Writ petition challenging reclassification of an electricity connection from industrial to high value commercial category was dismissed for non-prosecution after repeated absence of the petitioner and counsel on multiple listing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I t ! i il i I I , I J :
[3!001
I
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATfIYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAYOF AIJGUST TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY FI\E
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICENAC,ESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: E955 OF 2025
Between:
M/s USATA ENTERPRISESPRIVATELIMITED, RgO, qV its- Director' VADDAVALL|SACH|NHavingitsregisteredofficeatF-8'Ihirdl-bor.Gall flo. S, Vi;ay Bkrck, LaxmiNagai, East Delhi, lndia ' 11OO92'
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
! i i i
I I I !i t i i iI E
! 1 tt
,/' Petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of lnc ia prayingthat in the .,/circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased " to lssUE a appropriatewrit,order or Direction more partictrlarlyone in the nature of writ of Mandamusdeclaringthe action of Respondr:ntsmore particularly Respondent No.6 inissuing theLetterdated 28-O 1.2025vide LrNo' ADE/OP/Cherlapally/Notice/D.l,lo.1oo5t24 instead of changirrg the categoryof High Value commercial Servicecategory 2 to lndustrial Servicecategory 3A with immediate effect as the sameis changed by the Respondent Nos.8to '10 without intimating to thePetitionerdespite there being a lnjur ction Decreeag-ainst Respondlnt Nos.8to i 0 dated13.03.2025 in ARB.O.P.No .54 ot 2024 on the file of XXIV Additional chiefJudge, city civil court at Hyderabird as the Petitioneris cunently sustaininghuge loss due to the said changeof slab withoutintimationby the Respondent Nos.8to 10 only to harass the Petitioneris,\rbitrary,lllegal, unjust and violative ofprinciples ofNaturalJustice and consr;quentlyto directthe Respondent Nos.2to 7 to restorethe Electricity Connectionwith lndustrial Service Category 34 bysetting aside the impugned lefter d rted 28.02.2025with Lr.No.ADE/ OP/ Cherlapally/Notice/ D.No.1005/24,and cartcellingthe conversion made in Petitioner'sPremisesNo. Plot No.Z, 2-4-972, 9 '3' B.N. Reddy Nagar cherlapally, Kapra Mandal,Hyderabad- 500051 with immeciate effectas the same is changed by theRespondent Nos.8 to 10 withoutintin ating to the Petitioner despite there being alnjunction Decree dated 13.03-2021in ARB.O.P.No.54 of 2O24 on the file ofXXIV Additional Chief Judge, City CivilCc urt at Hyderabad
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition unrler section1 51 CPCpraying that in the t ircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filedin support of the writ petition,the High courtmay be pleasedto direct the RespondentNos.2to 7 to restorethe Eleclricityconnectionwith lndustrial Service Category 34 bysettingaside the irpugnedletterdated 28.02.2025 with Lr. No.ADE/OP/ Cherlapally/Notic:/ D.No.1005/24,and cancelling the conversionmadein Petitioner's Premisesllo. Plot No.z, 2-4-972, 973, B.N. Reddy Nagar Cherlapally,Kapra Mandal,Hyrlerabad-500051with immediate effect as the sameis changed by the Respondent Nos.8to 10 without intimating to the Petitionerdespitethere being alnj lnction Decreedated '13.03.2025 in ARB.O.P.No .54 of 2024 on the file of XXIV\dditional Chief Judge' City Civil Court at Hyderabad
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.GOVARDHANREDOYJOUNDLA (Not Present)
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1:GP FORENERGY
Counsel for the RespondentNos.2 to 7: SRIN.SREEDHAT REDDY SC FOR TGSPDCL
Counsel for the RespondentNos.8to 10: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITIOIT No.8955 OF 2025
ORDER:
There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. L. VIJAYALAXMI SISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To,
\
l One CC to SRl.GOVARDHANREDDYJOUN Advocate [OPUCI
KKS GJP 8)
\
t
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 10812025
(!
'i
ii 7 ttl ;16
', .r,
ORDER
WP.No.8955 of 2025
DISM]SSING THE WRITPETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
,
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s USATA Enterprises Private Limited, rep. by its Director Vaddavalli Sachin
The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary Power and Energy Department
Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd of Telangana
The Superintendent Engineer, Operation, Medchal Circle, TGSPDCL
The Divisional Engineer, Sainikpuri/ICSC, 33/11KV Moulali Sub-Station
The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation Section, Cherlapally, TGSPDCL
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
