶1040

¶1041

Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble court made in l.A.No.3 ot 2o2s in w.A. No. 737 ot 2025, daled 14.07.2025, pending disposat of the writ appeal.

¶1042

Counsel forttre Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1043

Counsel forttre Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. GOUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1044

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1045

738 0F TIVF,

¶1046

writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Letters patent prefened against the order dated 30.08.2()24 in writ Petition No. 1991 7 ot 2023 on the file of the High court.

¶1047

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and. Managirrg Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1048

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Coilieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1049

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and cSR, The singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personiel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

¶1050

+. Ih" Grilqql Manager, Mandamani, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Mandamarri Area, Mancherial District.

¶1051

Otla Jr;eva Ratnam, S/o.Rajaratnam, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex_ Supportman, E.C.No.020961 12, Mine . KKd tnctine MM Arei, Rfo. X.ruo. g_S_ 48, Sha:msheer Nagar, Mancherial District.

¶1052

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medicar Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana

RESPONDENTS

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC^prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 19917^{ot 2023in the interest} of^{justice, pending} disposal of the writ appeal. l.A. NO:4OF2025

¶1057

Between:

¶1058

Otla Jeeva Ratnam, S/o.Rajaratnam,^{aged about} 63^{years, Occ.Ex-} Supportman, E.C.No.020961 12, Mine^{. KKS lncline MM Area, R/o. H.No. 9-5-} 48, Shamsheer Nagar, Mancherial District.

¶1059

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.1

¶1060

AND

¶1061

The Singareni Collieries Company^Limited,Rep by^{its Chairman and.} Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills^Hyderabad.

¶1062

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni^{Collieries Company Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1063

The General Manager^{(Personnel)Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate^{PersonnelDepartment,} Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

¶1064

The General Manager, Mandamarri, The^{Singareni Collieries Company} Limited (SCCL), Mandamani Area,^{Mancherial District.}

¶1065

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical^{Hospital,Rep by its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana (R5 not necessary)

¶1066

...RESPONDENTS

¶1067

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the} affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the HighCourt maybe pleasedto vacate the} interim order^passed by this Hon'ble^{Court made in l.A.No. 3 of 2O25 in W.A. No. 738} ot 2025, dated 14.07.2025,^{pending disposal of the writ petition.}

¶1068

Counsel for the Appellants: SRt E.MADAN^{MOHANRAO, Sr. COUNSEL'REP.} SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL^/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to^the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1069

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.1: SR! L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. GOUNSEL' REP-} SRICH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1070

¶1071

Counsel for thre Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1072

WRlr APitEAI-NOi'i{5'oF 2b2s

¶1073

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred against the Order Dated 30/08/2024 in WP.No.19229 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1074

Between:

¶1075

1 . The Si,lgareni Collieries Company Limiteci, Rep by its Chairman and Managirrg Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1076

The Din:ctor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District

¶1077

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

¶1078

4 The Gerneral Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District

¶1079

...APPELLANTS

¶1080

AND

¶1081

Shaik Gulam Rasool, S/o. Shaik Hyder, aged about 63 years Occ. MV DRlVEtt E.C.No.02991859, Singareni Cottories Co. Ltd., (SCCL) R/o D.134 CCC Colony, CCC Naspur, Adilabad District.

¶1082

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1083

...RESPONDENTS

¶1084

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶1085

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in writ Petition No. 19229 ot 2023 in the interest of^justice, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶1086

l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025

¶1087

Between:

¶1088

Shaik Gulam Rasool, S/o. Shaik Hyder, aged about 69 years Occ. MV DRIVER E.C-No.02991859, Singareni Coflories Co. Ltd., (SCCL) iVo O.te+ CCC Colony, CCC Nasp,ur, Adilabad District.

¶1089

...PETtTtONER/RESpONDENT No.1

¶1090

AND

¶1091

¶1092

The Singareni Collieries Company^{Limited, Rep} by^{its Chairman and} Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red^{Hills Hyderabad.}

¶1093

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni^{Collieries Company Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District

¶1094

The General Manager^{(Personnel)Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare^{Wing,Corporate PersonnelDepartment'} Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

¶1095

The General Manager, Srirampur^{Area,The Singareni CollieriesCompany} Limited^(SCCL), Srirampur Area,^{Mancherial District}

¶1096

The Medical Board of Gandhi^{Medical Hospital,Rep by its Superintendent'} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad,^Telangana. (R5 not necessary)

¶1097

...RESPONDENTS

¶1098

Petition under section 151 cPC^{praying that in the circumstancesstated in the} affidavit filed in support of^{the petition, the High court maybe pleasedto vacate the} interim order^passed by this Hon'ble^{Court made in l-A.No.3of 2025in W.A.No. 743} of 2O25, dated 15.07.2025,^{pending disposal of the writ appeal.}

¶1099

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI^{E.MADAN MOHAN RAO,Sr. COUNSEL' REP'} SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC^{FOR SCCL} ' SRI S.RAHUL REODY, SPL. GP,^{attached to the} O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1100

Gounsel forthe Respondent^{No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER'Sr. COUNSEL' REP'} SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1101

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW}

¶1102

ffit.?APFEAt NO:756 OF 2025

¶1103

Writ Appeal under clause^{15 of the Lefters Patent prefened againstthe oder} dated 30/08/2024inW.P No.19354^{of 2023 on thefileof the HighCourt.}

¶1104

Between:

¶1105

The Singareni Collieries^{Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and} Managing Director, Singareni^{Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.}

¶1106

The Director^(PA and^{W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam^District-

¶1107

The General Manager^{(Personnel)welfareand cSR, The Singarenicollieries} Company Limited^{(SCCL) WelfareWing,Corporate PersonnelDepartment'} SingareniBhavan HYderabad,

¶1108

¶1109

The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited TiSCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial District.

¶1110

AND

¶1111

...APPELLANTS

¶1112

'1. Karengula Rajaiah, S/o.Venkataiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Coal Cufter, E.C.No. 2825480, RK€lncline, Singareni Coileries Co. Ltd (SCCL) R/o. e.No. ND-3031 , Nagarjuna Colony, Mancherial, District.

¶1113

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1114

...RESPONDENTS

¶1115

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶1116

Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order daterl 30.08.2024 passed in writ Petition No. 19354 ot 2023 in the interest of^justice, pending disposal of the writ appeal.

¶1117

l.A. NO: 4OF 2025

¶1118

Between:

¶1119

Karengrrla Rajaiah, S/o.Venkataiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Coal Cutter, E.C.No. 2825480, RK€lncline, Singareni Colteries Co. Ltd (SCCL) R/o. e.No. ND-3031, Nagarjuna Colony, Mancherial, District.

¶1120

...PETITIONER/RESpONDENT No.1

¶1121

AND

¶1122

'l . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1123

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagr.rdem, Khammam District.

¶1124

The General Manager (Personnel) welfare and csR, The singareni collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate personiel Department, Singare,niBhavan Hyderabad,

¶1125

4 I.t'" c91e1a] Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Coilieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial Districi.

¶1126

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, P_adma ?o Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana. (R5 not: necessary)

¶1127

...RESPONDENTS

¶1128

¶1129

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court made in l.A.No. 3 of 2025 in W.A. No. 756 of 2025, dated 17.O7.2025, pending disposal of the writ appeat.

¶1130

Gounsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1131

Counsel for the Respondent No.I: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1132

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1133

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Lefters Patent preffered Against the Order Dated 30-08-2024 in W.P.No 20285 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1134

Between:

¶1135

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

¶1136

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1137

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad

¶1138

The General Manager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Srir:ampur, Mancherial District

¶1139

...APPELLANTS

¶1140

AND

¶1141

Liyakath Ali Khan, S/o Syamkhan, aged about 63 years, Occ Ex-Foreman, E.C.No. 2752700, Mine RK-lndine Srirampur Area, Singareni Colleries Co. Ltd (SCCL) R/o. Ramakrishnapuram Adilabad District

¶1142

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana

RESPONDENTS

l.A. NO: 3OF 202s

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order datr:d 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20285 of 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1147

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1148

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1149

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1150

WRIT APPEAL NO: 772OF:2O25

¶1151

Writ Appreal under clause 't5 of the Letters Patent preferred against the Order Dated. 30-08-2,124, in WP.No .2O787 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1152

Between:

¶1153

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited., Rep by its Chairman and Managinl; Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1154

The Direr:tor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothaguclem, Khammam District.

¶1155

The Gent:ral Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Wetfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1156

The General Manager, Sriramapur Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Sriramapur Area, Mancheriyal District.

¶1157

...APPELLANTS

¶1158

AND

¶1159

Ellavelli Satyanarayana, S/o Narayana, aged about 63 years Occ Ex Coal Cutter E 3 No 2765606 Mine RK 8 Srirampur Area Singareni Collieries Company Limited SCCL Ri/o Krishna Colony Srirampur Mandal Mancherial District

¶1160

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

...RESPONDENTS

l.A. NO:3OF2025

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1166

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1167

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1168

wnr irFFEAffi NOi[f 63XiF,2o2s

¶1169

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the Order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19524 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1170

Between:

¶1171

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, SingareniBhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1172

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1173

The Genenal Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, SingareniBhavan H$erabad,

¶1174

The General Manager, Kothagudem Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1175

...APPELLANTS

¶1176

ANO

¶1177

'l . Kandula Venkatranarayana, S/o Gopaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. ExGeneral Mazdoor, E.C.No. 0440894, Mine Work shop, Corporate, Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), R/ o. Q. No SD-l9, 24 Area, Yellandu, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1178

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

...RESPONDENTS

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order daterd 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19524 ot 2O23 in the interest of^justice.

¶1183

Counsel for tlie Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL i SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, aftached to the o/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1184

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRICH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1185

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1186

WRIT APPEAL NO: 894 OF 2025

¶1187

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30-08-20:24 in W.P.No.19655 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1188

Between:

¶1189

The Sinllareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managingr Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1190

The Direc:tor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1191

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1192

The General Manager, Kothagudem Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1193

...APPELLANTS

¶1194

AND

¶1195

'I . Pudery Stranker, S/o. P Sammaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-Drill Operator, 11. C.No. 4037936, Mine . GKOC, KGM Area, Singareni Collieries Company t-imited (SCCL) R/o. Kothagudem Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1196

The Medic;rl Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao \agar Secunderabad, Telangana.

...RESPONDENTS

I.A. NO: 3OF 2025

counserrortheApperr"""'3[i=.:3AlfXtiXttSiq'Ss."3-'S3Ei,- SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1202

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKATRAMAN

¶1203

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1204

WRIT APPEAL o 25

¶1205

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^prefened against the Order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19718 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1206

Between:

¶1207

't . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1208

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1209

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1210

The General Manager, Mandamarri Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1211

...APPELLANTS

¶1212

AND

¶1213

Gopi Nagabhushanam, S/o. Narsaiah, aged about 6b years, Occ. Ex-Haulage Operator, VK-7 lncline, KGM Area, SCCL R/o. e.No.S, Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1214

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Sccunderabad, Telangana.

...RESPONDENTS

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dat€,d 30.O8.2024 passed in Writ. Petition No. 19718 of 2O23 in the interest of^justice.

¶1219

Counsel for tire Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1220

Counsel for tfre Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1221

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1222

WRITAPPEAL NO: 897 OF 202s

¶1223

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/20114 in W.P.No.2O673 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1224

Between:

¶1225

1 . The Sinllareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1226

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagud,:m, Khammam District.

¶1227

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Departmerrt, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1228

The General Manager, Yellandu Area, The^{Singareni Collieries Company} Limited (S(ICL), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri^{KothagudemDistrict.}

¶1229

...APPELLANTS

¶1230

AND

¶1231

Manga Satyanarayana, S/o. M Odelu, aged about 63^{years, Occ.Ex-Pump} Operator, E.C.No. 267709, Mine:^{PVK-S lncline,Ramagudam-lArea,} Singareni Oolleries Co. Ltd^{(SCCL) R/o.H.No 8-2-164, Writerbasthi, 22 yatd'} Gollagudenr, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem^District.

¶1232

The Medicirl Board of Gandhi^{lvledicalHospital, Repby its Superintendent,} Padmarao ltlagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

...RESPONDENTS

!.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 3O.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 20673 ot 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1237

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REODY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1238

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1239

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1240

WRIT APPEAL NO

¶1241

Writ Appeal under clause^'15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30-08-2024 in W.P.No.19863 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1242

Between:

¶1243

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1244

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1245

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Wefare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1246

The General Manager, Kothagudem Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1247

...APPELLANTS

¶1248

AND

¶1249

Komaragiri Ananthaiah, S/o. K. Veerabhadraiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex- Trammer, VK-7 lncline, Kothagudem Area, SCCL, Ri/ o. H. No 5-1-97, NK Nagar, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem (Khammam)District.

¶1250

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

...RESPONDENTS

l.A. NO:3O

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order date,d 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19863 of 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1255

Counsel for tlre Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1256

Counsel for ttre Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1257

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1258

WRIT APPEAL NO: 926 OF 202s

¶1259

Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Lefters Patent prefered against the order dated 30/08/20114 in W.P.No.19875 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1260

Between:

¶1261

I . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managingl Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1262

The Direc'tor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1263

The Gene,ral Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1264

The General Manager, Kothagudem Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1265

...APPELLANTS

¶1266

AND

¶1267

Verukonda Satyanarayana, S/o. Edukondalu, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex - Conveyor Operator, E.C.No. 4047169, KGM Area, Singareni Colleries Co. LId(SCCL) Rl/o. Writer Basthi, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1268

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

...RESPONDENTS

l.A. NO:3OF2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 19875 of 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1273

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REODY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the o/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1274

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1275

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDIGAL HEALTH & FW

¶1276

WRr nppeAL No: 927 oF,ziiii

¶1277

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19658 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1278

Between:

¶1279

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1280

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1281

The General Manager,^(Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The^Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate^Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1282

The General Manager, Kothagudem Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1283

...APPELLANTS

¶1284

AND

¶1285

Kampally Durgaiah, S/o. K Ramulu, aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-General Mazdoor, E.C.No. 0228284, Mine: Gothamkhani, Kothagudem Area, Singareni Colliries Company Limited (sccl) R/o. H.No. 16-2-218, Nagaiahgadda, Ramavaram, Garibpeta(Rural), Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1286

¶1287

The lvledical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmirrao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1288

...RESPONDENTS

¶1289

l.A. NO: 3 Of:2025

¶1290

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed^rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in writ Petition No. 19658 ot 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1291

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MAOAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. AOVOCATE GENERAL

¶1292

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SR! CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1293

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1294

wRiT''AFFeAL'ttOl szs oF 2025

¶1295

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.20634 of 2023 on the fite of the High Cou(

¶1296

Between:

¶1297

1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1298

The Direclor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudt:m, Khammam District.

¶1299

The Genr:ral Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1300

The General Manager, Bhupalapally, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Bhupalapally Area, Jayashankar Bhupalpalli District.

¶1301

...APPELLANTS

¶1302

AND

¶1303

Dunde Rajaiah, S/o. Venkataiah, aged about 63^years, Occ. Ex-Trammer, E.C.No. 2043915, Mine .KTK -1 and lA lncline, Bhupalpalli Area, SCCL R/o. H. No. 541 , Mellenium Quarters, Bhupalpally, Jayashankar Bhupalpalli District.

¶1304

¶1305

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmamo Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1306

...RESPONDENTS

¶1307

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶1308

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 20634 ot 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1309

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL ' SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1310

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. GOUNSEL, REP. SR! CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1311

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEOICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1312

Wnir'aFpeAl Noi^gso OF2ozs

¶1313

Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of th€ Letters Patent prefened against the Order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.2O026 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1314

Between:

¶1315

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rpp by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1316

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1317

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Gorporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1318

The General Manager, Kothgudem Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1319

...APPELLANTS

¶1320

ANO

¶1321

1 Madipoju Sreenu, S/o. M. Venkataiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex-pump Operator, VK-7 lnctine, KGM Area, SCCL, R/o.H.No. fi:223, Subhash Nagai, Yellandu, Khammam District.

¶1322

¶1323

The tVledical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1324

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1325

...RESPONDENTS

¶1326

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶1327

Petition^r.rnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order date,l 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20026 ot 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1328

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1329

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SR! CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1330

Gounsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1331

yyps:aiipfffiffi:'i ib3'Or zozs

¶1332

Writ Apperal under clause^'15 of the Letters Patent preffered against the Order Dated 30-08-202i4 Passed in W.P.No.19654 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1333

Between:

¶1334

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶1335

The Direclor^(PA & W), The Singareni^{Collieries Company Limited(SCCL)} Kothagude'm, Khammam District.

¶1336

The General Manager^{(Personnel)welfareand cSR, The Singarenicollieries} Company Limited^{(SCCL) WelfareWing, Corporate PersonnelDepartment,} Singareni []havan Hyderabad,

¶1337

The General Manager, Mandamarri^{Area, The Singareni CollieriesCompany} Limited^(SCCL), Bhadradri^{Kothagudem, Adilabad District.}

...APPELLANTS

AND

Adepu Rajesham, S/o.Poshamallu, aged about 63^{years, Occ Ex-General} Mazdoor, CSP, Manuguru, Singareni Collieries Company Limited(SCCL),^FUo Kondapur,Khammam District

¶1342

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical^Hospital, Rep by^{its Superintendent,} Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana

¶1343

.RESFONDENTS

¶1344

l.A. NO: 3OF 2025

¶1345

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the afiidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^may be^{pleasedto suspend} the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 1965,tof^{2023 in} the^interest of^justice.

¶1346

Gounsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN^RAO, Sr.^{COUNSEL, REP.} SRI P.SRI HARSHA SC FORSCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1347

Counset for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANOER'^{Sr. COUNSEL, REP.} SRI CH.VENKATRAMAN

¶1348

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH &^FW

¶1349

NO: 1164 OF

¶1350

Writ Appeal under clause¹ 5 of the Letters Patent Prefened against^{the Order} Dated^'t3108/2024 in W.P.No.2O275 of 2023 on the file of the^{High Court.}

¶1351

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its^{Chairman and} Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan^{Red Hills} Hyderabad. :

¶1352

The Director^(PA and W),^{The Singareni CollieriesCompany Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1353

The General Manager^(Personnel) Welfare and^{CSR, The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel^Departrnent, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1354

The General Manager, Ramagundam Area{, The Singareni. Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Peddapalli District.

¶1355

AND

¶1356

¶1357

Basaboina Rayalingu, S/o.Basaboina lylaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ ExSupport Man, E.C.No. 900315, Mine GDK 2 and 2A lncline, RGl, Area, Ri/o. H. No.i'-1 -3/36, GM Colony, Godavarikhani Ramagundam Peddapalli District.

¶1358

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padma rao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana

¶1359

...RESPONDENTS

¶1360

t.A. 5

¶1361

Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the afficiavit fileci ir support of the petition, the High court may be pieased to suspend the order daterl 3008.2024 passed in writ Petition No. 2027s ot 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1362

Counsel for thre Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1363

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1364

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDTCAL HEALTH & FW

¶1365

TIITIr)

¶1366

Writ Appr:al under clause 15 of the Letters^patent preferred Against Order Dated 30/08/202i4 in WP.No.19818 of 2023 on the fite of the High Court.

¶1367

Between:

¶1368

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep its Chairman and Managing Director, S;imeareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

¶1369

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Cottieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudt:m, Khammam District.

¶1370

The Genr>ral Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶1371

The General Manager, Mandamani Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SOCL), Ragundam Area, Peddapalli District.

¶1372

AND

¶1373

¶1374

Devasani Krishna, S/o.Devasani Posham, aged about 65^years Occ.^Ex-Rope Splicer, G.D.K-S RG-|, Area, sccl, Rl/o. D,-2172 Tilak Nagar, Godavarikhani, Peddapalli District.

¶1375

2 The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical HoSpital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1376

...RESPONDENTS

¶1377

l.A. NO: 3OF 2025

¶1378

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 3O.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 19818 ot 2O23 in the interest of^justice.

¶1379

Gounsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FORSCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. AOVOCATE GENERAL

¶1380

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRt L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1381

Counse! forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1382

WRff[FFEAt''tt6: ti6z oF zozs

¶1383

Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Letters Patent Appeal prefened against the Orderdated 3010812024 in W.P.No.19780 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1384

Between:

¶1385

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1386

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1387

The General Manager, (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1388

The General Manager, Ramagundam Area-|, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area,^peddapalli District.

...APPELLANTS

AND

Marikilla Kanakaiah, S/o. Marikilla Lingaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. ExTrammer, E.C.No. 941727, Mine . GDK 2 and 2A lncline, RG-|, R/o. H.No.289, Chinnaboungur, Sulthanabad, Peddapalii District.

¶1393

The M,edical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1394

...RESPONDENTS

¶1395

l.A. NO: 3OF 2O2s

¶1396

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied iii support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to suspend the order datert 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19780 ot 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1397

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1398

Counsel for thr: Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1399

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1400

WRIT APPEA.L NO: 1T6Eb"FEOZ5

¶1401

Writ Apperal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30.08.202.4 in Writ Petition No.19422 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1402

Between:

¶1403

1 . The Sing,areni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1404

The Direc,tor (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries^{Company Limited'} Kothagude'm, Khammam

¶1405

The General Manager^(Personnel) Welfare and^{CSR, The Singareni} Collieries.Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare^{Wing, CorporatePersonal} Departmert, Singareni bhavan Hyderabad.

¶1406

The Gene:ral Manager, Ramagundam area, The^{SingareniCollieries} Company L.imited (SCCL), RamagundamJ, Peddapalli^District

...APPELLANTS

AND

Kekerla Veerasham, S/o. Kekerla Komurelli, aged^{about 63 years, Occ:Ex-} General Mazdoor, E.C.No.912590, Mine: GDK-S lncline, RG-|, SCCL,^R/o. H.No.8-3-580, Seeta Nagar, Godavarikhani, Peddapalli District.

¶1411

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmaia. Nagar Secunderabad Telangana

¶1412

...RESPONDENTS

¶1413

l.A. NO: 3OF 2025

¶1414

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No.19422 of 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1415

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1416

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRICH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1417

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1418

wRff AFPEIlIfri6ffii"60b F, zd2 s

¶1419

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred against the Order Dated 30/08/2024, in W.P.No.2@O3 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1420

Between:

¶1421

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Direc{or, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶1422

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1423

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad.

¶1424

4 ].heGeneral Manager, Manuguru Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Manuguru, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

...APPELLANTS

AND

1 . Syed lsaque, S/o. Syed Hussain, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-EP Operator, E.C.N,:. 4031257, PKOC-4, Manuguru Area, Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), R/o, H. No. 533, P.V. Colony, Manguru Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1429

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep. by its Superintendent, Padmerrao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1430

...RESPONDENTS

¶1431

!.A. NO: 3OF 2025

¶1432

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dater1 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20003 ot 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1433

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1434

Counsel for thrr Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRICH.VENI(AT RAMAN

¶1435

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1436

WRIT APPEAL NO: 1171 OF 2025

¶1437

Writ Appe'al under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred against the Order Dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.19911 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1438

Between:

¶1439

1 . The Sing,areni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by^{its Chairman and} Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills^Hyderabad.

¶1440

The Director^(PA and^{W), The SingareniCollieries Company Limited (SCCL)} Kothagude m, Khammam District.

¶1441

The General Manager^{(Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited^{(SCCL) WelfareWing,Corporate PersonnelDepartment,} Singareni tlhavan Hyderabad,

¶1442

The General Manager, Kothagudem Area.^{The Singareni Collieries Company} Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem area, Bhadradri^{Kothagudem District.}

...APPELLANTS

AND

Talari Ravi Kumar, S/o. Jayaprakash, aged about 63^years, Occ.^Ex-EP Operator, E.C.No. 473172, Mine GKOC, KGM Area,^{Singareni Collieries} Company Limited (SCCL), R/o H. No.2-24, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

¶1447

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1448

...RESPONDENTS

¶1449

l.A. NO:3OF2025

¶1450

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19911 of 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1451

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1452

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1453

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL H€ALTH & FW

¶1454

WRIT APPEAL NOiirL:iz:OiEizo25

¶1455

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.30912 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1456

Between:

¶1457

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1458

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1459

The General Manager (Perconnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1460

4 The General Manager, Ramagundam-1, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

...APPELLANTS

AND

Gosikar Laxmaiah, S/o. Pochaiah, aged about 62 years, Occ. Ex-Conveyor Operalor, EC.No.1454082, Mine. GDK 1 and 3 lncline, Ramagundam-l Area, SCCL, R/o H.No.10-1-16/3, Khammam, Khammam District.

¶1465

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1466

...RESPONOENTS

¶1467

l.A. NO: 3OF 2025

¶1468

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the afiidavit fiied irr support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order date<t 3O.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 30912 of 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1469

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1470

Counsel for thr: Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1471

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDIGAL HEALTH & FW

¶1472

WRIT APPEAL NO: 1182OF 2025

¶1473

Writ Appoal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened Against Order Dated24lO9l2O24 in WP.No.3564 ot 2024 on the file of the High Court.

¶1474

Between:

¶1475

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad

¶1476

The Director^(PA and W), The Singareni^{CollieriesCompany Limited (SCCL)} Kothagude'm, Khammam District.

¶1477

The General Manager^{(Personnel)Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries} Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate^{PersonnelDepartment,} Singareni []havan Hyderabad,

¶1478

The Gene,ral Manager, Ramagundam-l Area, The^{Singareni Collieries} Company t.imited^(SCCL), Ramagundam^{Area, Ramagundam District}

...APPELLANTS

AND

Bathula Nagaraju, S/o. Narayana, E.C.No.1425334 aged about 63^yearsEx EP Operator, Spl. Grade, Ramagundam-l Area, Mine, MOCP^Singareni Collieries Company Limited SCCL Rl/o Q.No.SC2-53, Sharadanagar Godavarikhani, Ramagundam District.

¶1483

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1484

...RESPONDENTS

¶1485

l.A. NO:3OF 2025

¶1486

Petition under Section 151 CPC prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 24.09.2O24^passed in Writ Petition No. 3564 ot 2O24 in the interest of^justice.

¶1487

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1488

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1489

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1490

WRIT APPEAL NO: {3iO*CiF 5

¶1491

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal Preferred against Order dated 3010812024 in WP.No.20316 of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1492

Between:

¶1493

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1494

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1495

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate^personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1496

a lhe Genelal Manager, Yellandu Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Yellandu Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

...APPELLANTS

ANO

Lamberdi Ramdas, S/o. Bhaw singh, aged about 65 years Occ Ex-Lineman Mine 2:1 lncline Yellandu Area SCCL R/o Q.No.SD19 Bhagyanagar Thanda Post Singareni Mandal Khammam District

¶1501

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1502

.,.RESPONDENTS

¶1503

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶1504

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30/08/2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20316 of 2023 in the interest ofjustice.

¶1505

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1506

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRt L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1507

Counsel for the,Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1508

iffiiTiippeAL No: 1311oF zozs

¶1509

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preffered against the Order Dated 30{8-2024 in W.P.No.2O229 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Court.

¶1510

Between:

¶1511

The Singareni Collieries Company limited, Rep by its Chairman^{and Managing} Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1512

The Direct,rr^(PA and^{W), The Singareni Collieries Company limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam^District

¶1513

The General^{Manager (Personnel),Welfare and CSR' The Singareni} Collieries^rlompany Limited^{(SCCL) Welfare Wing,CorporatePersonnel} Department, Singareni Bhavan^Hyderabad,

¶1514

The General Manager,^{Yellandu Area,TheSingareni Collieries Company} Limited (SC:CL), Yellandu^{Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.}

...APPELLANTS

AND

Gundala Chandram, S/o. Mallaiah, aged about 63^years, Occ Ex-Sr. Mining Sirdar, E.C.No. 0504575, Mine 21 Incline, Yellandu Area, SCCL R/o. H. No.41-14311 , Basti No. 15, Yellandu Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1519

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1520

RESPONDENTS

¶1521

l.A. NO: 3OF 2025

¶1522

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 3O.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 20229 of 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1523

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. GOUNSEL, REP. SRI P HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDOY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1524

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1525

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1526

APPEAL NO: 1312

¶1527

Writ Appeal under clause^'l 5 of the Letters Patent prefened against the order dated 30/08/2024 in Writ Petition No.20054 ot 2O23 on the file of the High Court.

¶1528

Between:

¶1529

The Singareni Collieries Company Limlted, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan Red Hills Hyderabad.

¶1530

The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1531

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan Hyderabad,

¶1532

a ]he General Manager, Yellandu Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Yeltandu Area,Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

PELLANTS

AND

Payam Sooraiah, S/o.Ramaiah, aged about 65 years, Occ. Ex - Roof Bolting Stitche 21 lncline Yellandu Area SCCL Rr/o H.No. 20-49, Balaji Nagar, Yellanclu, Khammam District

¶1537

The Mr;dical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmaia. Nagar Secunderabad Telangana

¶1538

.RESPONDENTS

¶1539

Petition under Section I 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order datecl 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 20054 of 2O23 in the interest of^justice.

¶1540

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1541

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1542

Counsel for ther Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1543

EAL NO: 1413 OF

¶1544

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 30.08.202.1 in Writ Petition No. 20256 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1545

The Singrrreni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶1546

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni^{Collieries Company Limited (SCCL)} Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1547

The General Manager^{(Personnel) Welfareand CSR, The Singareni Collieries} Company^{t-imited (SCCL)} Welfare^{Wing, Corporate PersonnelDepartment,} Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad,

¶1548

The General Manager, The Singareni^{Collieries CompanyLimited (SCCL),} Ramagundam-lll Area, District. Peddapalli

¶1549

AND

¶1550

¶1551

Hazam Ramdas, S/o. Hazam Bhadru aged about 65^years, Occ.^Ex-General Mazdoor, Ramagundam-3 Area, SCCL Fl/o. H.No.3-101,^Bhagyanagar Thanda, Usirikayalapalle, Khammam District.

¶1552

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmaia. Nagar Secunderabad Telangana

¶1553

...RESPONDENTS

¶1554

l.A. NO: 3OF 2025

¶1555

Petition under Section 151 CPC prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024^passed in Writ Petition No. 20256 ot 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1556

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. AODL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1557

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1558

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1559

Wnir appeAL No: 1414oF 2o2s

¶1560

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent prefened against Order Dated 30/08/2024 in WP.No.19638 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1561

Between:

¶1562

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶1563

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1564

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad,

¶1565

4 Lf," C9l9!"1 Manager, Mandamani Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Ramagundam Area, karimnagar District

AND

...APPELLANTS

Teejavati Hatiram, S/o Bikkiya, aged about 65 years, Occ Ex-Coal Cutter GDK10 lncline Ramagundam-3 Area, SCCL Rl/o H No 6-'t8 Mekata Thanda Ramar]undam mandal Khammam District

¶1570

The Mredical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmerrao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1571

...RESPONDENTS

¶1572

l.A. NO: 3OF 2025

¶1573

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the amdavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to suspend the order datel 3OlO8l2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 19638 of 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1574

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.IUADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1575

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT R^AMAN

¶1576

Counset forthei Respondent No.2: cP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1577

WR|Th?FEnf,Ti6iiIrs oF 2025

¶1578

Writ Appenl under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal Prefened against the order dated 1W0812024 in WP No 1942O of 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1579

Between:

¶1580

The Sing;areni Collieries Company Limited,^{Rep by its Chairman and} Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan^{Red Hills Hyderabad}

¶1581

The Director^(PA and^{W), TheSingarenicollieries companyLimited (sccL)} Kothagudem, Khammam^District

¶1582

The General Manager^{(Personnel)welfareand cSR, The Singarenicollieries} Company r-imited^{(SCCL)Welfare Wing' Corporate PersonnelDepartment,} Singareni Elhavan Hyderabad,

¶1583

The General Manager,^{BellampalliArea The Singareni CollieriesCompany} Limited^(SCCL), Ramagundam^{Area, Karimnagar District.}

...APPELLANTS

AND

1 . Mamidi Mallaiah, S/o Lingaiah, aged about 62^{years, Occ Ex-General} Mazdoor, Ramagundam-3 Area, Mine OCP-1 SCCL R/o H.No. 7-5-318,^GM Colony GM-Geleny, GodavariKhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District

¶1588

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana

¶1589

...RESPONDENTS

¶1590

l.A. NO:3OF2025

¶1591

Petltion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 19420 ot 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1592

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SR! P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FORSCCL/ SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. AOVOCATE GENERAL

¶1593

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRICH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1594

Gounsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1595

WRlr AppeAL No: 1448 oF zozs

¶1596

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent^prefened against the order dated 30.08.2024 in Writ Petition No.20471 ot 2023, on the file of the High Court.

¶1597

Between

¶1598

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad..

¶1599

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1600

The General Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad,

¶1601

The General Manager Ramagundam Area-llt, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam - 3 Area, Peddapalli District.

...APPELLANTS

AND

Madap,a Ella Reddy, S/o. Narasimha Reddy, aged about 63 years, Occ. ExCoal^()utter, E.C.No.1150387, Mine . GDK-10 lncline, SCCL, Rl/o. H.No. Q.No.!195, Block -29, Pothana Colony, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District.

¶1606

The M,gdical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad Telangana

¶1607

...RESPONDENTS

¶1608

!.A. NO: 3 OF 2025

¶1609

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order date(l 30.O8.2O24 passed in Writ Petition No. 20471 of 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1610

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1611

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRICH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1612

Counsel for the, Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDTCAL HEALTH & FW

¶1613

wRrr APPEAU Il6iX ii6ii,UF,2ozs

¶1614

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened against Order Dated 30-08-2024 in WP.No.2O692 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1615

Between:

¶1616

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶1617

The Directrr (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1618

The Gener,al Manager (Personnel) Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company l-imited (SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Eihavan, Hyderabad,

¶1619

The General Manager, Ramagundam-lll Area The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam-3 Area, Peddapalli District.

...APPELLANTS

AND

Khatam Shankaraiah, S/o. Rayalingu, aged about 63^years, Occ:^ExGeneral Mazdoor, E.C.No.1450452, Mine: CHP GDK OCP-|, Ramagundam-3 Area, Fl/o. H.No.6-86/6, Pannur, Centenary Colony, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District.

¶1624

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmarao Nagar Secunderabad.

¶1625

STIONEI=NIS

¶1626

.A. NO:3OF2025

¶1627

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the order dated 3O.O8.2O24^passed in Writ Petition No. 20692 ol 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1628

Gounsel forthe Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REP. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SRI S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. GP, attached to the O/o. ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1629

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANOER, Sr. GOUNSEL, REP. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1630

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

¶1631

EA 7:F

¶1632

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Prefened Against the Order Dated 30/08/2024 in W.P.No.3O783 ot 2023 on the file of the High Court.

¶1633

Between:

¶1634

1 . The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep by its Chairman and , Managing Director, Singareni^{Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad.}

¶1635

The Director (PA and W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Kothagudem, Khammam District.

¶1636

The General Manager^(Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL) Welfare Wing, Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad,

¶1637

The General Manager, Ramagundam- lll Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited^(SCCL), Peddapalli District.

¶1638

EIIIj]

¶1639

¶1640

B.R.W'illiam Moses, S/o B.J.Roberts, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Ex-EP Operator, EC.No.4053039, Mine. GDK-OCP-|, Ramagundam-3 Area, Singareni Collieries Company Limted (SCCL), R/o. H.No.204, Mallaram, P.V.Colony, Khammam District.

¶1641

The Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, Rep by its Superintendent, Padmerrao Nagar Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1642

...RESPONDENTS

¶1643

Petition lnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order date,l 30.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 30783 of 2023 in the interest of^justice.

¶1644

Counsel for ttre Appellants: SRI E.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI P.SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL / SR! S.RAHUL REDDY, SPL. cP, attached to the O/o. ADDL, ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶1645

Counsel for the Respondent No.l: SRI L.RAVICHANDER, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

¶1646

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW The Court de,livered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT

¶1647

IIT TIIE HIGII OOIIRT FOR THE STATE OF TEIANGAI'IA AT IITDERABAI)

¶1648

THE HON'BI.E TTIE CHIEF JT'STICE SRI APARESH I{IIMAR SINGTI

¶1649

THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE G.M,MOHIUDDIN

¶1650

I'^IlIrarrfrs[fa IIos.39- 6- 2A2307 Fnr, 310- 31131 2- 37.3- 469 47o. 475- 476- 4 444- 4aa 449- 49o. 491. 492- 495^ 6L4620. 621- 622637 641 642- 646- 647 676 641 711.712- 713.7L4.715.7L6- 7t7. 72A. 736. 737. 73a.743. 75,6- 467- 772.7A3. a94. a95- 897. 898. 926.927. 928.93o 1163154. 1165. 1167. 1168. 11 69. tl7t. tt72.1182. 131()- 13 l. lsl2. 1413. 1414. 1415. 144a- 1504 and 15O6

¶1651

¶1652

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

¶1653

.Appellants

¶1654

Madurakavi Kistaiah and another.

¶1655

TI,

¶1656

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

¶1657

.Appellants

¶1658

Konda Ramulu and another.

¶1659

¶1660

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

¶1661

....Ap ts

¶1662

Pendyala Rayamallu and another.

¶1663

¶1664

¶1665

W.A.IIo.3O7 of 2o25 Between:

¶1666

The Singareni Collieries CompanyLimited and 3others. ts
ts Janne pochaiah and another.
W.A.No.3O9of2o25
Betweert:
TheSing.arerriCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. .Appellants
MekalaFlajeswarRaoand another.
VI.A.No.SI1Oof2O2S
Between:
The Singareni Collieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants
KolkiponggChinniand another. Respondents
SI.A.No.3L1of 2o25
Between:
The Singareni Collieries CompanyLimited and3 others.
....Ap ts
GumasaShankar andanother. ....Respondents
W.A.No.312of2O2S
Between:
The Singareni Collieries CompanyLimited^{and3 others.}
ImmidichettyChandraiah^{and another.} .Respondents
w.A-No.31:30l2o25
Between:
TheSingar<:niCollieries^{CompanyLimited and3 others'} ....Appellants
YasamShenkaraiah and another.

¶1667

¶1668

W.A.No.459 of 2O2S

¶1669

TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimited and3others. .Appellants
KalavalaLachaiah and another. ts
iTt
TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimitedand3others. .Appellants
Doddilla Madanaiah and another.
FII
TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimitedand3 others.
ts
DongalaMallaiah and another. Respondents
iTt
TheSingareni Collieries Company Limitedand3 others.
....Appellants
G.Kanakaiah and another.
Respondents
W.A.No.479ot2025
TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimitedand3others. .Appellants
G.Sadashivam andanother.
Respondents
w
TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimitedand3 others. .Appellants
And
MamidiRajaiahand another.
.Respondents

¶1670

¶1671

SI.A.No.488 of 2025 Between: The Sinl;areni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

¶1672

....Appellants

¶1673

And

¶1674

PonnamRayamalluandanother. ....Respondents
W.A.No.489ol2o25
Between:
TheSingareniCoilieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants Ard Namasani Narsaiah andanother. ....Respondents
W.A.Ito.49Oof2o25
Between:
TheSingareniCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
Paranand:.Ramaiahandanother. ....Respondents
trI.A.No.4lll of2O2S
Between:
TheSingareniCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
Atla Mallaiahand another. ....Respondents
\tr.A.No.492of 2025
Between:
TheSingarr:ni Collieries Company^{Limited and3 others.} ....Appellants And
GanduPosl-ramalluand^another. ....Respondents
trI.A.No.49!iol2o25
Between:
TheSingareniCollieries^{CompanyLimited and3 others.} ....Appellaats And
Vemulawad.lLaxman^andanother. ....Respondents

¶1675

¶1676

[r.A.IYo.614 of 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Sri Devasani Sailu and another. ....Respondents W.A.No.52O of 2ol25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Kanthala Mohan Reddy and another. ....Respondents W.A.No.62L of 2o.25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Byram Mallaiah and another. ....Respondents W.A.No.622 of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Pittala Rajaiah and another. ....Respondents W.A.No.633 of 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Sadala Pentaiah and another. '. "'Respondents w.A.No.63? of 2o2s Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Late Boina Kanakaiah and another. ....Respondents

....Respondents

....Respondents

W.A.No.64l of 2o25 Between:

¶1681

The Sin;gareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

¶1682

....Appellants

¶1683

And

¶1684

Mogili Rajamallu and another. ....Respondeats
W.A.No.642of 2o25
Betweerr:
The SingareniCollieriesCompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
Suramall.aRatnaiah andanother. ....Respondents
W.A.No.646of 2o25
Betseen:
The Sing.rreni Collieries CompanyLimited andanother.. ....Appellants And
ThotlaJayanna and another. ....Respondents
Itr.A.IIo.647of 2o25
Between:
The Singareni Collieries CompanyLimited and3others. ....Appellaats And
Nannavenir Saraiahandanother. ....Respondents
W.A.No.648of 2o25
Between:
The Singareni Collieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
EmbadiLirrgaiahand another. ....Respoadeats
w.A.No.65:30f 2025
Between:
The Singart:niCollieries^{CompanyLimited and3 others.} ....Appellants And
Chekka Lingaiah^{and another.} ....Respondents

¶1685

¶1686

W.A.No.664 of 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants

¶1687

And

¶1688

Maraboina Komuraiah and another. ....Respondents W.A.No.666 of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Kummari Kistaiah and another. ....Respondents W.A.No.672 of 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Rontala Gangaram and another. ....Respondents W.A.No.675 of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Ch. Rajaiah and another. ....Respondents W.A.No.676 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Chintakindi Sheshagiri and another. ....Respondeats IlI.A.No.681 of 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Palle Rajaiah and another. ....Respondents

....Respondents

....Respondents

W.A.Ito,686 of 2o25

Betweeo:

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants

¶1695

And

¶1696

GotteRzrjaiahand another. ....Respondents
7of2o25 ar,l
Betseetr:
TheSingareniCollieries CompanyLimitedand 3 others. ....Appellants And
Suramal.a Chinnaiahandanother. ....Respondents
If.A.I{o.7O6of 2o25
Between:
TheSingareniCollieries CompanyLimitedand 3 others. ....Appellaats And
AnkarnSammaiahand another. ....Respondents
W.A.No.7O9of2o.25
Betweea:
TtreSingareniCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellaats And
NagunuriSaraiahandanother. ....Respondents
W.A.!Io.71.1of 2o25
Between:
TheSingareniCollieries CompanyLimitedand 3 others. ....Appellants And
Gunti Iylaiahand another. ....Respondelts
W.A.No.712of 2o25
Betweea:
TheSingan:niCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellarts And
MutyamDt:vaiahandanother. ....Respondents

¶1697

¶1698

W.A.No.713of2ol25
Between:
TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimitedand 3others. ....Appellants And
SagaMallaiah and another. ..;.Respondents
W.A.No.714of2O2S
Between:
TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
ChippakurthiMallaiah andanother. ....Respondents
W.A.No.715of2O25
Between:
TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimitedand3 others. ....Appellants
And
BommaGuruvaiah and another. ....Respondents
IlI.A.No.716of2O25
Between:
TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimited and 3others. ....Appellants And
MinumulaRamchanderand another. ....Respondents
W.A.No.7l7of2o25
Between:
TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimitedand3 others. ....Appellants And
MadineniPoshamandanother. "'Respondents
w.A.No.z2gof2o25
Between:
TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants
And
KatlaRajaiahand another.
....Respondents

¶1699

..;.Respondents

¶1700

¶1701

W.A.No,,736 of 2o25 Between:

¶1702

The Sinl;areni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

¶1703

....Appellants

¶1704

And

¶1705

Md.Vazeerandanother. ....Respondents
W.A.No.'737of 2o25
Betweetr:
TheSingareniCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
DurgamGangaram andanother. ....Respondents
W.A.No.7'38of 2o25
Betweenr
TheSing:reniCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
OtlaJeevaRatnamand another. ....Respondents
W.A.No.7,43of2o25
Betweea:
TheSingareniCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
Shaik GulamRasooland another. ....Respondeats
trr.A.No.756of 2o25
Between:
TheSingareniCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
KarengulaRajaiahandanother. ....Respondents
Itr.A.No.7S7of2O25
Between:
The Singarr:ni CollieriesCompany^{Limited and3 others.} ....Appellants And
LiyakathAliKhanand another. ...,Respondents

¶1706

¶1707

W.A.No.772 of 2o25 Between:

¶1708

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellaats

¶1709

And

¶1710

Ellavelli Sat5ranarayana and another. ....Respondents W.A.IIo.783 of 2o.25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Kandula Venkatanarayana and another. ....Re3ponderts W.A.No.894 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Pudery Shanker and another. ....Respondents W.A.I{o.895 of 2o25 Betseen: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Gopi Nagabhushanam and another. ....Respondents W.A.IIo.897 of 2O2S Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Manga Sagranarayana and another. ....Respoadents \tr A.ilo.a9a of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Komaragiri Ananthaiah and another.

¶1711

....Respondents

¶1712

....Appellants And ....Respondents

¶1713

....Respondents

¶1714

¶1715

trI.A.No.926 of 2o25 Between:

¶1716

The Sin.gareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

¶1717

....Appellants

¶1718

And

¶1719

VerukondaSatyanarayanaand another. ....Respondents
rv.A.I{o.927of2O2S
Betweerr:
TheSing',areniCollieries CompanyLimitedand 3 others. ....Appellants And
KampallvDurgaiah and another. ....Respondents
W.A.Ito.928of2o25
Between:
TheSingrreniCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
Dunde Re{aiahand another. ....Respondents
trI.A.No.93Oof2o25
Between:
TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
MadipojuSreenuand another. ....Respondents
W.A.I{o.11.63of2o25
Between:
TheSingareni CollieriesCompanyLimitedand 3 others. ....Appellants And
Adepu Rajt:shamand another. ....Respondents
W.A.No.11 E
Bctwcen:
TheSingart:niCollieries^{CompanyLimited and3 others'} ....Appellants And
Basaboina.Rayalingu^andanother. ....Respondents

¶1720

¶1721

W.A.trto.1165 of 2o25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

¶1722

....Appellants

¶1723

And

¶1724

Devasani Krishna and another. ....Respondeats W.A.No.1167 of 2o25 Betweetr: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Marikilla Kanakaiah and another.

¶1725

....Respondeats

¶1726

....Respondents

¶1727

W.A.!to.1168 of 2o25 Behreer: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Kekerl,a Veerasham and another. ....Respondeats W.A.Ifo.1169 ol 2o25 Betseelr: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Syed Isaque and another. ....Respondeats W.A.!to.l171 ol 2O25 Between: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Talari Ravi Kumar and another. ....Respondeats W.A.No.1172 of 2O2S Betsee!: The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. ....Appellants And Gosika Laxmaiah and another. ...,Respondents

¶1728

¶1729

W.A.No,,1182 of 2o25 Betrree:o:

¶1730

The Sinl;areni Collieries Company Limited and 2 others.

¶1731

....Appellants

¶1732

And

¶1733

BathulaNagarajuandanottrer. ....Respondents
W.A.No.131Oof 2o25
Betweerr:
TheSingareniCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And LambadiRamdas andanother. ....Respondents
[I.A.l(o.1311 of2o25
Betqreen::
TheSing:treniCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
Gundala^tlhandramand another. ....Respondents W.A.No.1:312of 2o25
Between:
TheSingareniCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
PayamSooraiah andanother. ....Respondents
W.A.No.14.13of2025
Between:
TheSingareniCollieries CompanyLimited and3 others. ....Appellants And
HazamRarndasandanother. ....Respondents
W.A.No.14L4of 2o25
Between:
TheSingart:niCollieries Company^{Limited and3 others.} ....Appellants Ard
Teejavathi[{atiramand another. ....Respondents

¶1734

....Respondents

¶1735

¶1736

W.A.No.1415 of 2o25 Between:

¶1737

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

¶1738

....Appellants

¶1739

And

¶1740

Mamidi Mallaiah and another.

....Respondents

W.A.No.1448 of 2O2S

Between:

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

¶1745

Ard

¶1746

....Appellants

¶1747

Madapa Ella Reddy and another.

....Respondents

W.A.Ito.lSO4 ot2o25

Between:

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

¶1752

....Appellaats

¶1753

And

¶1754

Khatam Shankaraiah and another.

¶1755

....Respondents

¶1756

trI.A.lIo.1 ol2o25 Bctweer:

¶1757

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others.

¶1758

....Appellants

¶1759

And

¶1760

B.R.William Moses and another.

¶1761

....Respondents

¶1762

COMMON JI'I'GiMENT

¶1763

Since the issues that arise in the above writ appeals are integrally one and the same, the writ appeals are being disposed of by this Commbn Judgment.

¶1764

These Writ Appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 30.08.2024 passed in W.p.No. t8922 of 2023 and, batch by the learned Single Judge, wherein the learned Single Judge has directed reconsideration of the medical categorization of the writ petitioners under Clause 9.4.O of the National Coal Wage

¶1765

¶1766

Agreemr:nt-Vl (NCWA-VI), by referring the matter back to Gandhi Medical Hospital, Secunderabad.

¶1767

Hr:ard Sri E.Madan Mohan Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri P.Sri Harsha Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Singareni Collieries Company Limited, and Sri S.Rahul Reddy, learned llpecial Government Pleader attached to the office of the learned A.dditional Advocate General, appearing for the appellants; Sri L.Ravichander, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Ch.Venkat Raman, learned counsel for the respondent/writ petitioner in W.A.No.4O of 2025 and batch except in W.A.No.39 of 2025; Sri P.S.Rajasekhar, learned counsel representing Sri Ch.Ve.:kat Raman, learned counsel for the respondents/writ petitioners in W.A.No.39 of 2025 and perused the record.

¶1768

Factual matrix (in brief)

¶1769

The respondents herein are workmen of the Singareni Collieries Company Limited^{(SCCL), a Government Company under} the admini:;trative control^{of the Ministry of Coal, Governmentof} India. During the^{course of thek long service in miningoperations,} both underground and^{surface, these workmenwere declared} medically unfit on^{account of various ailments and disabilities.} consequent upon such^{medicalinvalidation, they soughtthe} benefit of dependent^{employment under C1ause 9-4-O of NCWA-VI'}

¶1770

¶1771

The NCWA-VI, a bipartite settlement binding under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Acl, 1947 (for short '1947 Act), provides under Clause 9.4.O for emplo5rment to one dependent of a worker who is permanently disabled in his place. The clause draws a distinction between:

¶1772

i) permanent disablement arising from injury or disease resulting in loss of emplo5rment; and

¶1773

ii) disablement arising out of "general physical debility," subject to the condition that the employee is up to 58 years of age.

¶1774

The controversy centers around the categorization of the respondents under Clause 9.a.0(i) or Clause 9.4.0(ii). The respondents contend that their medical conditions constitute permanent disabilities falling under Clause 9.4.0(i), thereby entitling their dependents to employment irrespective of age or residual service. Ttre appellant-Company, on the other hand, categorized the majority of the employees under Clause 9.4.O(ii), treating their condifions as cases of "general physical debility." Since most of them were above 58 years of age or had less than two years of residual service, they were offered monetary compensation in lieu of dependent emplo5rment.

¶1775

¶1776

Earlier .Round of Litieation

¶1777

In W.P.No.44l7O of 2016 and batch, by order dated 30.O7.2019, this Court directed the appellant-Company to forward the meclical invalidation certificates to the competent Medical Board fcr re-assessment and categorization under Clause 9.4.O(i) or (ii).

¶1778

Pursuant thereto, the Corporate Medical Board (CMB) of SCCL reassessed the cases and placed all the employees under Clause 9.4.0(ii). Notably, none of the employees was categorized under Cle.use 9.4.O(i).

¶1779

Cha.llenging such uniform categorization, 127 employees approachr:d this Court in W.P.No.261L of 2O2O and batch. By order dated 07. 12.2021, the learned Single Judge directed reference of the cases to an independent Medical Board at Gandhi Medical Hospital, liecunderabad, observing that the fact that not even a single employee was^placed under Clause (i) raised^legitimate doubt.

¶1780

lO. The appellant-Company^{carried the matter} :^inappealin W.A.No.38tr of 2022. By^{judgmentdated 13-09.2022,the Division} Bench affirmed the order directing^{independentmedical} assessment.

¶1781

¶1782

[n compliance, Gandhi Medical Hospital constituted an independent Medical Board, comprising specialists from various disciplines. The Board examined the cases of 127 employees and submitted its proceedings dated o3.o7.2o23. wherein, out of L2T cases, only six employees were categonz.ed under Clause 9.4.O(i), while the remaining 121 were placed under Clause 9.4.O(ii).

¶1783

Aggrieved by such categoriz,ation, 103 employees filed fresh writ petitions, leading to the impugned common order dated 3O.O8.2O24. The learned Single Judge, upon examining certain individual cases, including that of a petitioner who had suffered amputation of the right leg above knee level and had been certified with 94%o disability, formed. the view that cases involving clear and "permanent disabilit5/ ought not to have been categorized as "general physical debility." The matter was accordingly remitted once again to Gandhi Medical Hospital for re-visiting the categorization.

¶1784

Subsequent developments during pendencv of appeals

¶1785

Para 9.4.o of NCWA-vI, which is relevant for consideration, is extracted hereunder:

¶1786

'9.4.o Employment to one dependant of a worker who is perrnanently disabled in his place

¶1787

(i) The disablement of the worker concerned should arise from injury or disease, be of a permanent nature resurting into loss of employment and it should be so certified by the"coal Company concerned.

¶1788

¶1789

(i::) In case of disablement arising out of general physical d,:bility so certified by the Coal Company, the employee concerned will be eligible for the benefit under this clause if hc/she is up to the age of 58 years.

¶1790

The term 'general physical debility' would mean de ficiency of a workman due to any disease or other health re,rson leading to his/her disablement to perform his/her du.ties regularly and/or efliciently.

¶1791

(iiil The dependent for this purpose mearls the wife/ husbanci as the case may be unmarried daughter, son anci legally adopted son. If no such direct dependent is available for employment, brother, widowed daughter/widowed daughterin-taw or son-in-law residing with the employee and almost whclly dependent on the earning of the employee may be corrsideredIn so far as female dependants are concemed, their employment would be governed by the provisions of clause 9.5 0.

¶1792

(iv) The dependants to be considered for employment should be physically fit and suitable for emplo5rment and aged more than 35 years provided that in the age limit in case of employment of female spouse is concemed, there would be no age limit regarding provision of employment."

¶1793

During the pendency of the present writ appeals, this Court noticed thirt under clause 9.4.O of NCWA-VI extracted hereinabove, the certili<:ation whether an employee falls under^{clause(i) or} clause (ii) cf^{para 9.4.0} of^{NCWA-VIhas to be made by the Coal} Company concerned.^{However,instead ofCoal Company} undertaking the^{exercise on the basisof the assessment conducted} by the independent^{Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital, the} Medical Bo,erd^{had categorizedthe employeesunderClause (i) or} Clause⁽ⁱⁱ⁾ t,f^{Para 9.4.O of NCWA-VI. This was not in consonance} with the settlement^{arrived atbetweenthe managementand} workmen uide^{NCWA-VIunder Section t 8(3) of the Industrial}

¶1794

¶1795

Disputes Act, 1947. This Court, therefore, felt that the same is not in conformit5r with Para 9.4.0 of NCWA-VI for the reason that the task of categorization of an employee for dependent employment on grounds of injury or disease of a permanent nature under Clause (i) or for other benefits such as monetary benefits under Clause (ii) on account of disablement arising out of general physical debility, is to be undertaken by the employer, who is in the best position to undertake such an exercise, instead of an independent Medical Board comprising the experts, who are unconnected with the organization and unaware of the nature of duties and responsibilities to be performed by such employees in the Coal Company. This Court felt that the medical expert can only render an opinion on the disablement of the workmen by injury or disease, or due to general physical debility on the basis of evaluation of their medical condition. They cannot be tasked to categorize any employee under Clause (i) or Clause (ii) of Para 9.4.O of NCWA-VI, as that responsibiligr lies witJ: the employer or the organization. The underlying grievance of tl:e petitioners is based on their categorization by the Medical Board under Ctause (i) or Clause (ii) of Para 9.4.O of NCWA-VI. The writ petitioners did not explicitly question the assessment or opinion given by the Medical Board as to their general physical debility or injury or disease. The question whether such disabilit5r is of pernzrnent nature, which would bring them under Clause (i) or Clause (ii) of para 9.4.O in

¶1796

¶1797

NCwA-r/I is an exercise to be undertaken by the Coal Company as specifically mandated in the settlement between the management and the workmen. The circulars issued by the Management to undertal<e such exercise by the Corporate Medical Board had undergo:re change in the last ten years. The Court took note of the constitution of the Corporate iVledical Boar<i vide circular dated O7.O4.2O15 and the succeeding Office Memorandum dated 09.03.2O18 as those would be material for issuance of appropriate direction upon the Coal Company to undertake the task of categorizettion. Taking into note the constitution of the Corporate Medical Eloard in the aforesaid circulars, this Court directed the appellant company to constitute a Corporate Medical Board comprisin,g members of the Personnel Department i.e., an offrcer from Minirrg Discipline, not below the rank of General Manager, to be nominrrted by Director (P,A&W); an ofhcer from Personnel Departmer.t not below the rank of General Manager t6 be nominated by Director^{(P,A&w); one officer from MS Department} i.e., General Manager,^{MS; the Chief MedicalOfficer and one or two} spicialists to^{be nominated by the Director(P,A&W) in the same} manner as in^{the Circular datedO7.O4.2O 15' TheCoalCompany} had not expressed^{any objectionto constitute a more broadbased} committee lbr^{carryingout this exercise' This Court directed that} the cases ol'all^{the writ petitioners for categorisationunderclause} (i) or clause {ii} of para 9-4.0^{be considered by the above committee}

¶1798

¶1799

on the basis of the opinion rendered by the independent Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital vide its Report dated28.Ol.2023 within a stipulated period.

¶1800

In compliance, the Medical Board conducted detailed proceedings on 27.01.2026, 2a.OL.2O26 and 31.O1.2O26, and submitted its consolidated report under Memo dated. 04.02.2O26. The said Memo reflects individual assessment of each employee with reference to the nature of ailment, percentage of disability (where assessed), and the resultant incapacit5r.

¶1801

The material placed before this Court, particularly the proceedings culminating in the Memo dated 04.02.2O26, indicates that while a substantial number of cases pertain to generalized age-related debility and multi-system decline, certain employees suffer from grave, identiliable, and permanent disabilities, such as amputation, severe neurological deficits, loss of vision, advanced cardiomyopathy, chronic renal failure requiring dialysis, and seizure disorders with structural brain patholosl wlaicle, prima facie,^{appear to fall withinthe ambit of Clause 9.4.0(i).}

¶1802

It is in this backdrop that the present appeals are required to be adjudicated, balancing the sanctity of expert medical opinion with the statutory obligation to correctly apply the distinction embedded in Clause 9.4.O of NCWA-VI, particularly in cases where the seriousness and permanence of disability are evident on record.

¶1803

¶1804

Submissions on behalf of the Appellants (SCCLI

¶1805

k:arned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellantCompany, advanced elaborate submissions assailing the impugned order dated 3O.O8.2O24 as under:

¶1806

i) That the appellant is strictly governed by the provisions of tht: NCWA-VI and the implementation guidelines issued by the, Joint Bipartite Committee for Coal Industry (JBCCI) and Coal India Limited. Being a signatory to the bipartite setliement under Section f 2(3) of the 1947 Act, the Company is tround to implement Clause 9.4.0 in its true letter and spirit and cannot travel beyond its express stipulations.

¶1807

ii) That under Clause 9.4.0(ii), the benefit of dependent emplo5rment is available only if the employee is 'upto the age of 58 years." Admittedly, the respondents had crossed 58 years of age at the time of their medical examination. Thus, even assuming medical invalidation, they are ineligible for depe:rdent employment.

¶1808

iii) That employees with^{less than 24 monthsof residual service} are rrot entitled to^{dependent employment but maybe} granted lump sum compensation^{of Rs-5,0O,000/-or wages} for the balance^{period, whichever is less.}

¶1809

¶1810

M^{That most of the respondents had less than two years of} senrice remaining at the time of medical invalidation. The Company, on humanitarian considerations, extended monetary benefits, though not mandatorily required under NCWA. Having accepted terminal benefits, the respondents cannot now claim dependent emplo5rment as of right.

¶1811

v) That the cases of the respondents have undergone three rounds of medical scrutiny:

¶1812

a) By the CMB of SCCL (consisting of CMO and specialist doctors), which declared them unfit and pl,aced them under Clause (ii).

¶1813

bf Pursuant to this Court's order dated 3O.O7.2O 19 in W.P.No.44170 of 2016 and batch, the CMB reexamined and again placed them under Clause (ii).

¶1814

c) Pursuant to this Court's order dated O7.L2,2O2L in W.P.No.2611 of 2O2O and batch, the independent

¶1815

' Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital (15 specialist doctors) examined and placed l2l otut of 127 under Clause (ii).

¶1816

vi) That the independent Board at Gandhi Medical Hospital comprised l5 specialists from various disciplines and categorized l2l out of l2Z employees under Clause 9.4.0(ii). After three expert evaluations, the matter ought to attain Iinality.

¶1817

¶1818

vii) That Clause (i) applies only where disablement arises from a speciflc injury or disease of a permanent nature resulting in toial loss of emplo5rment. Clause (ii) applies to disablement ar:.sing out of "general physical debility."

¶1819

viii) That though Madurakavi Kistaiah, had suffered amputation, thr: Medical Board opined that he could be considered for surface duties. Therefore, it was not a case of absolute um:mployability attracting Clause (i).

¶1820

ix) That compassionate or dependent employment is not a mal:ter of right. Prescription of age limits and eligibility criteria is within the policy domain and cannot be diluted merely because marginal hardship is caused.

¶1821

x) That: all respondents have since retired upon attaining supe rannuation and their terminal benefits have been settk:d. Grant of dependent employment at this^{stage would} distu rb recruitment planning and^{prejudiceeligible} cand:idates in the oPen^market.

¶1822

xi) That categorization^{underClause 9'4'0(0or (ii) is essentially} a medical^{question. The Court ought not to substitute its} own opinion for that^{of an expertMedicalBoard, particularly} one constituted^{pursuantto judicialdirection'}

¶1823

¶1824

xii) That repeated challenges to medical categorization would lead to unending litigation. The impugned order, directing yet another re-visit, is unsustainable in law and liable to be set aside.

¶1825

Submlssioas on behalf of respondent ![o.1 (workmenf

¶1826

Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.l, supported

¶1827

the impugned order and advanced the submissions as under:

¶1828

i) That NCWA-VI is a welfare-oriented bipartite settlement intended to provide social security to coal mine workers engaged in hazardous employment. Its provisions must receive a liberal and purposive interpretation.

¶1829

ii) That the entire controversy stems from a fundamental conflation of the terms "debility" and "disabilit5r." Drawing upon accepted medical understanding, he submitted that the two expressions are conceptually and clinically distinct. According to him:

¶1830

a) Debility denotes a generalized state of weakness or decline in physical or mental health, often age-related, gradual, and in certain cases manageable or reversible. It reflects a condition of diminished strength rather than a specific structural or functional impairment.

¶1831

¶1832

b) Disability, on the other hand, signifies a specific and identifiable impairment resulting from injury or disease, which substantially restricts an individual's ability to perform major life or occupational activities. Such disability is ordinaril.y permanent in character and traceable to a defined pathoiogicai cause.

¶1833

It vras thus urged that permanent, disease-specific or injuryspecific impairments cannot be subsumed under the generic expression "general physical debility."

¶1834

iii) That the cases involving amputation, stroke with neurological deficit, seizure disorders, severe cardiac disease, chronic renal failure, loss of vision, and orthopaedic incapacities are instances of permanent disability arising from disease/injury and squarely fall under Clause 9.4.0(i).

¶1835

iv) That Clause (i) does not prescribe any age restriction. Once a case falls within Clause (i), the age of the employee or leftover seryi,:e becomes wholly irrelevant.

¶1836

v) With specific reference to the petitioner^{who suffered} amptttation of the right leg above knee^[eve[ and^{was certified} with 94o/o perna.nent disability, it was argued that categtrizing such a case under "general^{physical debility"} defies logic and medical science; that if such a case does not

¶1837

¶1838

fall under Clause (i), the very object of the provision stands defeated.

¶1839

vi) That initially aJl 127 cases were placed under Clause (ii) by the Corporate Medical Board, and even the independent Board categofized l2L under Clause (ii). Given the varied nature of ailments, such uniformity raises legitimate doubt as to individualizrd assessment.

¶1840

vii) By referring to information obtained under the Right to Information Act, it was contended that:

¶1841

i) Clear parameters distinguishing Clause (i) and (ii) were not disclosed;

¶1842

ii) Certain members of the Board had previously been associated with SCCL as panel doctors;

¶1843

ul) The responses were evasive.

¶1844

viiil That the impugned direction for re-visit is justified in order to ensure a fair and reasoned medical assessment.

¶1845

ix) That despite repeated^judicial directions (orders dated 3O.O7.2O19, 07.12.2021 and subsequent proceedings), the appellant has consistently resisted granting dependent emplo5rment, necessitating continued litigation.

¶1846

x) That arbitrar5r categorization violates Articles 14, 16 ar.d 2L of the Constitution of India. Denial of dependent employment

¶1847

¶1848

irr cases of grave and permanent disability defeats the social st:curity intent under\ring NCWA-VI.

¶1849

L9. We have taken note of the respective submissions urged and the material placed on record, including the proceedings of the Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital dated O3.O7.2O23, as well as the earlier report dated 28.01.2023 referred to in the orders passed in W.A.No.39 of 2025. The report records that L27 employer:s were examined and categorised under Clause (i) or Clause (ii) of Paragraph 9.4.O of NCWA-VI.

¶1850

Consideration by this Court

¶1851

In lhe present case, a careful reading of the report discloses that out of 127 cases, as many as 121 employees were placed under Clause (ii) "disablement arising out of general physical debility" and only 6 were placed under Clause (i) "permanent disableme nt arising from injury or disease". The statistical outcome itself calls for close scrutiny, particularly when the diagnoses recorded include amputation, stroke with hemiparesis, cervical fusion with quadriparesis, glaucoma with optic atrophy, seizure disorders, and other grave conditions.

¶1852

2L. The definition of "general physical debility" in the settlement contempla':es a deficiency of a workma.n due to any disease or other health reason leading to his/her disablement to perform duties reg"rlarly and/or efficiently. The expression "general" is

¶1853

¶1854

significant. It denotes a broad-based state of weakness or infirmit5r, not a specific, measurable, permanent impairment arising from an identifiable patholory.

¶1855

It is to be noted that Clause (i), in contrast, expressly refers to disablement 'arising from injury or disease" and 'being of a perrnanent natrrre." The textual distinction between the two clauses is deliberate. Botl speak of "disablement," but the cause and character of such disablement are distinct. Clause (i) addresses specific, permanent disabilities traceable to a defined. injury or disease; Clause (ii) addresses disablement flowing from generalized debility.

¶1856

In medical jurisprudence, "debility" signifies generalized weakness i.e., asthenia, age-related decline, or systemic diminution of strength which may be managed or ameliorated. "Disability," on the other hand, refers to a defined impairment i.e., orthopaedic, neurological, cardiac, oncological, or ophthalmic, which is measurable, certifiable, and often irreversible.

¶1857

The material extracted from the hospital proceedings demonstrates that some of the employees were suffering from conditions such as:

¶1858

a) Post-traumatic amputation with 94o/o certified disability;

¶1859

b) Stroke (CVA) with hemiparesis and seizure disorder; c) Cervical fusion with quadriparesis;

¶1860

¶1861

d) Glaucomatous optic atrophy causing irreversible visual impairment.

¶1862

Thes;e are not instances of generalized weakness. They are specific, identifiable, permanent disabilities arising from injury or disease. To classify such cases under "general physical debitit5/ is to dilute the textual distinction consciously embedded in Clause (i) and Clau.se (ii).

¶1863

A r;crutiny of the medical opinion rendered by the Gandhi Medical lloard and the opinion of the Committee in the following cases refr:rred to in the Table indicate a complete non-application of mind to the nature of injury or disease which has resulted in disablemr:nt of permanent nature. If workmen suffer from such nature of injury or disease are still categorised under clause 9.4.O (ii), it wouLld amount to perversity and blurring off any distinction between t.:re criteria defined in 9.4.O (i) and (ii) to effectively deny the benefils of the social welfare scheme conceived under 9.4.O of

¶1864

NCWA-VI.

¶1865

s. No.	Name,of Employee	Diagnosis(as recordedf	Findtngsofthe Corporate Uedical Board	Opi	nion
I	Maduraka'ri Kistaiah	Compound fracturewith compartment syndrome; post-traumatic amputation (94o/o disability)	This wasacaseof compoundfracture bothbonesupperone third right leg. Compoundfracture meansextensivesoft tissuedamagewith boneanditsfragments exposed.Patientmight develor:comoartment	After ta conside theinde Medica report 28.01. Gandhi Hospit Commit the opin	kinginto rationof pendent lBoard dated 2023of Medical al, the teeisof ion that

¶1866

¶1867

			sJmdromerightleg. Compartment Syndrome is a conditionthatdevelops duetocomplicationof fractureinwhichthere will be excessive pressurebuildupin muscles resultingin neuro-vascularbundle damagewhichmay causedamageto musclesandbones. Ttris leads to requirement of fasciotomywhich isan emergencysurgery used to relieve pressureinthemuscle compartmentsby incisingfascia.Despite doing fasciotomy,there maybe acondition where vascularity cannotberestoredand necrosismaydevelop. lnsuchcasetheloss maybepermanent in nature.However,this disability can be correctedwith thehelp of prosthesisand patientcanbemade ambulatory.Hence therewasnolossof emplo5rment.	t]:ediseaseof theex-employee wastreatable and not permanentin naturewhich didnot result in loss of employment- Hencecaseis categorized underClause e.4.o(iil.
8	Kekerla Veerasham	14monthsold postOPI3.L4.- L5 pedicle screwandrod fixation,BIL TA Rt.L5 facetectomy with l3-lA lamincectomy andposterior decompression (23.11.2OL71 Gr.IVOAl(nee LeftGr.IIRrght withB/LPFA Cervical Spondylosis.	. He wasoperated withLS-LSpedicle screwand rodfixation, BilateralL4, Rt.L5 facetectomywithL3-L4 Lamincectomyand posterior decompression.This conditionwasalready treated. oGr.IVOsteoArthritis KneeLt. Gr.lIRt.With Bilateral Patello femoral Arthritis, CervicalS5pondylosis -^{thisis anagerelated} degenerative condition can betreatedby	After takinginto consideration of theindependent MedicalBoard report dated 28.OL.2023of GandhiMedical Hospital, the Committeeisof theopinion that thediseaseof theex-employee was treatable and not permanentin nature which didnot resultin loss of employment- Hencethecase

¶1868

¶1869

			surgery. .Theremightbe mild functionallimitation duetospinesurgery andOsteoArthritis Kneebutitdoes not result in lossof emnlovment.	is categorized under Clause e.4.o(iil.
t6	Durganr Gangaram	OldCVAwith hemiparesis; post-stroke seizures	. He wassuffering withCerebrovascular Accidentwhichisa condition causedby decreasedbloodflow to braintreatablewith MedicalManagement and Physiotherapy. .Hewasalso suffering from disc bulgeatC3- C4andC6-C7thecal compressionwhich can betreatedby MedicalManagement and Physiotherapy, o As thediseasesare treatableanddoesnot result in lossof employment.	After takinginto consideration of theindependent MedicaiBoarci report dated 28.01.2023of GandhiMedical Hospital,the Committeeisof the opinion that thedisablement of the ex- employeewas treatableand notpermanent innaturewhich did not result in loss of emplo5rment. Hencethecase is categorized underClause e.4.o(iif.
24	Chenda I'larayana	Both eyes glaucomatous optic atrophy	. He wassuffering fromdefectivevision botheyesdueto glaucomatousoptic atrophy. Glaucoma is a condition with irreversible, progressiveopticnerve damagewhichis⁼a multifactorialdisease i.e. genetic,age related,h5pertension DiabetesMellitus, Heart disease, Smokingetc.Inthe initial stage of Glaucoma, the peripheralvisionis usually alfected sparingthecentral vision. Evenin	After takinginto consideration of theindependent MedicalBoard report dated 28.OL.2O23of GandhiMedical Hospital,the Committeeisof thectpinionthat thediseaseof theex-employee wasmanageable and not permanentin naturewhich did not resultin loss of employment. Hencethecase is categorized underClause

¶1870

¶1871

			advancedstagethe centralvisionremains intact anditusually takesanaverageof10- 15 years before causingseverevision lossofblindnessifleft untreated. The disabilityoftl,eabove disease is of permanentnaturebut theprogressioncanbe slowedorhaltedwith earlydiagnosisand treatment.
32	Vasala Mogili	C5-C6cervical fusionwith recovering quadriparesis	r He wasoperated withC5-C6Cervical tusion(2018)with recovering quadriparesis(right upperlimbandlower limbweakness-power- 4/sl. oPatientwasalready operatedwithC5-C6 Cervicalfusion. oTheremaybemild functionallimitation duetoquadriparesis (recovering)butitdoes notresultinlossof emplo5rment.	After takinginto consideration of theindependent MedicalBoard report dated 28-OI.2O23of GandhiMedical Hospital,the Committeeisof the opinion that thediseaseof theex-employee wastreatable and not permanentin naturewhich didnot resultin loss of employment. Hencethecase is categorized underClause 9.4.O(iil.

¶1872

The above illustrations indicate a pattern wherein speciftc and permanent disabilities have been subsumed under the omnibus category of^*general physical debility."

¶1873

We also note that six cases were placed under Clause^(i). The existence of these sk cases demonstrates that the Board was aware of the distinction. However, the criteria applied for inclusion

¶1874

¶1875

in Clause (i), as opposed to Clause (ii), are not disclosed in the report.^'[he absence of reasoning renders judicial review difficult.

¶1876

It is a well-settled principle of law that this Court, in the exercise of its power of judicial review, does not sit as a Court of appeal over expert opinions, particularly in technical or medical matters. The wisdom and expertise of a duly constituted medical board are ordinarily entitled to great deference. However, this principle of judicial restraint is not absolute. It admits of exceptions where the decision-making process is found to be fundamentally flawed, unreasoned, or palpably arbitrar5r. Judicial review becomes not only permissible but imperative when the outcome of an expert process is so starkly at odds with the evident facts on record that it shocks the judicial conscience.

¶1877

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Veer Pal Singh a. Ministry of Defencer has held as under:

¶1878

Although. the courts are extremelv loath to interfere with the spinlgn of the experts. there is nothine like exclusion of iudicial review of the decision taken on the basis of such opinion. What needs to be emphasised is that the opinion of the e:qlerts deserves gespgt and not worship and the courts and other iudicial/ouasijudicial forums entrusted with the task of deciding the disputes relating to premature release/discharge from the Errmy czrnnot, in each and every case, refluse to examine the record of the Medical Board for determining whether or not the conclusion reached by it is legally sustainable.

(emphasis supplied)

tlzots; 8 SC,l 83

In the present case the record of proceedings reveals repeated directions by this Court requiring objective reassessment by independent medical boards. Notwithstanding such directions, the near-uniform categorisation under Clause (ii) has persisted across assessments, despite the presence of catastrophic and demonstrably perrnanent disabilities. When a pattern of mechanical classification is evident, and when the gulf between the medical reality of a workman's condition and the label assigned to it is so wide, the Court cannot abdicate its Constitutional duty to uphold the rule of law and ensure that benefrcial welfare provisions are not rendered illusory by unreasoned executive action. To hold otherwise would be to permit a patently erroneous classification to gain immunity merely by virtue of being stamped by an txpert' body.

¶1883

The record of proceedings reveals repeated directions by this Court requiring objective reassessment by independent medical boards.

¶1884

Particularly, when this Court directed that tJ:e Committee act strictly on the basis of the report of Gandhi Medical Hospital dated 28.01.2023, the subsequent consideration appears to have drawn upon additional materials, contrary to the specilic mandate, necessitating a direction for further assessment by the committee.

¶1885

¶1886

The fine[ report of the Committee was submitted on O4.02.2026 is under judicial scrutiny.

¶1887

Ttre appellant-company has consistently invoked the age bar of 58 years and the condition of leftover service of less than two years. These factors are relevant only if the employee legitimately falls under Clause (ii). If the case falls under Clause (i), neither age nor lefto'rer service operates as a disqualification- The sequencing adopted by the appellant by first categorising under Clause (ii), then invoking age/serwice bars, effectively defeats the scheme.

¶1888

Further, Clause 9.4.O of NCWA-VI is part of a bipartite settlement under the Industrial Disputes Act. Such settlements possess statutory force and must be implemented in their true spirit.

¶1889

It ir; setfled law that welfare measures must receive a beneficial construction. Social security provisions are intended to protect workmen who have suffered permanent incapacity during serwice. Any interpretative ambiguity must^{lean in favour of the} benefiiiary. Compassionate or^{dependent employmentschemes,} though not fundamental rights,^{confer enforceable entitlements} when conCitions are satisfied. Fairness and^{objectivity in} classificatic,n are indispensable.

¶1890

Befor,: delving further into the^{merits, we must also take} judicial nob.ce of the human element that forms the silent bedrock

¶1891

¶1892

of this litigation. These appeals are not merely about the interpretation of a senrice clause; they are about the lives of men who spent their years in the dark and dusty depths of coal mines, a profession fraught with peril and known to consume the health of those who toil in it. The respondents are workrnen who have^given their prime to the nation's ener5/ security, often at the cost of their own physical well-being. They now suffer from ailments that have, in many cases, robbed them of their mobili$r, their vision, or their fundamental bodily integrity. One workman, Mr. Madurakavi Kistaiah, has endured a traumatic amputation. Others live with the aftermath of paralytic strokes, advanced malignancies, or severe cardiac events.

¶1893

At this^juncture, the petitioners'^quest for^justice for their dependents has been an odyssey spanning nearly a decade, marked by multiple rounds of litigation and medical examinations, only to be met with consistent^resistance and a^{seemingly pre-} determined outcome. The mental anguish of fighting a^prolonged legal battle, coupled with the^physicalpain of their^{disabilities,} constitutes a form of suffering that cannot be^quantifiedin monetar5r terms. [t is this profound human tragedy that lends a sense of urgency and gravity to our consideration. The repeated failure to correctly categorize their conditions has prolonged their agony and frustrated the very purpose of the social securit5r net

¶1894

¶1895

that the NCWA was intended to provide. The time for such

¶1896

protracted suffering to end is now.

¶1897

TtLis Court in Thummala Chandro;iah v. The Singareni Collieries Compang Limited2 has held as under:

¶1898

A:r employer can expect better output from his employees only if ht: looks after their welfare. One stand out feature of public er:rplo5rment is safety of tenure and assured post retirement benefits. Normally, once a person secures public employment, he becomes the sole breadwinner of the family and all other family mr:mbers depend on his earnings as a public servant. In an un.foreseen event when breadwinner meets premature death or be,:omes seriously ill, the financial arr€rngement of the family goes hafwire. As a responsible, concerned employer, it is his bounden duty to come to the rescue of such employee and/or his family members. Out of the concern/compassion to family of the employee, the concept of dependent emplo5rment has emerged. Thr: employer formulates scheme of dependent employment. The pri:nar5r objective of such scheme is to elevate (S/C alleviate) the suffering of family due to sudden death of employee or due to sicl<ness, becoming unemployable. Under the scheme of dependent emplo5rment, employer extends helping hand to the family of deceased employee/employee suffering with serious, life thrt:atening ailment, by providing employment to one of the family mernbers.

¶1899

It is to be noted that a significant factor contributing to the

¶1900

recurring riisputes in this matter appears to be the composition and functicning of the initial assessment bodies. The process of determinin,g an employee's categorization under Clause 9.+.O, while rooted in a medical diagnosis, has undeniable implications for his or her service and terminal benefits. It is a decision that sits at the intersection of medical expertise and administrative consequence.

¶1901

rw.P.No.424l7 of 2018 and batch dated. tg.o5.2o2o

¶1902

¶1903

It is apposite to note that the original scheme of the company, in its operation, failed to ensure a holistic and transparent assessment. While the medical board is rightly tasked with diagnosing the ailment, the final act of categorizing that ailment under Clause (i) or (ii) involves not just a clinical Iinding, but a legal and administrative determination that directly impacts l the rights of the workmen and their families. To ensure fairness, objectivity, and a comprehensive understanding of the workman's overall condition and its impact on his employabilit5r, the assessment team must be multi-disciplinary in the truest sense.

¶1904

4L. In this regard, it is essential that in all future assessments, the committee responsible for final categorization includ.es, in addition to the core medical specialists, a representative from the Human Resources or Personnel Department, who can appreciate the service implications, and an officer from the operational side (such as mining), who can assess the physical demands of the^job roles. Such a composition would not dilute the medical opinion but would enrich the context in which that opinion is applied, leading r to a more robust, fair, and just outcome. This procedural safeguard is vital to prevent the mechanical and uniform application of Clause (ii) to a diverse range of medical conditions, a flaw that has been at the heart of this prolonged litigation.

¶1905

¶1906

It is to be noted that the categorisation under Clause (i) or Clause (ii) is, at its core, a medical determination. This Court lacks the exp<:rtise to substitute its opinion for that of specialists in orthopaedics, neurolory, cardiolory, oncologr, ophthalmolory, and allied fields.

¶1907

However, where the finciings oi the Committee is bereit oi reasoninl3 and explanatory analysis and appears inconsistent with the statr-rtory definition, the Court cannot remain a silent spectator. The report in question in the above instances show complete non-application of mind to the injury or disease with which thr: workman has been inflicted and which rendered him permanently disabled for being categorwed under clause 9.a.O(i). In matters involving life-altering disabilities, such mechanical classificat.on is unsatisfactory.

¶1908

Conclusion

¶1909

Upon an anxious consideration of the entire record, including l.he proceedings of the Medical Board of Gandhi Medical Hospital d:tted 28.OL.2023 and 03.07.2023, the orders passed from time to time in W.A. No.39 of 2025 and connected matters, and the material extracted from the reports forming part of the record, we are of the ,:onsidered opinion that the near-uniform classification of 1,21 out of 127 cases under Clause (ii), despite the presence of serious ancl demonstrably permanent disabilities, gives rise to a prima facie infirmity in the application of Para 9.4.O of NCWA-VI.

\ \

The distinction between permarlent disablement arising from injury or disease under Clause (i) and general physical debility under Clause (ii) is substantive and cannot be blurred without defeating the object of the settlement.

¶1914

The appeltant's reliance on qge and. resid.ual service conditions, predicated upon a Clause (ii) classification, cannot be sustained where the foundational categorisation itself appeurrs legally doubtful. While this Court does not substitute its opinion for that of medical experts, it cannot permit a mechanical or unreasoned exercise that undermines a benefrcial welfare provision and in that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that the cases of workmen at serial Nos.l, 8, 16, 24 and.32 listed in the tabte at paragraph No.25 hereinabove are to be categorized as fatling in Clause (i) of 9.4-O of NCWA-VI.

¶1915

The categorisation of remaining workmen under Clause 9.4.O (ii) by the Committee does not suffer from unreasonableness or perversit5r calling for interference in judicial review by this Court.

¶1916

tsefore parting, we must express our deep anguish at the state of affairs revealed by these proceedings. Coal miners work under hazardous conditions, often sacrificing their heatth and longevity. The NCWA, negotiated between mErnagement and trade unions, represents a hard-won social security measure for these workmen and their families. When a public sector undertaking

.',

resists irnplementing such a measure through repeated litigation and non-compliance, it betrays the trust reposed in it by both the workmen and the communit5l.

¶1921

We close these matters with a sense of anguish,.hoping that the emplcyer/coal company henceforth renders a correct and just opinion based on the report of medical experts and the clear language r>f the NCWA and relevant considerations.

¶1922

considering the advanced age and precautious health of the workmen, who have endured a prolonged and arduous quest for justice, it is imperative that this litigation be brought to a quietus to ensure er definitive resolution.

¶1923

With the above observatidns and by placing the workmen listed at para 25 hereinabove in clause 9.4.0.(0 of NCWA, the writ Appeals art: disposed of- Monetary compensation paid, if any, to those workmen tisted at para 25 shalt be ad.justed or recovered from the arlmissible post retirement dues, if any, in accordance with law. Nc order as to costs.

¶1924

Conse:quently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall

¶1925

stand closed-

¶1926

To,

¶1927

SD/. A.V.S.PRASAD DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII ,6 SECTb( OFFICER

¶1928

The Chairmern and tManaging Director. Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Singareni Bhavan. Rect Hiils, Hyderabad.

¶1929

2- The Director (PA & W). The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Kothagudem Khamnrarrr Drstrict

¶1930

-^{- ( ('r',{d - -}

¶1931

- The Collieries General Company^Manager, limiteO^{(Personnel) (SCCLi Welfare Wing, Corporate Welfare and CSR' The PersonnelSingareni} Department, Singareni^{Bhavan, Hyderabad.}

¶1932

The General Manager,^{Ramagundam-lllArea, The Singareni collieries} Company Limited^{(SCCL), Ramagundam, Karimnagar District'}

¶1933

The General^{Manager, RamagundamArea, The SingareniCollieries} Company Limited^{(SCCL), Ramagundam, Peddapalli District'}

¶1934

6.TheGeneralManager,Bhupalapally,TheSingareniCollieriesCompany Limited (SCCL), Bhupalapally^{Area, Jayashankar Bhupalpalli District'}

¶1935

The General Manager,^{MandamarriArea, The Singarenicollieriescompany} Limited (SCCL), Bhupalapally,^{Mancherial District'}

¶1936

The General Manager,^{Bellampalli Area,TheSingareni CollieriesCompany} Limited (SCCL), Bellampalli^{Area, MancherialDastrict'}

¶1937

g. The General Manager, Bellampalli Area The Singareni collieries^company Limited (SCCL), Ramagundam^{Area, Karimnagar District'}

¶1938

lo.TheGeneral Manager,^{ManuguruArea, The singarenicollieriescompany} Limited (SCCL), Manr.rguru,^{Bhadradri Kothagudem District'}

¶1939

t 1 . Ttre General Manager,^{RamagundamArea-|,The Singarenicollieries} Company Limited^{(SCCL)'RamagundamArea, Peddapalli District'}

¶1940

The General^{Manager, Mandamani,The Singarenicollieriescompany} Limited (SCCL), Mandamani^Area, ,Mancherial^District'

¶1941

13.The General Manager,^{The Singareni collieries company Limited(SCCL),} Ramagundam-3 Area, Peddapalli^District'

¶1942

1 4. The General Manager,^{Ramagundam Area-l. The Singarenicollieries} Company Limited^{(SCCL), RamagundamArea, Karimnagar District'}

¶1943

15.The General Manager.^{SRP, The Singarenicollieries companyLimited} (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial^District.

¶1944

,/ 16 I.h"..G:91 Malager, Srirampur Area, The Singareni Coltieries Company

¶1945

/ Limited (SCCL), Srirampur Area, Mancherial Districi.

¶1946

1 7. The Generar Manager, Mandamarri, The Singareni coflien]es company Limited (SCCL), Mandamarri Area, Aditabad Distri;t

¶1947

18.The General Manager, Kothagudem Area, The singareni coilieries company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1948

1 9. I.hg.Cgryg l\ranager, Mandamarri Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (sccl), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶1949

20.Ihe. General Manager, yellandu Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri iothaguoem District.

¶1950

Z t . J.ne..C91-egl {Vtanager, Mandamarri Area, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL) Ramagundam Area, karimnagir. Oi.trl"t

¶1951

22 The Superintendent, Medical Board of Gandhi Medicar Hospitar, padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana.

¶1952

23 One CC to SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN. Advocate tOpUCl

¶1953

24 One CC ro SRr p.SRt HARSHA REDDY. SC FOR SCCL IOPUCI

¶1954

c ",_{.,1 . -.

¶1955

25.Two CCs to ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL, High Court for the State of Telanganrr at Hyderabad [OUTJ

¶1956

26.Two CCs to GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶1957

27.Two CD Copies

BSR Prt4.

r0r

\ \

HIGH COITJRT

DATED: 02/0312026

COMMON JUDGMENT

,W.A.NOs: 39. 40. 282.307 . 309. 31 0. 31 I . 31 2. 313. 469, 470.475, 476. 479 484.488. 499.490. 491. 492. 1 621 622 63 637 641 W4 7 672 67 676 681 71 713 714 715 716 717 737 757 772 783 894 gud 1 163 1 164 { 16s 11 71 1182 1 310 131 I 1 12 4 141 1504 & 1506 ot 2025 E o U ,€ 3 t t|Afr 2026 * * P4^.DISPOSINGi OF ALL THE WRIT APPEALSALL THE WRIT APPEALSTHE WRIT APPEALSAPPEALS ,

¶1966

. .^.DISPOSINGi OF ALL THE WRIT APPEALSALL THE WRIT APPEALSTHE WRIT APPEALSAPPEALS

¶1967

WITHOUT C:OSTS

¶1968

24^B){

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited v. Chippakurthi Mallaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited v. Chippakurthi Mallaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C. Srinivas, Vs The State of Telangana

C. Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Pathways Retail Private Limited Vs Union of India

The State of Telangana Vs Siddharth

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited Vs Bathula Nagaraju

The Singareni Collieries Company Limited Vs Chekka Lingaiah