Disposed

Narsimulu Reddy and 4 others v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC10 Apr 2025WP(PIL)/11/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Special Original Jurisdiction petition by farmers seeking relocation of a polluting iron industry based on MoEF guidelines and Article 21. The court, noting a prior order on similar facts in W.P.No.2951 of 2005, disposed of the petition by applying the directions contained in that earlier order without costs.

What did the court decide?

Directions in the present writ petition accorded with the previous order in W.P.No.2951 of 2005 dated 10.09.2024; petition disposed of without costs.

Narsimulu Reddy and 4 others Vs State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³⁴⁴⁶ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY ,THE TENTH^{DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY FIVE}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING^{CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL} AND THE HONOURABLE^{SMT JUSTICE RENUKAYARA}

¶7

WP^(PIL )NO:11 OF^2O23

¶8

Between:

¶9

Narsimulu Reddy, s/o.^{Bal Raj Aged-5Q} Y^g.ars.,^{Occ-Aoriculture' Rl/o H' No'}

¶10

? ' b-o+-, Cril., rvrihloi, xoniJig ilrlnorr''sh"dnasar' -iarya [eaov^ ttl9oil9SS-63SS3O1t Email ld- Nil^{Aad-har Card No- 881 1 331 1 1163 Pan Card No-} APSJPN1557C

¶11

Lingala Chinnaiah Goud, S/o.^{Jangaiah Go-udAged-67} .^years,Occ- - Aoiiculture, Rio. H.No. 3-8, Pulusu Mamidi, Kondurg Mandal, Shadnagar' ii],i6"Etiov. i,rouir"- bslibso6io^{ematt td- Nit Aadh;r Card No- 7258 25e2} 7657 Pan Card No- CLMPC741^1E

¶12

Dabbu Sreenivas,^{S/o. DabbuVenkataiah, Aged-34 yearl Oc9- Agriculture'} Rl/o. H. No.2-3, Parvathapuram^{village, Kondurg Mandal,Shadnagar' Ranga} nLOOv fr4oOife_^{'saq1szsi4e Email ld-- dabbusrinu5orgrnait.comAadhar Card} No-2077 2311 7792 Pan Card^{No- BX0PD3630B}

¶13

Durga Venakataih, S/o.^{PochaiahAged-4p.} vears,Occ-^{Aqryqllyll^Yo^-,I;} No.'1 -95, Parvathapuram village,^{KondurgMand.al, Shad nagar'Ranga.Ke,ooy} Mobile- i5OB 6534 2852^{Email ld- venkateshkurma99orgmail.com Aadnar} Card No- 2508 6534 2852Pan^{CardNo- CAAPV6255N}

¶14

Cheouri Narsimha Reddv, S/o.^{Laxma Reddy, Aged- 45 years'- occ-} Aqridulture, Fi./o. H.^{No.-3-79, Pulusu Mamidivillage,..Kond,urS,.]YaItg3l'} SHadnaoar. Ranqa Reddy^{Mobile_9100698414 EmailId- Nil Aadharcard No-} 5404 01-62 941 6^-Pan Card^{No- CJYPN9775Q}

¶15

...PETITIONERS

¶16

AND

¶17

1 . State of Telangana,^{Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Environment Department,} Secretariat, HYderabad

¶18

Telangana State Pollution^{Control Board' Ttrrough its Chairman, A-3'} - pi.viiiiJnEnauan, Sanath Nagar Road, Sanafhnagar lndustrial Estate' Saniathnagar, Hyderabad^{- 500018.}

¶19

M/s- Om Shiv Shakthi^{lron lndustries Pvt. Ltd, Sy' Nos- 25686257'} - ff71orjifig',do; Vitijg;, Sh"dnagar^{Mandal, Mahbo6bnagarDistrict- 509001'}

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition under ,Article^{226 of the constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavit filedtherewith,the High court may be} pleased to pass an appropriate^{writ, order or direction, and in pa'ticularly one in} the nature of^{Writ of Mandamus-}

¶22

a.To declare the^{action of the RespondentNos. 1 and 2 in not relocating} iesponOent No.3^{to other area from the present location, as illegal, arbitrary'} violative of^{guidelinesfor Spongelron plants notifiedby Ministry rrf Envkonment,} Forest and climate^{3hange (MoEF), New Delhi dated 30.05.2008, for being} violative of Article^{121 of the lndian Constitution'}

¶23

b.TodirecttheRespondentNos.land2torelocatetheRespondentNo.3 inOustry to other area^{from its present area and be pleasedto ptass such other} order/ i as this Hon'ble^{Court maydeem fit in the best interest of ju stice.}

¶24

c.To^pass appropr^{ate directionsto not allow polluting industriesto set up their} op"rriion. that^{have cletrimentaleffecton human health and envircnment.}

¶25

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶26

Petition undrtr^{r3ection 151 CPC praying that in the circumslances statedin} the affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition, the High court may be 5:leasedto direct} direct the Respondenr^{Nos. 1 to 3 to closethe Respondent No. 3 irdustry,pending} disposal of the^{presentpublic interest litigation.}

¶27

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{Ms. SAMHITHA NIMMALA}

¶28

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.'l: SRI MOHD. IMRAN KHANADDL',} ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶29

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.2: SRI ZEESHANADNANMAHMOOD(SC TS} POLLUTTON CONTROL^BOARD)

¶30

Counsel for the Respondent^{No'3:SRI DEEPAKMISHRA}

¶31

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶32

¶33

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF.IUSTICE SU.IOY PAUL

¶34

AND

¶35

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA

¶36

WRIT PETITION PIL No. 11of2023

¶37

ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul)

¶38

I Ms.Samhitha Nimmala, learned counsel for the petitioners; l Sri Mohd. Imran Khal, learned Additional Advocate^{General for} the State of Telangala, for respondent No.l; Sri^ZeeshanAdnan Mahmood, learned Standing Counsel for Telangala State^Pollution Control Board, appearing for respondent No.2^and Sri Deepak Mishra, Iearned counsel for respondent^No.3.

¶39

With the consent, finally heard.

¶40

During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the^parties jointly and fairly submitted that the similar point became subject matter of consideration in W.P.No.2951 of 2005^{decided on} lO.Og.2O24 arld this writ^{petition may} be^{disposedof in terms of} the order passed in the said writ^petition.

¶41

In view of the consensus arrived at, this^{writ petition is} disposed of in terms of the order^{passed in W'P.No.2951 of 2OO5} dated 10.09.2024. The directions contained^{in the said order so}

¶42

¶43

far it relates r1) paragraph No.6(i) and (ii) u,i11 ap trl1. mutatis mutandis to this r,r'rit petition with fu1l force. No order ars to costs.

¶44

Miscellaleous petitions pending, if any, shall star:.d closed.

¶45

To,

¶46

SD/.T. JAYASREE DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII

¶47

'tr.._ ;TION OFFICER I^bec

¶48

1 . The Principal Secretary, Environment Department, Secretaria i, Hyderabad

¶49

Telangana State Pollution Control Board, Through its Chairmern, A-3, Paryavaran Bhavan, Sanath Nagar Road, Sanaihnagar Indus:rial Esiate, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad - 500018.

¶50

One CC to Ms SAMHTTHA NI|VIMALA Advocate tOpUCl

¶51

One CC to SRl. ZEESHAN ADNAN MAHMOOD (SC TS pOLt_UTtON CONTROL BOARD) Advocate [OPUC]

¶52

5 One CC to SRI DEEPAK MISHRA Advocate tOpUCl

¶53

6 Two CCs to ADVOCATE GENERAL, High Court for the State, of Telangana at Hyderabarj. [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies KKS LS

HIGH COURT

DATED:1010412025

ORDER

(oR It E sr4 14:
,i\ )('(
-L 3J AI8 1U11 :
)
i.. + _ l.
C
<br>

¶58

WP(P!L).No.11 of 2023

¶59

DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶60

L"o

Narsimulu Reddy and 4 others v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narsimulu Reddy and 4 others v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. M.B. Engineering Works Vs Assistant Commissioner (St)

M/s. Mpm Ventures Private Limited Vs Joint Commissioner of Central Tax

M/s. Pattiwar Krishi Kendra Vs The Assistant Commissioner St

M/S. Ravi Rishi Educational Society Vs the Dy. C.T.O. and 2 Others

Dsv Air and Sea International Private Limited Vs State of Telangana

Chirag Sharma Vs Union Of India