Dismissed

Madapathi Veeriah v. M. Narasimha Swamy

Telangana HC8 Jan 2026CRP/2399/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment records a civil revision petition where counsel submitted that the underlying cause no longer survives and is infructuous. The High Court accordingly dismissed the petition as infructuous and closed any pending miscellaneous applications.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition No. 2399 of 2019 dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stand closed.

Madapathi Veeriah Vs M. Narasimha Swamy — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

¶5

CIVIL REVISION PETI TION NO: 2399 OF 2019

¶6

Petition Under Article 227 ol lhe Constitution of lndia against the order dated 14-06-2019 in l.A.No. 210 ot 2019 in O.S.No.345 of 2007 on the file of^the Court of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Madapathi Veeriah, S/o Somaiah, Aged 68^years, Occ. Agriculture,^R/o Manpally Village and Mandal Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy

¶9

...Petitioner/ Defendant No. 1

¶10

AND

¶11

1 M. Narasimha Swamy, S/o Veeriah, Aged 45^years, Occ. Agricultural labour, Rl/o Marpally Village, Now Rl/o Ankenapally village, Sadasivpet Mandal, Sanga Reddy Dist.

¶12

Plaintiff

¶13

2 prameela, Dio veeriah, Aged 30 years, occ. House h;i5espondenu 3 Sangamesh, S/o Veeriah, Aged 30^years, Occ. Agriculture

¶14

4 Shiva Kumar, S/o Veeriah, Aged 28^years, Occ. Agriculture All are F/o Marpally Village and Mandal, Vikarabad^District

¶15

( Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are not necessary parties to the petition )

¶16

...Respondents

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High^{Courtmay be pleased to grant} stay of all further^proceedings in^pursuance of the order^passed in^{l.A. No.} 21012019 in OS No. 345 ot 2007 on the file of the Court of^{the Junior Civil Judge.} Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District^pending the above Civil^{Revision Petition.}

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. P. LAKSHMA REDDY

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI S. NARASIMHA^CHARY

¶21

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶22

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE C) I TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶23

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RA(I NANDIKONDA

¶24

cwIL REVISION PETITION No.2399 ,: t 2019

OSth JANUARY,2026

Between:

Madapathi Veeraiah

...Petitionr:. /Defendant No. 1 f

¶29

ancl

¶30

M.Narasimha Srvamv

¶31

.,Re:;r rondent/ Plaintiff

¶32

Prameela

¶33

Sangamesh

¶34

Shiva Kumar

¶35

...Respondents

¶36

(Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are not necessary parties tc .he petition)

¶37

ORDER

¶38

When the matter is taken up for hearing learned counsel for the petitioncr submits that cause in the prer; )nt civil revision petition no longer survives for adjudication rr rd has becorne infructuous

¶39

¶40

Recording the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the civil revlslon petition is dismissed as

¶41

infructuous. There sha-ll be no order as to costs

¶42

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶43

Sd/. P.PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGIST

//TRUE COPY//

ECTION OFFICER

To
1
The Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga eddy District
2
One CC to SRl. P. Lakshma Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
3 One CC to SRl. S Narasimha Chary, Advocate [OPUC]
4 Two CD Copies

kul,6 a

HIGH COURT

DATED:08/01/2026

ORDER

CRP.No.2399 of 2019

'i i i-,l': I :i:
(
l
'x<br>oo
a- c9 ,'ir7:E P]"
*
I
F'AT(II ' :o
--i_

¶55

DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION

¶56

%
ae
:p

Madapathi Veeriah v. M. Narasimha Swamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madapathi Veeriah v. M. Narasimha Swamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri D. Shivakumar Vs Sri S. Shyamsunder

Smt. D. Shaba Vs Smt. D. Prameela Kumari

Sunkaraboina Durgamma Vs Burra Saidulu and 2 others

Marem Srinivas Vs Kumunigari Krishnaveni and 2 others

A.Anitha Rani, Malakpet, Hyderabad Vs M.Shantamma (Died) and 3 Others, Hyderabad

Chakali Kashiram Vs Smt Chakali Balavva