Petitioners sought quashing of sectioned proceedings. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the underlying Sessions Case had concluded in acquittal prior to the hearing of the petition.
The Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13217 |
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8827 OF 2024
Between:
...Petitioner/Accused No. 01 to 4
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated rn the Nlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to QUASH the proceedings in S C.NO. 68 OF 2023 , before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Warangal District, Telangana State.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section,4g2 of Cr p C praying that in the : .r:umstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminat petiti;r: if,.'H,gn Cc rrt may be pleased to STAY the proceedings in s c No 68 0F 2ort" o-efore tn,, t)rincipar District and Sessions Judge, Warangal, Telangana State.
Grounds of Criminal Thispetition coming on petitio ,for hearing, upon perustng he Memorandum of A , Advocate ro, *,u pet,tiol;:t::"S,if::l:T trJffiff ::3ffi?,,:X1ll? on behalf of the Respondent No. 1,
The Court made the following: ORDER
}-..._..
I \
\ {
"^!NTHE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
CRIMINALPETITION No.8827 0F 2024
(
DATE: O 2.02.2026
Between:
Velpula PraveenKumar and Others
...Petitioner/AccusedNos.1 to 4
AND
The State of Telanganaand Another
...Respondents
ORDER
This Criminal Petitionis filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure(for short 'Cr P.C,1973) seeking quashment of the proceedings against thepetitioners-accusedNos l to 4 in S C'No'68 of 2O23 beforethelearned Principal District and sessions Judge,warangal, Telangana State.
2
I
307 of the lndian Penal Code,'1860 and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act,'1961.
5 Having considered the submissions and as the iessions Case itself has ended in acquittal, it is clear that no further orders rre warranted in this matter
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applicationr, if any, shall stand
closed.
t SD,.M.OSMAN ALI BAIG AS:] STANT REGISTRAR
,..^ (-.v
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
/
To 1. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Warang: District, Telangana State.(with records';f eaY)
Sa/PSI
<br>
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0210212026
ORDER
CRLP.No.8827 ot 2024
.4* lf'!
(L 2 4 t B ?flfi z.
*
) r./
Qs ,rct(.l-2r'
DISMISSING THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUI)US
<br>18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrP.C for quashing of proceedings should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Velpula Praveen Kumar and Others
The State of Telangana
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
