The High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking to set aside an impugned order. The court held that since the underlying case ended in acquittal on 17.11.2025, the petition became infructuous and did not survive.
Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous being the case ended in acquittal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12023 OF 2023
Between:
...PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOs.1 &2
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/DE.FACTO COMPLAINANT
Petitbn under Section 482 of Cr.P C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the above Crl.,P by setting aside the order dated. 0311112023 in Crl., M P No. 3739 of 2023 in C C No,'1597 of 2019 passed bythe learned Xl Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad, TS.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners/ accused No.1 and 2 in C C No. 1597 of 2019 (Crime No. 61 of 2019, daled.12l02l2019 of PS Begumpet, T.S) pending on the file of the learned Xl Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Secunderabad.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusinlr lhe Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arg.r nents of sri BETHI vENKATESWARLU, Advocate for the Petitioners and the ,ublic prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 , and Sri Ch Sriniva ; Advocate for the Respondent No 2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
f.
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE TIRUMALADEVI EADA
CRIMINALPETITION No.12023of 2023
DATE OF ORDER: 03.02.2026
Between:
Mohd.Mohsin Khan& another
...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1& 2
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutorand another
...Respondents
ORDER
Code of Criminal Procedure(for sho(,'Cr.P.C) seeking to set- aside the order dated03.11.2023 passedin Crl.M.P.No.3739of
2023 in C.C.No.'1597 of 2019on the file of the learned Xl
Additional Chief MetropolitanMagistrate at Secunderabad.
//
2
acquittal on 17.11-2025. Hence, the cause ir the Criminal
Petition does not survive and has become infructuc .ts
infructuous
closed.
;d/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI AI; ;ISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
ft
--'.tl'
HIGH COURT
DATED:0310212026
ORDER
CRLP.No.12023 ot 2023
1 ; i sl; €
(
).
o
.J 2 d -LB 202[
)..
S'\TC
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS.
."td
q
S*'"
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition survives given the acquittal in the underlying charge sheet case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd Mohsin Khan
Mohd Akbar
The State of Telangana
Sri PullaAmresh Kumar
Justice Tirumala Devi Eada
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
