Disposed

Mohammed Shabber v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Sept 2026CRLP/14673/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 528 BNSS. During hearing, counsel restricted the prayer to a direction for expeditious disposal of the trial. The High Court, without expressing any view on merits, directed the XI Additional Judicial Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District, to conclude the trial in C.C. No. 108 of 2026 as expeditiously as possible and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the XI Additional Judicial Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District, to conclude the trial and dispose of C.C. No. 108 of 2026 as expeditiously as possible; parties to cooperate and not seek undue adjournments.

Mohammed Shabber Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14673 OF 2026

¶7

Between:

¶8

Mohammed Shabber, S/o. Abdul Nazeer, Aged 33 years, Occ. Private Job, R/o.Bhagyalatha Colony, Hayathnagar, Street No.3, Ranga Reddy District. N/o, H.No.1-47, 8 incline colony, Near shopping complex, Ramagundam (M), Karimnagar District.

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, represented by the Public Prosecutor of High Court at Hyderabad.

¶12

Md. Uzma Afreen,, W/o.Md. Shabbeer, Aged 32 years, R/o. Flat No.104, Nawal Crown Plaza-ll, PandT Colony, Suncity, Gandipet(M), R.R.District500086.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS

¶14

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash proceedings in CC No. 108 of 2026 on the file of the Xl Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Ranga Reddy District at Rajendranagar.

¶15

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026

¶16

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 108 of 2026 on the file of the Xl Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Ranga Reddy District at Rajendranagar pending disposal of the criminal petition.

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N KRISHNA SUMANTH, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the Addl. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared on behalf of the Respondent No.2

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

IN THE TII(;H COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO

¶21

CIUMINAL PETITION No.14673 of 2026 CNR.No. H8HC010593782026

Date:09.09.2026

Between:

Mohammed Shabber

.Petitioner

AND

The State ofTelangana, and another

¶28

...Respondents

¶29

Order

¶30

This Crirninal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused No.1

¶31

seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.108 of 2026 on the file of the leamed XI Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Rajendranagar

¶32

Heard Mr.N.Krishna Sumanth, leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Jithende. Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Pubiic Prosecutor for respondent N o. I

¶33

Though t're Criminal Petition was filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.108 of 2026 by raising several ggounds, the learned counsel for the petitioner restricted his prayer to direct the

¶34

¶35

leamed Xl Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class,^RangaReddy District at Rajendranagar, to conclude the trial and dispose of C.C.No.108 of 2026 as expeditiously^{as possible.}

¶36

Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that several old cases are pending before^the trial^{Court and the} petitioner is not, entitled to seek expedite disposal of^C.C.No.108 of 2026.

¶37

Having considered the submissions made by the^{respective parties} and without expressing any view, the learned XI^{AdditionalJudicial} Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy^{District at Rajendranagar, is} directed to conclude the trial and dispose of^{C.C.No.108 of 2026as} expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that^{the parties in /rs shall} cooperate with the trial Court for disposal of^{C.C.No.108of 2026} without seeking undue adj oumments

¶38

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of

¶39

Miscellaneous applications,^pending ifany,^{sha1l standclosed}

¶40

SD/- C.DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Xl Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class^{Ranga ReddyDistrict at} Rajendranagar

¶45

2 The Station House Officer, Police^{Station Rajendranagar, Cyberabad.}

¶46

3 Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶47

4 One CC to SR N KRISHNA SUIMANTH Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies

TPt(BAv

I I

HIGH COURT

DATED: 09/09/2026

ORDER

CRLP.No.14673 o12026

..:'"', ,i j ..'t t..-
:t,.;1.
1
(
t.-
:,
1 g SIP 2UZ6
J
+

, 6 . , : 111 '--,<br>

¶55

CRIMINAL PETITION !S DISPOSED OF

¶56

Mohammed Shabber v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Shabber v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases