Dismissed¶53

Sri Shiridi Sai Man Powers v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC7 Mar 2025WP/9369/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Infructuous dismissal; outsourcing manpower allotment without tender; Area Hospital Huzurnagar, Suryapet District, Telangana; District Employment Officer letter dated 11-11-2021 (A2IOS/AIIoUSRPT/2019); M/s. Sangeetha Man Power and Security Solutions nominated as third-party agency; Sri Shiridi Sai Man Powers petitioner; Article 226 Telangana High Court; WP 9369 of 2022; Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka; cause of action does not survive; no costs; IA 1/2022 s.151 CPC closed; decided 07-03-2025.

What did the court decide?

The Court recorded the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause of action in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. ¶33

Sri Shiridi Sai Man Powers Vs The State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰⁰ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 9369 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sri Shiridi Sai Man Powers, at Huzurnagar, Rep. by its President K.V.N. Singamohan Rao Sio K.L. Narsimha Rao Aged 54 years r/o H.No.15-96. Huzurnagar, Srinagar colony, Huzurnagar, Suryapet District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Medical and Health Department. Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

¶12

Telangana State Vaidya Vidhana Parishad, Rep. by its Commissioner, King Koti, Hyderabad.

¶13

J The District Collector, Suryapet District. 4 The Superintendent District Hospital(DCH), Suryapet, Suryapet District. 5 The District Employment Officer, Suryapet, Suryapet District. 6 Medical Superintendent Area Hospital, Huzurnagar. Suryapet District. 7 M/s. Sangeetha Man Power and Security solutions, H. No.2-7 -961812J2 Sainikpuri colony, Suryapet, rep. by its President.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or Direction preferably Wdt of Mandamus, declaring the letter vide Lr. no.A2IOS/AIIoUSRPT/2019 d1.11-11-2021 issued by the respondent no.5 to the respondent no. 4 allotting outsourcing agency i.e. respondent no.7 to supply the man power to area hospital, Huzurnagar, Suryapet District from 1'1-1'l2021 lo 31-3-2022 on nomination 3rd party basis ignoring the tender procedure, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural^justice and consequently set aside the said letterdt.ll-1 1-2021

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the letter vide Lr. no.A2lOS/AlloUSRpT/2019 dt.1 1-1 1- 2021 issued by the respondent no.5 to the respondent no. 4 allotting outsourcing agency i.e. respondent no.7 to supply the man power to area hospital, Huzurnagar, Suryapet District from 11-11-2021 to 31-3-2022, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M. V. HANUMANTHA RAO

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&6: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FAMILY WELFARE

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI WADDEPALLI RACHANA, SC

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: cP FOR REVENUE

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: M/s. S. VIJAy PRASHANTH

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR LABOUR

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent No.7:-

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

wp 9369_2022 NBK J

I \

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE NAGESH^BHEEMAPAKA

¶31

WRIT PETITION No.9369 of 2022

¶32

ORDER

¶33

It is represented by Mr. M.V. Hanumantha Rao,^{learned counselfor} the petitioner^{that the cause of action in this writ petition does not survive} f,or adjudication.

¶34

Recording the submission made, the writ^petition is^dismissedas

¶35

infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous^{petitions pending, if any, shallstand} closed.

¶36

SD/. S. MALLIKARJUNA^RAO ASSTSTANT^REGISTRAR

¶37

//TRUE COPY//

¶38

,,flr !l/ SECTION^{OFFICE R}

¶39

To,

¶40

One CC to^{SRl.M. V HANUMANTHARAO' Advocate TOPUC'I}

¶41

Two^{ccs to Gp FoR ilErir"ci'L ii=Ai1ij-FAt"tuvwEIFARE,Hishcourtfor} ,5;i:1"i:Pil1fl^EfJ;if;Asfl ^'3L'!,ryptccouNSELroPUCl ;. ffi d;^{i6 r',vtVrLnY pnnsnnxrn'Advocate.[oPUC]}

¶42