Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of P.R.C. No. 92 of 2023 against Accused No. 1. The PRC was already disposed of by committal order and is pending before the sessions court; the court dismissed the petition as infructuous with liberty to pursue remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I t 34441
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAYTHE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY WO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10564 OF 2023
Between:
...PETITION ER/ACCUSED NO. 1
AND
...RESPON DENT/COM PLAINANT
. Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the impugned proceedings in P.R.C. No. 92 OF 2023, on the file of the XVtl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, in so far as the Petitioner / Accused No. 1 is concerned
l.A. NO: zOF 2023
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in P.R.C. No. 92 OF 2023, on the file of the XVll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, including arrest, appearance and attendance of the petitioner / Accused, pending disposal of the above Criminal petition
This Petition coming on forhearing, upon perusingthe Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition andupon hearing the argumentsof Sri PRASAD RAVANABOINA ,Advocate for thePetitioner and the AdditionalPublic Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No1. andSri K.Ravinder Reddy Advocate for the Respondent No2.
The Court made the following:ORDER
I I
t-i U A HYDERABAD
--ri ES
\
N 1
Date:02.02.2026
Betwer:n:
Mohd. Rasheed Khan
...Petitioner
AND
The Sterte of Tetangana, Rep by itspublic prosecutor, High C.urt of Telangana, at Hyderabad and another
Respondents
ORDER
Ttre judgment praced on record arready states that the PRC w€rs arready disposed of vide committar order dated 15'02'20.7-4 and the matter is pending before the sessions court' l-he present petition was fired chailenging the proceedirgs in p.R.c.No -g2 of 2023. Due to the change in circumstarlces, the cause in the present petition does not survive for further adjudication.
rn vi'=w of the same, this criminar petition is dismissed as infructuous, with a riberty to the petitioner to avair the remedies
*'tt'
')
(-t
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed
Sd/. N. CHANDRA SEKHAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR 6
//TRUE COPY/
SECTION OFFICER
To,
AG
I fnI
HIGH COURT
DATED t0210212026
.S
ii)
24fi:82tl2n
*
ORDEFI
CRLP.t{o.l0564 of 2023
CRLP IS DISPOSED OF
a"\uu
\3 <br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quash petition survives when the PRC proceedings have already been committed to the sessions court?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Rasheed Khan
The State of Telangana
Mohd. Shoiab Ahmed
Tirumala Devi Eada
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
