Dismissed¶40

N Manoj Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Apr 2025WP(TR)/6380/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Infructuous dismissal; no contact from petitioner; promotion as Assistant Pay and Accounts Officer; Deputy Pay and Accounts Officer; State of Telangana Finance and Industries & Commerce Departments; Pay and Accounts Officer; liberty to approach Court; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications closed; Writ Petition (TR) 6380 of 2017; High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad; Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, J.; decided 04-04-2025; no merits decided; no cases or statutes construed.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition (TR) dismissed as infructuous without costs, on the ground of no contact from the petitioner; liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the Court afresh if any grievance survives; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, closed. The merits of the promotion grievance were not adjudicated. ¶40

N Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[³³⁰⁴ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY ,THE^{FOURTH DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYFIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICENAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO}

¶6

WR TP^ETITION TR NO: 6380 OF 2017

¶7

Between:

¶8

N. I\ilanoi Kumar. S/o Muthaiah,^{Aged about55 years, Workingas DeputyPay} and Aciounts Officer,^{0/0 Pay and Accounts Officef, lnsuranceBuilding} Complex, Tilak Road,^Abids, Hvderabad

¶9

...AppLlCANT

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telanoana,^{rep by its Principal Secretary, Finance (Admn lll)} Department, Telang5na Secretariat.^{Hyderaad50O O22.}

¶12

2 Tn6 State of Teianqana^{rep by its Principal Secretary,lndustriesand} commerte^(tFR.ttt De-partmeni,^{Telangana Secretarlat,Hyderabad50Q022.}

¶13

? The Pay and Rccbunts Qfficei,^{State'of Telangana,A.F.G.L.l Buildings'Tilak} Road,Abids, Hyderabad.

¶14

1. J V.Piasad S/d and aqe not^{known to the applicant, Occ SuperintendentO/O} Pay and'Accounts Offi-cer,^{A P,G L I Buildings, Tilak Road,Ablds, Hyderabad}

¶15

...EESPoNDENrs

¶16

Petition under^Seclign ??6^{aPC. praying thq! in the cir9umstAncesQtatedin} the affidavit filed in suppqrt^{ef the petition, the l-.ligh Court maybe plqasedto} prohibit the respondents in^{prqmoling him qq Assiqtant Pay pnd ,!c99untl Oflcer} and further cpqseqgently direqt^the tesporl{qnls^{nat to qisturb the apPlicants ffom} the post of^pgputy Pay and^{AccoultsOfficer}

¶17

Counsel for the Petitionqr:^{Ms . BEESAM} VIJAYA^{LAKSHMI PRAFHAKAR}

¶18

counself ortfieRe$ponr",",ojrtf&tltfit?jttNDPLAI'rNrGi

¶19

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶20

THE HON'B t: T AR RAO

¶21

WR::T PETITI ON^(TR)No.538O OF 2O17

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Sri B. vij^{lva Lakshmi Prabhakar,learnedcounserlfor the} petitioner, inf crr t,::d this Court that there has been no cor tact^from the petitioner.

¶24

In vie,rr^{r t} the above^{submissionmade by ther learned} counsel for :l:^petitioner, this Writ^Petition s^rlismissed as infructuoul;,^{I l)wever,} if the^{petitioner has any grievartce, he is} at liberty to ap^rroach the^{Court. There shall be nc crrler as to} costs.

¶25

As a s€ clu^: l, miscellaneous applications^pendirrg, f any, in

¶26

this Wrlt Petitior^{shall sLard closed.}

¶27

SD/-S. MALI.IH,ARJUNA RAO AS 51S TI\NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

¶28

,..J sEic'iloN oFFICER

¶29

To,

¶30

One CC to lIs^{:]EESAM VIJAYALAKSHN4IPRAAdAKAR.\dVOCAIC} LOPUC,] i. il; ccs^to : '^{FcrR FINANQEAND PLANNING,HighcoL rt 'or the state of} Telanoana at^F iderabad [OUTI 3 T;; ids to^{'3 i FoR sERvlCES, HighCourt for the state of 'l elangana.at} Hvderabad l()L' I a. Two CP Copie,

B tVI BS lt^cr-

HIGH COURT

DATED:0410'l'2025

sLl c
-)
2 3 !AY 2025
,. .!tt
,., ! ra Tcu'Zo n

¶38