Disposed¶61

G.Manikyamma v. Sri. C. Narayana Reddy, I.A.S

Telangana HC6 Feb 2026CC/1163/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court contempt case CC 1163/2025, Justice Pulla Karthik, decided 06.02.2026 — contempt against District Collector (SCD) Ranga Reddy, Joint Director, Commissioner and Principal Secretary, SC Development Department, for non-compliance with order dated 12.06.2024 in W.P.No.360 of 2023 seeking minimum time scale for daily wage workers of Govt SC Hostels (RR District); compliance proceedings dated 05.02.2026 placed by GP for Services III; compliance recorded, contempt case closed, no costs; counsel: Arvind Kumar Kata for petitioners; statute: Sections 10-12, Contempt of Courts Act 1971.

What did the court decide?

None; the contempt case was closed after recording compliance with the order dated 12.06.2024 in W.P.No.360 of 2023 (grant of minimum time scale already effected); no punishment for contempt, no costs ordered. ¶61

G.Manikyamma Vs Sri. C. Narayana Reddy, I.A.S — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶2

THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶6

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1163 OF 2025

¶7

Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herern for the willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 12.06 2024 passed in W P No 360 of 2023.

¶8

Between:

¶9

G.tVlanikyamma, W/o. Shiva Shanker, Age. 50 years, occ. Daily wage worker, Govt SC Boys Hostel, Koheda, RR District.

¶10

B.Yesuratnam, S/o. Laxmaiah, Age. 57 years, Occ. Daily wage worker, Govt SC Boys Hostel, Nadergul, RR District.

¶11

firlustafa Ali, S/o. [\Id. Yousuf, Age. 54 years, Occ. Daily wage worker, SWBH DH Shawali, RR District.

¶12

C. Janardhan, S/o. Venkanna, Age. 49 years, Occ. Daily wage worker, Govt SC Boys Hostel, Rajendranagar, RR District.

¶13

B.Yellaiah, S/o. Sayanna, Age. 58 years, Occ. Daily wage worker, Govt SC Girl Hostel, Chevella, RR District.

¶14

P.Lalitha, W/o. Kishan, Age. 58 years, Occ. Daily wage worker, Govt SC Boys Hostel, Hayathnagar, RR District.

¶15

tt/. Ravinder, S/o. Eshwaraiah, Age. 57 years, Occ. Daily wage worker, Govt SC Girls Hostel Shamshabad, RR District.

¶16

D. Srinivas, S/o. Buggappa, Age. 55^years, Occ. Daily wage worker, Govt^SC Boys Hostel, Shankerpally, RR District.

¶17

S. tVlallesh, S/o. Lingaiah, Age. 54 years, Occ. Daily wage worker,^{Govt SC} Boys Hostel, Hayathnagar, RR District.

¶18

10.Sk. Jahangir, S/o. Lal f\4ohamood, Age. 52 years, occ. Daily wage^worker, Govt SC Boys Hostel, D.H. Shawali, RR District.

¶19

K. Manik Rao, S/o. Balaiah, Age. 54^years, Occ. Daily wage worker,^{Govt SC} Girls Hostel Shankerpally, RR District.

¶20

12.K. Vittalaiah, S/o. Balaiah, Age. 59 years, Occ. Daily wage worker, Govt^SC Boys Hostel Pedda lilangalaram, RR District.

¶21

13.T. Balaiah, S/o. Sivaiah, Age.53 years, occ. Daily wage worker,^{Govt SC} Boys Hostel, Angadi, Chittampally, RR District.

¶22

14 9. J.a1qalnma, wo. Sanieevaiah, Age. 53 years, occ. Daily wage worker, Govt SC []oys Hostet, purjur, RR Oistiict.

¶23

¶24

15 N Gopal,. 9{q BgT,"iah, Age. 51 years, Occ. Daily wage worker, Govt SC Boys Hostel No.ll Vikarabadl RR District.

¶25

16.Yashoda' {o lp[qr,Age 46 years, ma Dairy wage worker, Govt SC Boys Hostel, Terndur, RR DistricI.

¶26

17.8. SC Bheenraiah, Boys Hoster, fuIohamadabad.Vit<arabad, RR s/o. Ramaiah, Age, 5g years, occ. District. Daily^' wage worker, r- Govt

¶27

18.K. Naresh,,s/o. Ramachary. {s_e.so years, occ Dairy wage worker, Govt sc Girls Hosrel, Rajendranagar. RR Oistrict.

¶28

19.Balammr, Ag9, 5G^fears, occ Daily wage worker, Govt SC Boys Hostel, Nandivana Parthy, RR District.

¶29

20 y .Ra.ng:riah, &: js years, occ. Daily wage worker, Govt SC Boys Hostel, Batasingaram, RR Distiict.

¶30

21.Nagamarti, Wo. tVlallaiah, Agg. 55. Occ. Daily wage worker. Govt SC Boys Hostel, Valabnagar, tMedchat. nn District.

¶31

(All the petitioners are presently working as Daily wage workers in the respondernt. organization except Petitioner" Nos. S, ig ^ia Zl as they are expired curing the pendency of the W p )

¶32

... PETITIONERSM/RIT PETITIONERS

¶33

AND

¶34

1' Sri. C. Narayana Bu9oV, lAS, District Collector (SCD) Ranga Reddy District at Konga rakalan, Hydeiabad.

¶35

2' Sri J. Rarma Rao, Joint Director presently the said post hold by Dy. Director, s.c De'uelopment. Department,' Rangi Reddy 6iitii.i, b76'nn District collectorate complex, Kongarakalan, R-anga n",iov oirtri"i.^{- -}

¶36

Sri N. Kshitija,. Commissioner, SC Development Department, D.S.S.Bhavan, lMasab T ank, Hyderabad.

¶37

¶38

4' Sri N. Sridh.al IAS-.Principal Secretary, State of Telangana, SC Development Departn"ent, BRK Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶39

... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶40

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Arvind Kumar Kata

¶41

Counsel for tl"re Respondents: Gp for Services lll

¶42

The Court ma'Je the following: ORDER

¶43

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAISAD

¶44

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I{ARTHIK

¶45

CASE No.1 163 oF 2025,

¶46

THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, T1[IO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SD(

¶47

Between:

¶48

G.Manikyamma & (20) orhers

¶49

... Petitioner

¶50

AND

¶51

Sri C.Narayana Redd5,, I.A.S.,

¶52

District Collector (SCD),

¶53

Ranga Reddy district & (3) others.

¶54

... Respondents

¶55

ORDER :

¶56

complaining 'villful disobedience on the part of the

¶57

respondents in complying'uvith the orcier passecl by this Court in w.P.No.360 of 2023 dated 12.6.2024, the present contempt case is filed.

¶58

Today, r,r,hen the matter is taken up for disposal, the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents placed before the court ttre proceedings vide Lr.Rc.No.F2lllz2l2ols dated 5.2.2026 and submitted that the orders of this court dated

¶59

¶60

12.6.2024 in W.P.No.360 of 2023 has beeu complied with by the respondents to the extent of granting minimum time scale to the petitioners The same is not seriously disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶61