Dismissed¶¶38

Mohsin Bin Mahfooz v. Syed Saber

Telangana HC6 Jan 2026CRP/2809/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, Hyderabad; CRP No. 2809 of 2019 (Article 227, Constitution of India); decided 06.01.2026 by Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda. Mohsin Bin Mahfooz v. Syed Saber and T. B. Hari Kumar. Challenge to order dated 22.10.2019 in I.A.No.910/2019 in O.S.No.1808/2015, XX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Main suit disposed of by trial Court's judgment and decree dated 19.07.2022; cause in CRP did not survive and became infructuous; CRP dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, ordered to stand closed.

What did the court decide?

Since the main suit O.S.No.1808/2015 was disposed of by the learned trial Court vide its judgment and decree dated 19.07.2022, the cause in the Civil Revision Petition does not survive for further adjudication and has become infructuous.

Mohsin Bin Mahfooz Vs Syed Saber — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

¶5

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2809 OF 2019

¶6

Petition under Article 227 of the constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order da\ed.22.10.2019 passed 1.A.No.910/2019 in o.s No.1808/2015 on the file of the Court of the XX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

¶7

Between:

¶8

l,4ohsin Bin Mahfooz, S/o Late Mr.H.S.Mahfooz, aged 70 years, Occ.Business, r/o H. No.20-7-468/3, lnside Fateh Daruuaza, Hyderabad ...PETITIONERYPETTTIONER/PLAINTIFF

¶9

AND

¶10

1 Syed Saber, S/o Syed Hussain, Aged 52 years, Occ.Business, ln Mulgi No.57-510 and 510/1, Nampally l\4arket, Hyderabad.

¶11

... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTiDEFENDANT

¶12

2 T. B. Hari Kumar, S/o Late T.B.Balaram, aged 43 years. Occ. photographer. R:/o H.No.5-7-5'10 and 510/'1, Nampally. Hyderabad.

¶13

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶14

PETITIONER NO./PLAINTIFF NO-1 ( NOT NECESSARY PARTY.)

¶15

Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay the suit till the disposal of CRp.

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. M M FIRDOS (Not present)

¶17

Counsel for the Respondents: M BASITH ALI YAVAR (Not present)

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TE LANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶20

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO^{N,I YDIKONDA}

¶21

DATE: O6.OL.2026

¶22

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2809^O E²⁰¹⁹

¶23

Between:

¶24

Mohsir-r Bin Ilf arl-r fooz

¶25

I): itioner

¶26

And

¶27

Syed Saber ancl another

¶28

Ii:;pondents

¶29

ORDER

¶30

This Crvil Revision Petition is filed aggr:i 'ved bv the order, darted 22.1.0.2O19. in I.A.No.910 o 2019 in O.S.No. t B0B ol 2O 15 passed by the learned X)- Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad

¶31

Nonc appears on either slde

¶32

A perusal of the case status placei before this

¶33

Court by the Registrl shou,s Lhat the main s - f. iLself u,as disposed of bv the learned trial Court uide its^j r dgnrent and decree, dated 19.O7 .2022

¶34