Writ petition seeking release of a withheld passport was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on two occasions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3255 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENIY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 9267 OF 2025
Between:
Azmeera Naresh, S/o. Rathna, Age About 30 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. PV Colony, Manuguru, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.
,..PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 oi the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or directlon more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in not considering the petitioner Passport application file No. HY1067139796724 Daled- 21 .11.2024 is illegal against the principles of the natural Justice consequently direct the respondents to release the Passport.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section'l 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to consider the petitioner Passport application file No. HY1067139796724 Daled- 21 .11 2024 and release the Passport.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. CH RASTRAPAL
Counsel for the Respondents: GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, Deputy Solicitor General of lndia
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
I
,l
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.9267 of 2o25
ORDER:
On 01.O4.2O25, when the matter was taken up for hearing, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and even today, when the matter is callecl. there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either ln physical mode or in virtual mode. Hence, there is no other option to this Court except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non-prosecution
1S dismissed for 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition
non-prosecution. There sha,ll be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall
stand closed.
To,
SD/-A. JAYASREE ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ,T,'n il"j SECTION OFFICER 1 One CC to SRI CH RASTRAPAL, Advocate IOPWI
CYS W- BS
i il
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1510412025
ORDER
-1':'----':.
,,.c SlAt t
,
J.) 2 B ttl [1 2[25 .bo
!)
t
L'EsPA1 c,
WP.No.9267 ot 2025
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
4
01 ,L(
<br>
Azmeera Naresh
The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs
The Regional Passport Officer, Hyderabad
N.V. Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
