Writ petition alleging illegal detention at Vanasthalipuram police station and coerced registration of a sale deed under FIR under BNS provisions was permitted to be withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to pursue remedies available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31661
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOO KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 9870 OF 2025
Between:
Pendurthi Veenaju, S/o.Ramachandra Rao, Aged about 52 years, Occ. Farmer, Rl/o.118, Plot.no.49, Doyon Villa, Sri Nagar Colony, Hyderabad, Telangana.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the respondent.no.S and 6 and its authorities herein in calling the petitioner to the Police Station Vanasthalipuram, Rachakonda and confining in the police station illegally pursuant to FlR.no.1237 of 2024 of P.S.Vanasthalipuram, Rachakonda U/Sec. 316(2), 318(4) BNS,
',"'7
despite there is no cognizabre offence made out against the petitioner and the respondents.no.5 a1d 6 by misusing their powers had put the petitioner in fear of death and taken his signatures on a sare Deed by coerc on and got registered the same in favor or respondent.no.T as arbitrary, ilegar, and in utter vioration of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articlr:s 14 and 2.1 of the constitution of lndia
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition unde' Section i s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High (lourt may be pleased to direct the respondent.no.5 and 6 and its authorities herein in calring the petitioner to the Po ice station Vanasthalipuram, Rachakcnda and confining in the police statiol illegalty pursuant to FlR.no.1237 of 2024 of P. S.Vanastha lipu ranr Rachakonda U/sec. 316(2), 3i s(4) t3NS, despite there is no cognizabre offence made out against the petitioner and the respondents.no.5 and 6 by misusing their powers had put the petitioner in fear of death and taken his signatures on a fiare Deed by coercion and got registered the same in favor of respondent no. T irs arbitrary, ilegar, and in utter vioration of principres of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of lndia.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.L.B.KUMAR
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 4: Gp FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No. 5 to 7: ---
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINODKUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.9870 of 2025
ORDER:
After making initial submissions,learned counselfor the petitioner seeks permission of the Couftto withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to avail the remedies opento him in law.
withdrawn. No costs
stand closed.
SD/- L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER
To,
I I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0310412025
ORDER
WP.No.9870 of 2025
oR t llE s14
e
$r
o
1t A?fr M
t
I
t
l'4y:;*+t
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAWN,
WITHOUT COSTS
/t
ts ,
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Pendurthi Veenaju
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home
The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Police Commissionerate
The Deputy Commissioner of Police, L.B.Nagar, Rachakonda
The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Vanasthalipuram, Rachakonda
Bekkari Anil Kumar
T.Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
