Disposed

Smt. Mumtaz Begum v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Sept 2026CRLP/14717/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, an elderly complainant, sought a direction to the trial court to conclude trial in C.C. No. 1793 of 2024 without further delay. The High Court directed the III Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible and asked parties to cooperate without seeking undue adjournments. The criminal petition was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the III Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri to conclude trial and dispose of C.C. No. 1793 of 2024 as expeditiously as possible; parties to cooperate without seeking undue adjournments.

Smt. Mumtaz Begum Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:14717 OF 2026

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt. Mumtaz Begum, S/o. late. Liyakath All Khan, Aged about 70 years, Occ Housewife, r/o. Flat No.B-713, Sy.No. 233, Paramount Apts, Shipa Nagar, Nagaram, Keesara (M), Medchal Dist.

¶9

...PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, At Hyderabad.

¶12

The Station House Officer, P.S. Keesara P.S.

¶13

Pathan Riaz All Khan, S/o. late. Pathan Sardar Ammer Alikhan, a/a. 56 years, Occ Business, r/o. Flat No. 201, Hitech Navinds avenue, 2nd floor, Shanti Nagar, Rajendernagar, Golconda, Hyderabad

¶14

.., RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS

¶15

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the lower court to dispose of the C.C.No. 1793 of 2024 on the file of the 3rd Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-lll Additional Judicial Magistrate First Class, Malkajiglri-Medchal District at Kushaiguda by fixing the time at the earliest as possible.

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri DANTU VENKATA RAMANA SARMA, Advocate for the Petitroner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the Addl. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and 2 none appeared on behalf ofthe Respondent No.3.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

IN THE^{HI(;H COURT FOR THE} STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶19

THE^{HON'OURABLESRI} JUSTTCE J.SREENIVAS RAO

¶20

CR.IMINAL PETITION No.14717 oI 2026 CNR.No.HBHC0 10618612026

Date:09.09.2026

Bet^ween:

Smt.^{Mumtaz Ilegum}

.Petitioner

AND

The^{State of Te'langana,and 2 others}

¶27

..Respondents

¶28

Order

¶29

This Cnrninal^Petition is filed seeking to direct the ieamed III Additionai^{Metr,rpolitan Magistrate,Cyberabad at Malkajgiri} to dispose of C.C.No. I 793 of^{2024 as expeditiouslyas possible.}

¶30

Heard M:.D.V.Ramana Sanna. leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent Nos. . and 2

¶31

Notice in respect of respondent No.3 is dispensed with solely on the ground that the petitioner has filed the present petition seeking expedite disposal of C.C l,,lo. 1793 of 2024, and he is nor seeking any relief against respondent No.3. as he is only proforrna respondent.

¶32

..)..

¶33

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial Court has been adjouming the matter from time to time. He further submitted that unless this Court fixes a time limit for the conclusion of the trial^and disposal of the case, the^petitioner will be^put to^great hardship

¶34

Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that old several cases are pending before the trial Court^and the^{petitioner is not} entitled to seek fixation of a time limit for disposal of C.C.No.1793^of 2024

¶35

Having considered the submissions made by the respective^parties and without expressing any view, the learned III Additional^Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri, is directed to conclude the trial and dispose of C.C.No.1793 of 2024 as expeditiously as^possible. It is^made clear that the parties in /rs shall cooperate with the trial Court^for disposal of C.C.No.1793 of 2024 without seeking undue adjoumments.

¶36

'1 . Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of

¶37

Miscellaneous applications, pending ifany, shall stand closed.

SD/. C.DEEPIKA

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-lll Additional Judicial Magistrate^First Class, Malkajigiri-Medchal District at Kushaiguda.

¶44

2 The Station House Officer,^{Police Station Keesara, Rachakonda.}

¶45

Two CCs^{to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR High Courtfor the Stateof Telangana,} at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶46

One CC to SFll. DANTU VENKATA RAMANA SARMA Advocate tOpUCI 5 Two CD Copit:s

'fPK/UA

HIGH COURT

DATED: 09t0912026

ORDER

GRLP.No.147'17 ot 2026

¶52

_ 1"'- --,..
L ; r ... .-.. -.
a
('
5o
U 1 I SEP 2026 ,;)
. ,....:.
- :---?

¶53

CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF

¶54

8\4 ,]e

Smt. Mumtaz Begum v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Mumtaz Begum v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases