Disposed

M/s.Bajaj Electricals Limited, v. The Deputy Commissioner (St) STU-1

Telangana HC17 Apr 2025WP/9851/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition alleging inaction by tax authorities in refunding amounts due to the petitioner under assessment orders. With counsel's consent, the Court directed the petitioner to resubmit its representation dated 06.02.2025 before respondent No.1, who was to decide it by a reasoned order within thirty days, without expressing any opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to resubmit representation dated 06.02.2025; respondent No.1 to decide it by reasoned order within thirty days.

M/s.Bajaj Electricals Limited, Vs The Deputy… — GST and Indirect Tax | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

I3446I

¶2

¶3

noo H' GH^{cou Rr'?+} I+'"8IiI=^8: .]:: tsPecii'oiibinal^{Jurisdiction)}

¶4

*''

¶5

r H u^{Rs DAY rs[} sIJSXL"'$E$+l.o,,tJ'

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE^{HONOURABLE THE ACTIN.G-CHIEFJUSTICE SUJOYPAUL}

¶8

RENUKA^YARA

¶9

THE HONOURAB,,,#.IU,,'CE

¶10

rTlo NN^O:9851OF2025

¶11

WRIT^PET

¶12

Between:"""Ii{,'?q'*,-':ffi 3 Aisociate^andAuthonseu :*t},]u#il1:}f,^{orer rarvr} '^{"" ' -i$'i':x''€"ol'Bi'',"ull33l'o'fl}

¶13

...'ET'T'ONER

¶14

AND ""lU;*:S$,y"::iSTf;+"ff t:JJ"?Ii"l;['3iS.?ll''[iA?:';:T'

¶15

The^{Joint Commissioner of State Tax' (Formerly the Deputy Commissioner}

¶16

' icili, s6"'nderabad^{Division' Hvderaoao'}

¶17

the€om^{m iss io ne r or}

¶18

3 rh^{e c hi er cq,. i:?i3fl} B:*f ISJR: Jir3lllllI Commercial^Taxes)'

¶19

o'B"t'f1",""'"li'"tSi#,tXSB;PJ,:T,?:'ff fe:?::l"i1Hi3Blift^B?[?l

¶20

PetitionunderArticle226ottheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesslqtgai1tn""'fti""'"itrr"i""-'-"y-ll,HW*::U**"#5ffi^:: i" I."r"-wtit^{.t Manilamusor any other appropna} dectaring^{the inaction ot ,il" i"iJnJentsin hot refundinqthe amount due to the} 'n"t'rii'doliTzi--ut pgt^gtoers-in A'o'No'2053'^dated Petitioner^{to a tune} ' 2s.o1.2017,A.o.No.a8osiiIttji^{ro rz zoia'"A'o'No'eo+se'dated16122o2o'A} .0.No.56161,^{out"o ro.oolzdidli o'rtr"'aiz6'o ated 28'03'2022 and A'o'No'811'} dated^{31 .07.20 24'undertil'Jpt"'tt"t-"i1n"rvnr Act 2005and CST Act 1956'} of . Princioles^{of NaturalJustice and} as consequently arbitrary,^{contrary direct the to n"Ipona"ntt 'iI"I" -in} 'iolation^{to refund the.amountof Rs'93'86''1721' due} to the^{petitioner,atong *,iiltririo.vinterest,forthwith, as per the provisionsof the} Wnf n"t^{2005andCST Act 1956}

¶21

IANO:1 OF 202s

¶22

,g,;r$$4i;il,;:,,6tt6l,#ffi i,,flifr=i ss and hardsfrip.

¶23

Counset for the petitioner: SRl. SHAIK JEELAttt gtSHe

¶24

s:E[:1r"^r'1r,%HR'SHi3fi

¶25

^'-t.];?Iflrflx3#TJr"T",^rErAx The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

THE^{HON'BLE THE ACTINGCHIEF JUSTTCE SUJOY PAUL} AND .^{THE H.N'BLEsMT' JtstrcB RENUKAYARA}

¶27

of 2025 WRITPE^TITI ON^{No.9 851}

¶28

ORD ER:^{(Per the Hon'bletheActing ChiefJusticeSujog Paul)}

¶29

Sri Shaik^{Jeelani Basha' learned counselfor the petitioner} and Sri^{TChaitanyaKiran 'iearnedAssistant ' Government} Pleader^{representirigSriSwaroopOorilla' learnedSpecial} Government^{Pleaderfor State Tax'appearingfor the respondents'}

¶30

During^{the course of hearing' learned counsel for the parties} agreed^{that this writ petition may be disposedof by directing} respondent^{No' 1 to decide the representation of the petitioner} dated 06.O2.2O25'

¶31

Accordingly,^{the writ petition is disposed of by directingthe} petitioner to resubmit^{the representation dated06 'O2 '2025 along} with a copy^{of this order beforerespondent No' 1'In turn'} respondent^{No.1 shall consider and decide the representationby a} reasoned order^{within thirty days therefrom'The outcome shall} be communicated^{to the petitioner'It is needlessto mention that} this Court has^{not expressedany opinion on the meritsof the}

¶32

case. No order^{as to costs}

¶33

¶34

Miscel la n eous petidons pending, if any, shall starrd closed.

¶35

sD/-s. lvtALL.t KARJUN A RAO //TRUE COPYII ASSISTA NT REGISTRAR '\

¶36

¶37

)JECTON OFFICER

¶38

The De Commi puty,3ommissioner (sT) sTU_1 ssroner f CT) (Forme rly the Assista'tt

¶39

The Joint CoinThe Joint Coinnt CoinCoin LTU),ofSecunderabad Divtsion, Hydera b,adecunderabad Divtsion, Hydera b,adDivtsion, Hydera b,advtsion, Hydera b,adHydera b,ad b,ad Secunderabad Divtsion, Hydera b,adecunderabad Divtsion, Hydera b,adDivtsion, Hydera b,advtsion, Hydera b,adHydera b,ad b,ad

¶40

The Joint CoinThe Joint Coinnt CoinCoin mrssioner LTU),ofSecunderabad Divtsion, Hydera b,adecunderabad Divtsion, Hydera b,adDivtsion, Hydera b,advtsion, Hydera b,adHydera b,ad b,ad (cr)), SecunrJ State Tax erabad Dtvision Hyde rabad,^(Formerl y the Deputy Commissioner

¶41

Hyde rabad,

¶42

1. Ihe Chief Commiss roner of S ax,

¶43

Commercial Taxes), C.T.Comtate T (FormerlY the Commi

¶44

1. The plex, Na mpatly, Hyderabad ssroner of Hvd eraba d. Principal .Secretary, Revenue (CT) Department, Telangana Secretariat,

¶45

1. Two One CCsCC to SFit SHATK JEELANI BASHA Advocate tOpUCj Hyderabad. to [ouTlGP for STATE TAX, High Court for the State of Telrangana at

7 Two CD Copies;

KKS LS Ft-

HIGH COURT

DATED:17t04t2025

ORDER

WP.No.9851 of ZO2S

o R 1H€ S ,4
(
o (
!) 05 ilAv
o
,+ i (
* t)
r " '' t

¶55

DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶56

,ta
\o
K

M/s.Bajaj Electricals Limited, v. The Deputy Commissioner (St) STU-1

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Bajaj Electricals Limited, v. The Deputy Commissioner (St) STU-1

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Suraj Kiran Renewable Resources Private Limited Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Karra Ganapathi Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Karra Ganapathi Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Sangam Janardhan Goud, Vs M/s. Vasudeva Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

Garugu Raju Vs The State of Telangana

Nayeem Mohammed Vs State Tax Officer