This High Court judgment dismisses a writ petition filed by Smt. Utu Ramulamma challenging an order of the Special Collector, citing the petitioner's non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original J urisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THETHIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTTCEK. SARATH
WRIT PETITIONNO: 938 OF 2017
Between:
Smt.Utu Ramulamma, WoJangaiah,aged about36. years,- .O.q'AgricultureR/o Siii"OOVguda Viitige'eramPar6hayatltilucharla, Kandukoor Mandal R.R. Dist.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate Writ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus,dectaring the orders passedby the RespondentNo.2 in Case in Case No. D5/360112014dated 31-05-2016as bad, illegaland violative of Article 14 and21 of theConstitutionof lndia and set aside the same'
t.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP.NO: 1038 OF 20171
Petition under Section151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation ofthe impugnedorders passed by the Respondent No.2in Case No. D5t3607t2014 dated 31-05-2016,pending adjudication of the Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHAMMEDSHAKEEL
Counselfor the RespondentsNo.1 to3: GP FOR REVENUE THE ADVOCATE GENERAL
Counsel for the Respondent No.4:SRI M. SRIKANTH REDDY, S.C. FOR TGIIC
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
lIIRIT PEIITION No.938 of 2Ol7
ORDER:
This petition is coming for hearing since 2OL7. On 06.08.2025, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for Dismissal".
this Writ Petition shall also stand closed.
SD/.K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/ 6 SECTION OFFICER
To
MP
GJP
?r"2"
\
HIGH COURT
n ATED:03/0912025
1 iIE SIA
j<br>(:,
:-) 0 I JAN ?tzfi
ORDER
WP.No.93 ot 2017
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIO N FOR N .PROSECUTIO N WITHOUT COST S 6\n-P{
Smt. Utu Ramulamma
The State of Telangana
The Special Collector cum Revenue Divisional Officer
Mandal Revenue Officer
Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corp.
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
