Disposed¶37

Smt.D.Nalini Reddy v. Smt.Ranjeev Acharya, I a S.

Telangana HC6 Feb 2026CC/1786/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt Case No. 1786 of 2015, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, decided 06/02/2026 by Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao: closed as not pressed. Petitioner Smt. D. Nalini Reddy (counsel M.V. Pratap Reddy representing V. Maheswar Reddy) withdrew her allegation that respondents Smt. Ranjeev Acharya, I.A.S. and Ashok Kumar violated the Court's orders dated 01-04-2015 in WPMP No. 11753/2015 in W.P. No. 8920/2015; filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act; no adjudication of contempt; miscellaneous applications closed; without costs.

What did the court decide?

When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not pressing the present Contempt Case, and the Court recorded this submission. ¶36

Smt.D.Nalini Reddy Vs Smt.Ranjeev Acharya, I a S. — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR

¶5

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1786 OF 2015

¶6

Contempt Case Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated 01-04-2015 in WPMP No. 11753/2015 in WP No. 8920/ 2015.

¶7

Between:

¶8

9[tQ!',I?!in!^{Reddy,Wo.K.VenugopalReddyAged 57 years, OccLecturer,R/o.} 3-4-5261281102, A R K Nivas, Barkatpura, Hyderabad - 50O O27 .

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

¶11

Smt.Ranjeev Acharya, I A S.,, Presently Wo. B P Acharya, Prl. Secretary Education^{Department, The Government of Telangana Secretariat Buildihgs,} Hyderabad.

¶12

Ashok Kumar, The Commissioner and Director cum lntermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. ... Respondents/ and2

¶13

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.V. PRATAP REDDY, representing SRI. V. MAHESWAR REDDY

¶14

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION

¶15

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶16

¶17

IN T}IE HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶18

THE HOT{'BLE SRI^{]USTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO}

¶19

DATE: A6.02.2026

¶20

CONTEM CASE No.1786 oF 2015

Between:

Smt. D.Nalini tleddY

...Petitioner

AND

Smt. Ranjeev r\citarYa,^I.A.S.,

¶27

W/o. B.P. Acharya, PresentlY Prl. Secretary Education Department,

¶28

¶29

The Governmert of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings,^{Hyderabadand another}

¶30

...Respondents

¶31

-qBLB

¶32

Heard lvrr. M.V. Pratap Reddy,^{!earned counsel representing}

¶33

Mr. V. Maheswar Redcjy, learned counsel^{for the petitioner}

¶34

Z. This Corrtempt Case is filed alieging^{violationof the order passedby} this Court in^{\A/.P.M.P.No.11753of 2015 in W.P.No.B920 of 2015 dated} 01.04.2015,

¶35

¶36

Today, when ttie matter is taken up foi- hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitionei- submits that tire petitioner is not pressing the present Contempt Case.

¶37

4- Recording the above subrnission, the Contempt Case is closed as not pressed.

¶38

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pencling, if any, in this Contempt Case, shall stancJ closer.l.

¶39

¶40

Sd/. N.CHANDRA SEKHAR DEPUry REGISTRAR G

¶41

//TRUE COPYII

¶42

SECTION OFFICER

¶43